Chronicles of Twatrick: So what's Patrick up to these days?

For reasons I will not get into yet, I'm curious as to precisely where Patrick is hanging out these days. Is he crashing in the basement at Casa Ross now that sister Penny appears to have moved in? And, more importantly, it would be useful to know where he's working at the moment.

Any info along those lines (possibly accompanied by legally-taken pics) appreciated.

P.S. I had, for a while, wondered why that hovel had not gone on the market, since I naturally assumed the will stipulated that it would be sold and proceeds split among the squalling siblings. But from what I hear, one of the needier siblings has moved in, and that makes sense, but it also means that Patrick still has no actual residence (apart from perhaps living in the basement). So what is Patrick's official "residence" from a legal perspective? That is, what is his proper address for legal service? And if it's not Casa Ross, is Patrick technically homeless?

So many questions. 

Chronicles of Twatrick: Inspector Clouseau, not Sherlock Holmes.

I am reminded of this spewage from Patrick "Three chins and growing" Ross who, back in 2023, freaked out over someone allegedly taking pictures around Casa Ross, then bragging that he had "a lead" and was likely to make an apprehension sometime soon.

 

This, of course, never happened. And I'm guessing Patrick is still waiting for that apology.

Chronicles of Twatrick: Happy interestversary!

Yes, only two days after the 45th birthday of undischarged bankrupt and financial fugitive perpetually looking over his shoulder Patrick Ross, it is now a full 58 months since a judge paddled Patrick's voluminous backside, told him how much he owed me and cranked up the interest rate on that debt to a delicious five per cent:

 

 

And given Patrick's refusal to co-operate or make any payments on his rapidly-increasing debt to me, we're now looking at over $125,000. And now on to a couple bits of somewhat new business.

In an earlier comment, some anonymous regular opined on the stupidity of Patrick, who could have simply accepted his 2014 bankruptcy Conditional Discharge Order (CDO) of $200 per month for 14 years, because that's a pretty meagre monthly payment and he would have been almost done by now. Uh, it's worse than that.

You see, while that was indeed the terms of the CDO, the CDO also stated that as long as Patrick made those payments religiously for the first three years, he had the option of paying off the entire outstanding balance after that. That's right -- while paying a paltry $200 per month for three years, Patrick could have been stashing away enough to be able to wipe out the remaining approximately $27,000 in one shot, meaning Patrick could have been out of bankruptcy free and clear almost a decade ago. As we all know, however, Patrick's arrogance simply would not allow him to pay me anything, since he would see that as a sign of defeat, which is why he's in the legal and financial bottomless well he is. But it's worse than that.

While I was originally the primary creditor in Patrick's bankruptcy -- and thus would have received most of that $34,000 -- given Patrick's refusal to follow the rules, I filed successfully to have his protection of bankruptcy lifted with respect to me, which means that my original judgment against Patrick of $85,000 was now back in force (as a regular debt not related to bankruptcy). However, while Patrick now owes me over $125,000, he is still bankrupt and is still required to fulfill the terms of his CDO to get out of bankruptcy, which means (and I have confirmed this with his former trustee) that Patrick will still have to pay the outstanding balance related to his CDO (about $25,000) to get out of bankruptcy, but whether or not he does that would not affect in any way the money he owes me. (I was also told that if Patrick does that, most of that money would likely go to me, anyway.) But let's get to the last issue for today.

As y'all know, Patrick's gaggle of hillbilly siblings had an estate sale last weekend, where they tried desperately to unload such cultural treasures as his late mom's complete set of "Joanie Loves Chachi" collector plates and his dad's velvet Elvis paintings and Dale Earnhardt replica NASCAR trophies. This suggests that, maybe, just maybe, those yokels are preparing to put Casa Ross on the market, which is why I'm going to ask my network of spies and confidential informants to be particularly vigilant and watch Casa Ross for, say, a "For Sale" sign going up, whereupon I will leap into action and ... well, I'll keep that to myself for now. But I'd appreciate my elves being especially observant regarding any sudden changes around Casa Ross and letting me know immediately.

Apart from all of this, I think we're done here. For now.

BONUS TRACK: Since Patrick is currently gloating about how he "defeated" me in court on one occasion due to his self-educated boy lawyer brilliance, it's worth reproducing the final part of a judge's decision related to Patrick when he filed, objecting to my application to register my 2010 Ontario judgment in Saskatchewan for the purpose of initiating collection proceedings against him.

Patrick chose to write and file that objection all on his own, and his childish, grievance-laden response was so utterly nonsensical and detached from reality that ... well, I will let J. McMurtry have the last word:

 

It's one thing to have the court rule against you; it's quite another to get spanked that savagely for submitting juvenile bullshit.

MORE BONUS: At some point, when I grow weary of it, I will file to have Patrick's meritless 2022 defamation lawsuit against me dismissed as abandoned, and the beauty of that is that I will be able to use an earlier ruling against Patrick as my legal precedent. Recall that back here, I reproduced the relevant part of a ruling wherein a judge found that the three-and-a-half year delay associated with Patrick's appeal of his 2014 Conditional Discharge Order was both inordinate and inexcusable, which is all that is required to have the court toss a legal action. Let's explain that in a bit more detail.

