Over at Damian's, Dr. Dawg and M@ bring the clever snark, whereupon commenter "Blame Crash" unleashes your typical whinger wit:
Why don't you two get a room!
I'm sure that one's going to leave a mark. Check back later when some other whinger weighs in with, "OMFG LOL ROTFLMAO HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!"
13 comments:
My snappy comeback should have been "You get a room!" Alas, it came to me too late.
Personally, I think any wicked retort should have involved calling someone a "douchebag." But that's just me.
It's like they all share the same brain cell.
Hm,
I suppose the comment about Sandy getting a room with the Harper accomplishments was much, much more witty, eh...
Who is 'Raphael Alexander' and what has he done with 'Adrian'?
what would you know about wit, "ralphie"?
KEvron
Hey, Adrialplexander, any time you want to address the actual points I and Dawg were making, you go ahead and do that.
Breath-holding, we are not.
I'm going to try and explain the difference to goosestep boy, someone catch me if I pass out from the effort.
Dawg and M@ do not express an irrational affinity for each other. They don't lie about each others accomplishments, nor do they seem to march in lock step on every issue.
And yet Sandy believe that Harper walks on water, exagerates/lies about his accomplishments and generally behaves like a person with a mad, teenage crush on a pop star.
Can you see the difference?
Anyway, I have no idea how you have time to be here, aren't you meant to be off somewhere parsing out citizenship and working out who is deserving of rights?
Dear Adrian/Raphael -- here's the difference. After many months and countless posts on my part criticizing Sandy's list, exposing its hypocrisy and enumerating its bogus, contrived and meaningless entries, I have earned the right to finally lose patience and be a bit snippy about its worthlessness. See how that works?
I thought not.
Whatever you say CC/Robert/Bobby/John/Peter/Day...
See how that's annoying?
I thought not.
I'm not sure what you're bitching and whining about here, Adrian. You voluntarily outed yourself, but now you're pissed when someone refers to you by your real name? Make up your mind -- either you want to blog under your real name, or under your pseudonym. When you splash your identity all over the Intertoobz of your own free will, you really don't have the moral high ground to be such a useless fucking whiner when people use that information.
And you really don't have the high ground given that you were such a gleeful participant in my outing. Or had you forgotten that?
What a hypocrite.
CC/Robert/Bobby/John/Peter/Day
Do you remember CC claiming that "Canadian Cynic" was his real name, much less publishing under that name?
See how that's different?
I thought not.
Do you remember CC claiming that "Canadian Cynic" was his real name, much less publishing under that name?
Don't you go all logical on Adrian/Raphael, he will not understand....
Post a Comment