... and then there's sanctimonious fetus fetishist SUZANNE:
Personally, I find eugenics repugnant. But the elimination of “undesirables” is done everyday in this country– through abortion. 85-90% of Down Syndrome’s fetuses are aborted. People refuse to parent children who are genetically undesirable.
Quite so, SUZANNE ... because only conservatives have the self-sacrificing nobility to nobly self-sacrifice for the damaged children. Oh, wait ... no, they don't:
Consider, too, that the children currently available for adoption in Canada are disproportionately burdened with problems of one kind or another. Many suffer from physical problems such as fetal alcohol syndrome. Many are toddlers, or even older children, not infants, who have been seized from abusive homes by Children’s Aid Societies and made wards of the state by the courts. Would-be parents may be unwilling to take on the extra challenges that such children pose, but would happily take on the care of an uninjured, pre-born baby without undesirable psychological baggage.
If that intelligence-based eugenics program ever came to pass, SUZANNE should be the first one in line never allowed to have children again. But I'm guessing you didn't need me to explain that.
HOLY FUCK, the overwhelming irony.
2 comments:
If one is to base conclusions on the Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta, it's quite evident that eugenics do not produce the desired effect.....
"Young women choose to abort because they do not want the responsibility of giving birth and the legacy of having had a child in adolescence or young adulthood."
I dunno where she gets her ideas. Maybe she just makes them up and hopes nobody will notice the fiction. Young women today don't think in terms of "legacy." And giving birth is not a responsibility -- it's an inconvenience that can be thwarted.
Women of all ages choose to abort because they do not want to be pregnant. There is no less and no more to the issue than that. But the stupid bbw cow continues to try and heap on the propaganda to make it seem as if women who choose abortion are committing some kind of genocide.
Karen Selick's idea of fetal transplatation is pretty similar to an idea I've been advocating for years -- find a way to end a pregnancy without causing the fetus to be irredeemably destroyed (I often suggest transplating the fetus into the nearest no-choice male), and we could put an end to the fight between choice and no-choice. But every time I bring it up, the no-choice side always yells it down.
The no-choicers don't want a workable solution. They want domination.
They are truly twisted.
Post a Comment