Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2146)
-
▼
June
(128)
- Why, yes, I WAS right again, thanks for asking.
- And, occasionally, the good guys win one.
- The mote in one's eye.
- ... and that's why they call him "the eJankulator."
- The Politically Correct Right
- HAHAHAHA!
- You have to love the irony.
- I'm in love.
- Apparently, Google can still be intimidating.
- ... but some people are more equal than others, kn...
- It depends on what you mean by "unity," I guess.
- Big Media ate my brain.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- Grovelling in the Great White North.
- I'm ... speechless.
- Low-hanging fruit, Dr. Roy edition.
- Dodging another gay bullet.
- The selectivity of outrage, Joel Johannesen style.
- Let's call it the "Steve Janke apology."
- Apparently, that whole "capitalism" thingy has its...
- Are we out of Cheeto's AGAIN??
- Pacheco and other illnesses.
- I'm sure Adam's world is a very happy place.
- Why, yes, I CAN politicize anything ... why do you...
- So how's that "surge" going? Part deux.
- Sometimes, it's for their own good.
- So how's that "surge" going again?
- Support the tro... oh, fuck 'em.
- Thursday morning Chester rock open thread.
- The CPoC and NASCAR: A match made at MAACO.
- That Steve Janke is one popular guy.
- You can't make this stuff up.
- Bring the snark, bring the pain.
- The Steve Janke preferential treatment syndrome.
- I'd like to thank the fucking academy ...
- Good boy, Jonathan. Here's a biscuit.
- If you can't count on your Blogging Tory friends ...
- Drinking pragmatically in Waterloo.
- Dear U.S. troops: Make yourselves comfortable ove...
- Life just doesn't get any better ...
- This must represent karmic balance in the universe...
- There's a new troublemaker in town.
- Winning hearts and minds.
- "... and if she buys kippers, it will not rain."
- Monday morning Chester rock.
- How much wingnuttery can you handle?
- Mission acc ... uh, whatever.
- What do Blogging Tories and crickets have in common?
- Saturday night arena rock.
- One of these things is slightly different from the...
- About that "credibility" thing ...
- Dear Olaf: That's quite the crowd you're hanging ...
- Your occasional Joelitude.
- Pot. Kettle. Black.
- Yeah, I've heard that patience is a virtue.
- IOKIYAR -- Part 8,992.
- That is one flexible front line, Tony.
- The bigotry of really low expectations.
- Hermetically-sealed wingnuttia, Joanne-style.
- The wingnuts are coming! The wingnuts are coming!
- Oh, no ... Conservative hypocrisy!
- Oh, puhleeze ...
- And the James Holsinger beatdown just keeps rollin...
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- It's Wednesday, so Joanne must be terribly, terrib...
- Joanne, you ignorant slut.
- This one's gonna be hard to explain away.
- Sometimes, there really might be two sides to ever...
- Simple answers to simple questions.
- Hermetically-sealed wingnuttery, Joanne-style.
- Dear Colin: Piss off.
- Busy Shaved Ape
- Dumb as dirt: The Joanne's Journey story.
- Dear Joanne: Read much?
- Judge to wingnuts: Bite me.
- Yes, Virginia, there is a God ...
- Steve walks warily down the street with the brim p...
- A Kate-sized towel snap to the privates.
- About NAFTA and water ...
- You keep using that word "democracy" ...
- What kind of fuckery is this?
- When casting needs an offensive, homophobic wingnu...
- WTF?
- Apparently, God DOES have a sense of humour.
- I'm "right," for various re-definitions of the wor...
- It's that undercover black man again ...
- Conservatives are just fucking retarded: Part 6,4...
- On the other hand ...
- Holy. Freaking. God.
- Stevie Harper, Statesmanish
- Apparently, they all DO look alike to Kate.
- Awwwwwwwkward ...
- And you started off so well, Mr. Erl.
- My God, I love being right: Part 3,819.
- Pardon me, Scooter?
- We have ALWAYS been at war with Eurasia.
- I have a good memory. It's just short.
- Surge accomplished! Or maybe not.
- "Bob Barker ... come on down!"
- One-upmanship, Pharyngula style.
-
▼
June
(128)
12 comments:
Pacheco had the nads to apologize for a tasteless comment. What about you, shithead? Let's recall: "And regarding the name-calling, well, here's a thought, Joanne: If you don't want to be described as an ignorant, hateful, dishonest, homophobic cunt, try not acting like one. It's just a thought, you know." And not a fucking word of apology for that shit.
But somehow, in that flyshit sized brain of yours, a fuck-up who at least had the bag to own up to his crap is worthy of scorn because his apology doesn't measure up to your fucking standards? What a complete and total fuck wad you are!
CC and PSA,
From the preponderence of dumbass trolls that seem to be coming by lately to foul the comment threads, your site has clearly made some sort of breakthrough and become a sufficiently large thorn in the side of dumbass conservatives. Well done.
Congrats!
Fuck that. Joanne and her "Journey" needed that. Go fuck yourself Anon - Pacheco is a moronic bigot and so is Joanne. Someone has to smack back into shape.
No apologies for that!
"And not a fucking word of apology for that shit."
Ever notice how your shit is stuff, and everyone else's stuff is shit?
That's George Carlin, btw. You, sir, are about as fresh as a George Carlin punchline.
Oh, and fuck shit ass. Feel better? I know I do.
I'm following the initial commentator's post:
CC comes down hard on right-wing asshole for some lame defence of fascism, and he uses profanity.
And he doesn't apologize.
Somebody else tastelessly uses news about another person's battle with breast cancer to speculate and pontificate about her personal life.
And apologizes.
And the initial commentator is a fucking moron.
I hope anonymous no.1 apologises for that rather intemperate and foul-mouthed rant.
...It was most upsetting.
thwap, if you would take your head out of your ass, you would see that the motivations of the individuals in question ( CC, Pacheco ) is immaterial to my point. Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it. The other one, the gutless one, has the nerve to cast ridicule at the first for his less-than-stellar apology, when he himself cannot work up the nads to do likewise for his behaviour.
Is this too subtle for you?
Or, thwap, do you believe that calling a woman a "cunt" is acceptable if you really, really disagree with her opinion?
Too subtle for me?
Nah, too incoherent and stupid. I've already explained it for you, ... figure it out.
Re: The "C" word. I think it's a bit strong. But "CC" used it to make a point about right-wing pseudo-feminists who called "Status of Women Canada" - "SOWs".
I don't agree, but it's not as if he's a holocaust denier like you guys tend to be. Or savage,homophobic closet cases, ... or economic dipshits, ... warmongers, racists, and losers.
Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it.
Now that's moral relativism at its finest.
Anonymous 11:37PM, at the risk of coming across as pedantic, I believe "fuckwad" is one word.
"Or, thwap, do you believe that calling a woman a "cunt" is acceptable if you really, really disagree with her opinion?"
Only if she is one...
Post a Comment