Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2146)
-
▼
June
(128)
- Why, yes, I WAS right again, thanks for asking.
- And, occasionally, the good guys win one.
- The mote in one's eye.
- ... and that's why they call him "the eJankulator."
- The Politically Correct Right
- HAHAHAHA!
- You have to love the irony.
- I'm in love.
- Apparently, Google can still be intimidating.
- ... but some people are more equal than others, kn...
- It depends on what you mean by "unity," I guess.
- Big Media ate my brain.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- Grovelling in the Great White North.
- I'm ... speechless.
- Low-hanging fruit, Dr. Roy edition.
- Dodging another gay bullet.
- The selectivity of outrage, Joel Johannesen style.
- Let's call it the "Steve Janke apology."
- Apparently, that whole "capitalism" thingy has its...
- Are we out of Cheeto's AGAIN??
- Pacheco and other illnesses.
- I'm sure Adam's world is a very happy place.
- Why, yes, I CAN politicize anything ... why do you...
- So how's that "surge" going? Part deux.
- Sometimes, it's for their own good.
- So how's that "surge" going again?
- Support the tro... oh, fuck 'em.
- Thursday morning Chester rock open thread.
- The CPoC and NASCAR: A match made at MAACO.
- That Steve Janke is one popular guy.
- You can't make this stuff up.
- Bring the snark, bring the pain.
- The Steve Janke preferential treatment syndrome.
- I'd like to thank the fucking academy ...
- Good boy, Jonathan. Here's a biscuit.
- If you can't count on your Blogging Tory friends ...
- Drinking pragmatically in Waterloo.
- Dear U.S. troops: Make yourselves comfortable ove...
- Life just doesn't get any better ...
- This must represent karmic balance in the universe...
- There's a new troublemaker in town.
- Winning hearts and minds.
- "... and if she buys kippers, it will not rain."
- Monday morning Chester rock.
- How much wingnuttery can you handle?
- Mission acc ... uh, whatever.
- What do Blogging Tories and crickets have in common?
- Saturday night arena rock.
- One of these things is slightly different from the...
- About that "credibility" thing ...
- Dear Olaf: That's quite the crowd you're hanging ...
- Your occasional Joelitude.
- Pot. Kettle. Black.
- Yeah, I've heard that patience is a virtue.
- IOKIYAR -- Part 8,992.
- That is one flexible front line, Tony.
- The bigotry of really low expectations.
- Hermetically-sealed wingnuttia, Joanne-style.
- The wingnuts are coming! The wingnuts are coming!
- Oh, no ... Conservative hypocrisy!
- Oh, puhleeze ...
- And the James Holsinger beatdown just keeps rollin...
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- It's Wednesday, so Joanne must be terribly, terrib...
- Joanne, you ignorant slut.
- This one's gonna be hard to explain away.
- Sometimes, there really might be two sides to ever...
- Simple answers to simple questions.
- Hermetically-sealed wingnuttery, Joanne-style.
- Dear Colin: Piss off.
- Busy Shaved Ape
- Dumb as dirt: The Joanne's Journey story.
- Dear Joanne: Read much?
- Judge to wingnuts: Bite me.
- Yes, Virginia, there is a God ...
- Steve walks warily down the street with the brim p...
- A Kate-sized towel snap to the privates.
- About NAFTA and water ...
- You keep using that word "democracy" ...
- What kind of fuckery is this?
- When casting needs an offensive, homophobic wingnu...
- WTF?
- Apparently, God DOES have a sense of humour.
- I'm "right," for various re-definitions of the wor...
- It's that undercover black man again ...
- Conservatives are just fucking retarded: Part 6,4...
- On the other hand ...
- Holy. Freaking. God.
- Stevie Harper, Statesmanish
- Apparently, they all DO look alike to Kate.
- Awwwwwwwkward ...
- And you started off so well, Mr. Erl.
- My God, I love being right: Part 3,819.
- Pardon me, Scooter?
- We have ALWAYS been at war with Eurasia.
- I have a good memory. It's just short.
- Surge accomplished! Or maybe not.
- "Bob Barker ... come on down!"
- One-upmanship, Pharyngula style.
-
▼
June
(128)
14 comments:
They're already here.
In Alberta, Ted Morton demonstrated that, and his minions are trying to take over the bloated corpse of the PC party...
Hoo boy...Another one whose looks bear testimony to a life bereft of carnal pleasure.
ti-guy, LMFAO!
We have a state religion in Canada. Our Queen (Elizabeth II, in case you don't remember) is also "Defender of the Faith". Which Faith you may ask? Well, the Anglican Church, of course. These people seem to be Dissenters (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Dissenters) come all the way round, or perhaps Baptists, which all acknowledge are not part of the true faith. I propose, if these people insist on a state religion, that we enforce what we have, and in the process declare any Married or Buried in any other religion have not been properly "processed" and their offspring are bastards. (Catholisim will be allowed in Quebec only.) Can't have it both ways, Religious Wingnuts. We will have state religion, but not yours.
Let the pogroms begin
Dear ChristianGovernement -
No. Not as long as I still own a gun, mo-fo.
1. ti-guy: I that a picture of your smiling face?
2. anonymous: that is the best comment you have ever made on this site.
ti-guy: I that a picture of your smiling face?
Are you having such a bad day, Seer, that you had to anti-climax my bons mots with that bit of witless juvenilia?
Try a tobacco clyster. I've heard that works.
Anonymous apparently didn't read the Wikipedia article on the style "Defender of the Faith":
Canada chose to include the title not because the Sovereign is regarded as the protector of the state religion (Canada has none), but as a defender of faith in general
So much for the assertion that Canada has an official religion. (Oh yes, you might try to claim such from the preamble of the Constitution and Charter documents, but it merely refers to God, not to a specific notion of God)
As I said over at TGB, thank God they're stupid or we might actually be in trouble. But I really doubt this is going anywhere.
Yes...the Dominionists have nowhere to go in the Dominion that recognises the supremacy of God.
Ha...hoist by their own petard. Take that, Churchies!
grog, I actually chose to ignore it :)
Shall we discus how many Anabaptists can dance on the head of a Constitutional Lawyer?
If I must belabour my POINT, when these Good Christian Gentlemen (and they are none of the three) speak of Xtian Government, they all see THEIR OWN Xtian Government. The Dissenters (and later the Puritans) realized the only way they could survive without constant strife was (gasp) separate Church and State. Otherwise it is always a question of big enders vs. little enders. Those that want to now amalgamate (become antidisestablishmentanterianists) the two, see a monolithic chuch leading a monolithic state. Mike? Do you have an extra?
Those that want to now amalgamate the two, see a monolithic church leading a monolithic state.
More specifically they all see their particular notion of "Christian" (or whatever) as driving the mores of state. They assume that there is one, singular "correct" faith and all others are erroneous.
Personally, I think if one of them can prove the correctness of their faith with the same mathematical rigor required to declare a computer program "provably correct", then we might start considering their proposals about things beyond their particular faith system.
Dood - just imagine if it was "Vista" Xtianity!
Who would be the hackers?
Our Queen (Elizabeth II, in case you don't remember) is also "Defender of the Faith". Which Faith you may ask? Well, the Anglican Church, of course.
Now wait a minute. Is this the Anglican side that allows homosexual priests, or not? Personally, I hope it is the former, and then little old atheist me will insist that we carry out what you suggest.
LMFAO!
Post a Comment