Thursday, August 07, 2008
Document the whiny, pearl-clutching, pants-pissing dumbfuckitude.
Well, sprinkle me with brown sugar and call me breakfast ... who could possibly have imagined this:
And thanks for playing, Jack. The next time I need a family-size pack of pathetic whiners and liars, I have your number.
P.S. By the way, Jack ... those Sandy-sized urine stains on the hallway carpet? I recommend Febreze.
AFTERSNERK: Yes, Red Tory's comment just after Jack's does sum things up nicely, but RT missed perhaps the most important point, which is:
You cannot have a civil discussion with those people.
Quite simply, even if you show up with polite, genteel, nuanced and thoughtful commentary, you will be mocked contemptuously. You will be denigrated for what you've written previously, who you read on a regular basis, what site you arrived from and a number of other utter irrelevancies.
Then it's on to stage two, where your commentary will be twisted, distorted and misrepresented and normal English words will be weirdly redefined, while the goalposts are moved furiously around you. Eventually, suffocating under a deluge of arguing in bad faith and ridiculous dishonesty, you will quite justifiably snap and head for the door, throwing off a parting shot such as, "Jesus, you people are ignorant retards!" At which point you have now become just another data point in the mounting evidence as to how none of those leftard moonbats can possibly participate in polite society, and isn't that just a shame, tut tut.
And so it goes ...
P.S. And if all of the above doesn't sound hideously familiar, you haven't been paying attention.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
I think Red summed it up nicely.
Anyway, Sandy Crux is unteachable. And for a PhD in education, the irony in that is so delicious is has to be fattening.
This is how the Right views education. And we only have to gaze south to see where that leads.
neo is especially great at this--you comment using reasonably thought-out points, and he rebutts with inanities and name calling, and when you call him on that, he gets even more out-to-lunch, and it just proceeds downhill from there, until you get to a point when you just tell him to F-off and then he's all 'See!!! Screaming leftards can't discuss anything!!'
Ok the right wing has degenerated into a self-pity orgy, let's back away and leave them to their wailing and gnashing of teeth.
We can mock them for it after it's over.
I appreciate your sympathy for them, Pal, but it really is maddeningly infuriating to listen to the whining of people who are so stunningly, hopelessly and utterly unprepared for any sort of intellectual discourse.
"Yeah, well, I'm taking my ball and going home." That's the best you can expect. And that's being optimistic.
but it really is maddeningly infuriating to listen to the whining of people who are so stunningly, hopelessly and utterly unprepared for any sort of intellectual discourse.
Even more so with people like Sandy Crux, since she's made such an issue of her pedagogical credentials, all the while pandering and avoiding mentoring cretins like MaryTard, Albertard Girl, TrueTard Like You Joanne, GabbyTard from QC and all the other 'tards too numerous to mention.
You've got atrophied brains on your hands, Ms. Crux.
Perhaps I didn’t articulate that point clearly enough, but it was my intent to describe how their heinously dishonest tactics effectively serve to undermine “civil discourse” (notwithstanding all the disingenuous “pearl-clutching” about offensive “potty mouth” language and such).
Aside from cutting the mic from the most rampantly hateful and malicious trolls (in the true sense of the word), on my blog, people are free to say whatever they want, however they want. To me, this is the most essential form of “civility”... Sadly, it’s a value that Crocky and her “anonymous” cohorts are wilfully oblivious to, preferring as they do to hunker down inside their heavily fortified bubbles of self-reflective narcissism.
neo is now in full comment deletion mode!
This is the offending comment he has deleted twice so far:
======================== snip
sorry, nonny... it's obvious your actual agenda here is simply to be annoying and obstructive... and i just haven't got time for the pain.
No, it quite obvious your agenda is to be annoying and obstructive. You have time for that, where's the problem?
so, please... declare victory, yet again... and find somewhere else for your mindless trolls.
You're just miffed that I parry every one of your asinine misquotes and sneers at me. You don't like it when someone plays your game right back at you, do you?
I'm supposed to swear at you or something so you can call me more names, right? That's your usual pattern.
Too bad it isn't working on me. Notice anything else that doesn't work with me?
you've had more than enough warning... and yet you persisted.
I respond to your posts and comments. Is this not what a blog is for? You continuously make over the top baiting statements, and when someone doesn't go nuts over it, you pout.
you're boring and annoying
Yes, I am not providing you with the kind of entertainment you want. You moan about wanting serious debate, but when it is provided you go back to your schoolyard tactics.
and i'm tired of it.
Too bad.
========================== snip
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Oh yes, and he's repeatedly deleting this one too, apparently he needs to protect the fragile kai-wolf's sensibilities:
=============== snip
My opinion is that I don't know why the stats are proportionaly higher, I just know that by looking at them, they obviously are.
Thank you for actually answering. What was so hard about that? Having an actual debate is hindered if you are worried about "traps" and "bait".
I tend to assume people are not racist, since racism has always seemed to be arbitrary and stupid. But I know people who look beyond a person's actions and make predictions based on their race.
When a claim of racism is made, it should not be dismissed out of hand. If crime statistics show similar proportions from all groups, then one can reasonably presume there is no racism going on. If the crime stats show disproportions, it is an indicator that it should be looked into further. But it cannot be used to prove racism.
Often there are other factors you can measure that will also correlate to crime rates. For example, you will likely see more street crime among people living in poverty or with less education. It is possible racism contributes to those situations, and so indirectly contributes to the crime stats. Personally, I think a big part is a sense of hopelessness that contributes to crime. Hopelessness leads to not caring about anything.
This of course is the "root causes" that are so regularly sneered at. Like it or not, root causes do go a long way to explaining crime. You don't have to avoid punishing crime because of it, but you would be wise to address the root causes to reduce it in the first place.
Unless of course you are in the private prison business.
============= snip
Mission Accomplished!!!
Hahahahahahaha!
Maybe it's just me, but I can't bear to read the postings of this creature called "Neo" because they all just seem to come across as a lot of incoherent, illiterate nonsense punctuated by noisy bursts of static.
He tries very hard to be infuriating. It's deliberate, I'm sure. But when you dish it right back at him, he sulks and goes into standard BT "I can't hear you" full delete mode.
So he's pwned.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Whatever. I find him utterly boring.
"Red Tory: 'he does make entirely valid points....'
"Actually, he does not Red. The problem as Sandy and I see it is that the media and people like 'CC' turn to foul language when they can’t argue properly."
is it just me, or is jack another intellectually dishonest fuckhead?
KEvron
....yeah, the media turn to foul language when they can't argue properly. talking point spewing retard.
KEvron
Who is Jack and why should I divert my attention from far more important things to care?
Precisely, Sheena. I agree with you, as athletes say, 110%.
So, on I go to other things.
"So, on I go to other things."
does she ever do anything other than pooh-pooh?!
KEvron
and now jack's moderating me into oblivion, despite my having refrained from invective or insult. fucking frauds, every one of them.
KEvron
Take screen caps, KEv and send them to me -- I'll gladly post them.
no need for caps; i haven't been deleted, just moderated into the ether. funny what jack deems appropriate, though.
fucking frauds, every last one of them. and they know i know.
KEvron
Jack doesn't delete comments unless they breach his rules which can be found on the site.
Having said that it is Jack's belief that the net gives him a chance to "reach out and touch someone".
Don't go near Sandy or your computer may not work so well in future.
Post a Comment