Wednesday, June 13, 2007
It's Wednesday, so Joanne must be terribly, terribly hurt.
It's not like I want to drag this out any further but, really, there's one point I want to make before moving on and returning to the world of the clinically sane.
If you go back through the last few posts regarding the batshit crazy "Joanne" of the Blogging Tories and check out those original posts of hers (those would be the ones she didn't delete out of sheer embarrassment), you might get the impression that she and most of her loyal, barking fans are incredibly sensitive to intemperate language and it's just painful to their delicate sensibilities and, why, they never, I mean, really, and on and on and tediously on.
All of that is, of course, complete horseshit. It's an act, and nothing more. Consider that these complaints about lack of civility are from people who make an entire career out of writing offensive and insulting posts about gays and immigrants, and referring to people as "shrieking moonbats" and "leftards" and "Lieberals" and "Fiberals", etc, etc. Funny ... that sort of thing doesn't seem to bother them in the least. So what's really going on here? I'm so glad you asked.
As I said, it's all an act. The point of posting such moronic stupidity (such as what Joanne posted) is precisely to get that kind of reaction. For all their talk about dialogue, the last thing the right-wing trogs like Joanne want is to get into a conversation. So their strategy is painfully simple -- post such idiotic rubbish that the immediate knee-jerk reaction is something along the lines of, "Jesus Christ, are you totally fucking retarded or what?" At which point, naturally, you dismiss the complainant as an uncivil, unhinged, deranged moonbat whose actual points can be summarily dismissed, regardless of their merits.
It's a terrific plan, isn't it? It not only allows you to avoid any meaningful discussion of why you're a raving idiot, but it gives all your commenters the satisfaction of being able to sit around and sanctimoniously "Tut tut" about all those nasty leftards and how they can't keep a civil tongue in their head because, as we all know, if someone describes you as an ignorant, bigoted dumbass, well, that's only because they're rude and not because they might, you know, have a point or anything.
I'm sorry -- you need proof? Why not slowly peruse the comments section here to see Joanne and her fans, sitting around patronizingly sighing about how they're the reasonable ones. Yeah, it is a sight, isn't it? And in all of that, not one line of addressing Joanne's original horseshit because, quite simply, that's not the issue anymore, is it? Now it's all about personalities, which is exactly what Joanne was after. After all, why discuss actual issues when you can play the delicate martyr card?
Or, as I was tempted to write initially -- Shorter Joanne: "I'm hurt and offended and insulted by the uncivil and demeaning language and ... ooooooooooo ... traffic!"
AFTERSNARK: If you need a second data point ...
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Wow! Just checked out the linkyou provided to J’s Support Group for the Intellectually and Emotionally Challenged. Joanne sure has “issues.” But like my mom always said, “Past issues explain, but don’t excure.” There is no excuse for her trying to present a self-serving blog as a valid avenue of discussion when it is nothing more than a “please, please, please validate me!” piece of trash selecting items out of context and distorting reality to achieve that goal.
Her RR suppoters call Libs and NDP bleeding hearts? I had to go and vomit after reading that nauseating love-in garbage with all its thank-you-you,re-so-right-those-guys-are-big-meanies-love-me-love-me-love-me syrup.
Love this bit: “ I think most are fostered with families now, but anyway.” (In reference to unwanted children/right to choose) How dismissive of those she wants to regulate based on her morality!
Well, I tried to post what I considered to be a reasonably nice response on her site--focusing on the her follow-up contrasted with the original 'another inconvenient truth', but was given 'comments have been moderated'.
Let's see if it makes it thru moderation.
I never knew--I'm a nitpicker
shocking little tale, CC, some of your 'friends' on the right need to have a little lie down.
You are too stupid for words if you cannot see the difference between your words to Joanne and the usual "moonbat vs. wingnut" invectives tossed around during regular business in these blogs.
Just admit it: you leaped well beyond the boundaries of acceptable behaviour when you called her those names. Time to man up, if you have any semblance of a spine, and apologize.
At the very least, do it for your mother.
Jesus, Dom..you scold more than my granny.
Post a Comment