Wednesday, April 23, 2008

And while we're on the topic, Chuck ...


From today's Calgary Herald:

We don't want to subsidize porn

Charles McVety, For the Calgary Herald
Published: Sunday, April 20, 2008


Really, Chuck? Well, I don't want to subsidize religion:



So, Chuck, howzabout you yank the fucking log out of your own eye before bitching about the speck in mine?

12 comments:

Mike said...

Screw him, tax the churches.

Or at least get CRA to look at McVety's highly questionable tax situations.

Dr.Dawg said...

Nailed the bastard in one. Good for you.

Chimera said...

"Screw him, tax the churches."

W00t!

And ain't it interesting that he feels it's his right to complain about something that does not affect his organization? His church doesn't pay taxes. Why should he care?

hooligan said...

Maybe the government should just make your porn donations tax-deductible?

KEvron said...

"....including a few that I would describe as pornographic."

ah. that's what he means. i didn't think the porn "industry" needed subsidy. i should have known he was lying; he peddles god, afterall....

KEvron

Patrick Ross said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CC said...

Bye, Twatrick. Feel free to stop by again when you can stop lying.

Patrick Ross said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CC said...

You're still not amusing me, Patrick. Try again.

Patrick Ross said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CC said...

Nope, still not funny.

Patrick Ross said...

So, still hardcore on the "deleting uncomfortable hypocrisy" thing, huh?

I'm just going to keep coming with it, you piece of human trash:

Comparing a request for donations to dispersal of taxpayer funds is a false equivalence. Noting that you, like your political opponents, wish harm on others, is not.