To find that a delay was "inordinate" simply means that it was stupidly and inappropriately long; in Patrick's case, the judge found that three and a half years was silly given that his appeal was effectively ready to go back in 2014. In addition, the delay must be "inexcusable"; that is, even if the delay was inordinate, perhaps you have an excuse like you were locked in an ICE detention centre all that time. Again, the judge found that Patrick had no plausible excuse for dragging his ass for that long.

And given that Patrick's current lawsuit against me was filed in August of 2022, we are now approaching four years of delay, which means I can take the above ruling, put it in front of a judge, and say nothing more than, "The court already found inordinate and inexcusable delay in that case; this case is equivalent and even more egregious." That really should be the extent of it, and it's unlikely that Patrick is going to attempt to move this case along at any time since he knows full well that, if this gets to court, there will likely be other parties waiting for him.

In short, when I file to dismiss this idiocy of Patrick's, I will need to say little more than, "I already have solid legal precedent for this." And that lawsuit will be dismissed as abandoned. And I will be awarded costs.

Sometimes, Patrick is not the sharpest sandwich in the picnic basket. 

Chronicles of Twatrick: Legal victory, you say? I think not.

One of my reliable sources informs me that, yet again, undischarged bankrupt and man whistling past the graveyard Patrick "Super Nexus Chick Magnet Quintuple Threat" Ross is bragging about how he "defeated" me in a court hearing a few years back. I've explained what happened in that hearing at least a couple of times but, what the heck, here's the definitive overview so you know what actually took place.

Not long after Patrick filed his monumentally meritless and frivolous defamation lawsuit against me in mid-2022 (a filing for which he now refuses to proceed), I decided to try to file -- on my own -- a motion to have that action dismissed for a number of reasons. I've already pointed out how absurd it was (Patrick whining about stuff that happened as far back as 2008), but the salient feature was that, in a bout of over-confidence, I decided that I was smart enough to file that motion myself.

So I did.

Predictably, because I had little experience in representing myself in legal matters, I filed a notably deficient motion -- I simply did not reference everything I needed to reference. And at the hearing, the judge diplomatically pointed this out and explained that he could not rule on a motion that was not properly drawn up, and that was the end of that (although, curiously, the judge even said that it looked like I had a pretty strong case but, still, he could not proceed). End of hearing. So let's make sure you understand what happened there.

I did not "lose" that hearing, and Patrick did not "win" that hearing, for the simple reason that there was no hearing. The judge did not hear arguments from either Patrick or myself, and did not rule on the merits of the arguments -- he simply said that there was not enough in my filing to proceed, and ended those proceedings. No one won, and no one lost, and I have the right to refile that motion any time I want. So, no, Patrick, did not "win" that hearing. But if Patrick wants to compare legal victories, let's start a list:

• I sued Patrick for malicious defamation and won a judgment of $85,000.
• I forced Patrick into court on numerous occasions during which he was found in contempt of court twice.
• I drove Patrick into personal bankruptcy.
• At Patrick's bankruptcy discharge hearing, I successfully argued that he was not entitled to an absolute discharge.
• After Patrick filed a defective appeal of his bankruptcy Conditional Discharge Order, I successfully filed to have that appeal dismissed as abandoned.
• I successfully filed to have Patrick's protection under bankruptcy lifted with respect to me so that his original judgment amount was reinstated (with interest).
• I successfully registered my judgment in Saskatchewan so that I could initiate collection proceedings against Patrick.

So if Patrick wants to keep bragging about a "victory" for which there was no actual hearing, good for him. I'll compare that with my basketful of victories any time. 

P.S. Just to be clear, because my motion was never actually "heard" and ruled upon, I have every right to re-file it whenever I want. Which is why I'm making a record of every time Patrick yaps on about me -- so that when I do that re-filing and Patrick whines that he's been too busy to proceed with his idiotic action, I have a binderful of him having enough time to talk smack about me.

Chronicles of Twatrick: Happy "4-5".

For what it's worth, today is Patrick's 45th birthday, so you're invited to drop him a note if you can figure out where he is when he's not frantically avoiding process servers and debt collectors and paying me the $125K+ that he owes me.

Chronicles of Twatrick: Of all the things that never happened ...

... this never happened the most:

P.S. It goes without saying that this scenario is hard to believe since, if you were trying to remain inconspicuous, the last thing you would do is wear a mask in the middle of June on a residential street and be openly taking photos of peoples' cars.

I'm going to guess that no actual evidence of this will be forthcoming.

P.P.S. Apparently, over on X, Patrick is insisting that all of the above actually happened but, sadly, no one had a chance to take a picture as evidence. Really? In a society where pretty much every single person owns a smartphone with a camera, not a single person had the presence of mind to snap a photo as the culprit was running away? Gosh, what bad luck. 

Chronicles of Twatrick: How's that estate sale going?

Anyone here swing by Casa Ross and check out the collection of hillbilly hardware for sale?