Saturday, June 09, 2007

Dear Joanne: Read much?


So much Blogging Tory dumbassitude, so little time (emphasis added):

Another Inconvenient Truth

Homosexual activists and their supporters have expressed outrage that a doctor who has warned of the physical dangers associated with homosexual activity would be considered for the position of Surgeon General. Holsinger’s article has been condemned as a scientifically outdated piece of political ideology expressing a “very narrow view” of homosexuality, according to an ABC News report.


H/T Lifesite.

Really, Joanne? Is that why they're upset? Because he just warned of the "physical dangers"? I know -- let's read for ourselves, shall we? (Joanne-smackdown emphasis added)

A doctor tapped by President George Bush for the position of Surgeon General has been attacked by homosexual activist groups for saying homosexual activity is unnatural and unhealthy...

In the paper Holsinger stated that engaging in homosexuality was physically dangerous as well as unnatural behavior.

Isn't it amazing what you can learn if you take the time to follow the links and not take Joanne's word for anything?

TOTALLY GRATUITOUS AFTERSNARK
: Don't say you haven't been warned:

Pointing out the naturally complimentary structure of male and female genitalia, Dr. Holsinger said homosexual sex goes against the natural function of the body and can result in serious injury.

“When the complementarity of the sexes is breached, injuries and diseases may occur,” Holsinger wrote. “From the perspective of pathology and path physiology, the varied sexual practices of homosexual men have resulted in a diverse and expanded concept of sexually transmitted disease and associated trauma.”

Why, yes, and if you can have that kind of "serious injury" and "trauma" with consenting adults, one can only imagine the kind of bad craziness you could get when, say, 13-year-old altar boys are involved. And yet, oddly, that article makes no mention whatsoever of the Catholic Church.

Huh. Go figure.

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE
: And unlike the vast majority of Blogging Tories, Red Tory brings something worth reading to the table.

7 comments:

Ti-Guy said...

I love how Joanne always thinks she's being clever by simply linking to a story and suggesting something's a afoot; namely that opposition to this nomination is largely an issue of "homosexual activism."

Well, it isn't. Holsinger just sounds like a very bad, very incompetent, very ignorant health professional. As a conservative, that should concern her.

What an incomparably stupid person.

Dave said...

Holsinger adeptly avoided discussing the diseases that propagate through heterosexual activity... and Joanne conveniently missed it too. Although... maybe she didn't miss that out of convenience.

BTW, I'm assuming you're playing the irony, but Red Tory is a member of Liblogs and Progressive Bloggers. I don't think the Blogging Tories would have him.

Red Tory said...

Now there's an understatement.

Joanne (True Blue) said...

If you want to do a proper job "Joanne-bashing", you need to do a bit more research, and improve your vocabulary. I would suggest starting with Red's site. Study the language used; especially in comments.

Begin to incorporate phrases such as "cretins", or even better "cretinous bigots", "fawning approval" and.. well, learn from the master of sarcasm and his motley crew of bobbleheads.

KEvron said...

"you need to do a bit more research, and improve your vocabulary."

depsite the dire need, jj nevers seems to admonish her own suck-ups in the same manner....

KEvron

Red Tory said...

Ouch! Cut to the quick by Joanne’s rapier wit. I’m not sure if I’ll ever fully recover.

Interesting to note that she never once addresses the deliberate mendacity of her post. As I said at my place, she’s a homophobic bigot and simply isn’t forthright enough to admit it.

mikmik said...

Yeah, I see you never allowed my comment, JoJo. What, hit to close to the heart with questions of what you actually do for kids, like Fund for Children.
How about my question regarding the Nat Geog. article showing the prevalence of homosexuality in nature, and it's benign (if any) effects on survivability of the species in question?

You are a fucking chickenshit, and no, I didn't call you names in my comment on your sight.
Why don't you show my comment, you fucking chickenshit bullshitter?

learn from the master of sarcasm and his motley crew of bobbleheads.
Yeah, I sure can't learn anything from you, you malevolent, intellectually stunted, miscreant.
NOTHING PERSONAL, I JUST HAVE NO CAPACITY FOR FEEBLE-MINDED HYPOCRICY.
And even less for pusillanimous crybabies that can't even be honest about the feedback you claim you don't get.
Shut the fuck up, JoJo. I am in a particularly foul mood today, or any day I am insulted by spineless whiners spouting hate and intolerance.

Jeeze, thanks CC, that felt good!