It was early yesterday morning that I posted this missive about how political parties should deal with the talentless hacks from Canada's lunatic media showing up at their events unannounced and uninvited, and rule number one was -- simply say no. Go on, read what I wrote ... that's what I wrote. So it's delicious to see the Liberal Party doing exactly as I advised, as you can see from the first 30 seconds of this video, where Rebel News' useless mouthpiece and David Menzies-wannabe Tamara Ugolini is told, "You're not invited."
And tell me I didn't call it precisely when I claimed that the Rebel News hack would try to engage the gatekeeper in demanding an explanation or arguing about rationale or what have you, and that said gatekeeper should stick to his guns and just keep saying no, which is precisely what Ben Smith did, to his credit.
In fairness, I watched only the first half-minute or so to revel in my advice being implemented so deliciously, so if things changed later on, well, whatever. But from the snippet I saw, it would appear that my strategy is the perfect way to deal with these dingbats.
You're welcome.
P.S. OK, I sucked it up and watched a little more of that video, and it's just creepy how closely it plays out compared to my earlier piece. Good God, Ugolini admits to showing up without getting a confirmation of accreditation (which I expressly warned about), and even describes Ben Smith as a "gatekeeper" (the very adjective I used). And I explicitly cautioned said gatekeeper about engaging said hack about reasons for rejection and, for the most part, Smith pulled it off.
Man, I'm good at this.
P.P.S. OK, I sacrificed minutes of my life to watch almost all of that video and, other than that it was the depressingly-untalented Tamara Ugolini rather than David Menzies, tell me that this paragraph I wrote early yesterday morning doesn't describe perfectly how all that played out:
I am available as a political consultant for reasonable rates. Oh, and check back later when I explain the concept of trespassing.
FURTHER MUSINGS ... I just realized another protective strategy that absolutely should be used to deal with nonsense like this. During Ugolini's plaintive whining, she admits that, while she sent e-mail asking about details for the event, she received no reply, so she decided to go. This was a (minor?) mistake on the organizer's part.
Yes, we all agree, when one receives an application for event accreditation from any of the worthless yobs at Der Rebel, it's tempting to just point it at the Trash bucket and move on with life.
Don't do that.
By ignoring the application, you are simply opening the door for said fake journo to show up and bitch and whine about never getting a reply. Rather, the proper response is to reply, but keep it short and courteous:
Dear <Whatever>: Thank you for your application for media accreditation for this event. Unfortunately, your application has not been approved.
Thank you.
That's it; brevity is the key, and under no circumstances get personal, such as, "And by the way, your media outlet blows dead bears." Simply reject the application politely, and make sure the gatekeeper is aware that this was done, so that when Menzies or Ugolini -- or some other worthless hack -- shows up, you say quite sweetly, "Yes, we know you applied, and I know your application was refused, so what are you doing here?"
Doing this just ups the humiliation factor even higher, and that's what we're all about here.
You're welcome.
OFFS ... just when you thought Ugolini couldn't be even more of a reprehensible prevaricator, here she is, blaming it all on sexism:
She really is a piece of work. And by work, I mean "crap."