Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Joanne, you ignorant slut.
Seriously, I can't think of any better way to describe this example of wretchedly dishonest dumbfuckitude.
Sone friendly advice, Joanne: do not -- I repeat, do not -- try to fence intellectually with people outside your hermetically-sealed, Blogging Tory, wingnut bubble. You're simply not ready for it.
P.S. Don't worry, I'll be coming back to expand on this. When I tear someone a new orifice, I want to make sure you know why.
UPPITY DATE: And he makes it to the corner and tags off ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
Just read Joanne's "Inconvenient Truth". One-sided, piece of prejudical crap comes immediately to mind. This hack appointment of Bush's promotes such absurdity as "ex-gay" therapy and parrots the work of Cameron in many cases. Joanne, if you and your despicable lifesite crowd want to continue degrading gay people you could perhaps maybe I don't know, talk to us and find out the truth about who we are? Your posts completely ignore the fact that the problems that exist in the gay community are equally as rampant in the hetero community, but that's an "inconvenient truth" for you now ist't it. Your ignorance is appalling and quite sad Joanne.
You have to forgive her. Joanne lives among men who would be trolling the Boy's Walk in Toronto if it weren't for their socialised hatred of "the gay." You see, social conservatives need legal restrictions and stigma to prevent themselves from losing control, so they are quick to imagine that other people turn gay because no one's stopping them.
I know...it's nuts.
Well, anyone who argues that Lifesite is a "reliable" news source is suffering from delusions of adequacy.
CC as a gay person I just want to thank you and RT for doing such an excellent job on that wretched bigot. You guys didn't just debone that evil wingnut. You filleted her. Talk about an abject surrender.Woohoo! But of course she's just following the party line. Once they used gay marriage to get at us...now it's just about hating us for who we are...
I wonder if she will publish my comment. I actually gave her something productive to do (Feed the Children Fund) and provided a Nat. Geog. site extolling the prevalence of homosexuality in birds, insects, etc.
Question: How many times do facts have to be presented, how many questions have to be asked, before BloTories and the like stay on topic, thats is, give a straight answer without various deflection and evasion techniques?
Now, here is my point: as far as I know, no known number of attempts have resulted in even a few 'rational' responses, let alone a 'consistently rational' response set. That being the case, isn't it futile trying to use reason with them and, therefore, presenting of an opportunity give them a tiny example of the massive and concerted efforts at disrupting dialogue that their own minions (of the 101 fighting keyboarders) are legendary for?
Who gives a fuck, in other words, if they catch us slinging the odd pejorative, just for the cathartic experience or sheer 'that's what you are, but what am I' childlike display?
After all, we can out example them at 50 to 1, so why should we exempt them from their own type of, to coin a phrase, 'dumbfuckitude'?
Well, some of them are just genuinely ignorant, and it's the informed person's burden to be kindly-disposed to them and never give up trying to reach them.
Others (like Joanne) are just inveterate liars/manipulators and poorly socialised. She is actually my age, but I find her astonishingly juvenile.
Sheesh, I just waded through the comments on that post. Pathetic. I loved this remark she made at one point: “On the plus side, this could be a record day for hits!” Oh, goody gumdrops! Never ONCE does she address any of the criticisms leveled against her.
"Never ONCE does she address any of the criticisms leveled against her."
I was wondering, asshole, how you expect her to address criticisms like "cunt" and "slut"? Does it make you feel tough to call a woman these things? You are a fucking pathetic waste of skin. You are certainly not a man. I'm sure your mother would be so proud.
Oh dear, Conservatives who are upset by CC calling somebody a C*** or a S****.
Don't make me wind up the way-back-machine bucko....
You don't want to go there.
I've got comments locked in my moderator box from conservatives accusing me of being an "ignorant slut" that "squirted out too many bastard children."
And as for more disgusting behaviour... go see the archives of DICK EVANS fame, where he makes jokes about a progressive blogger woman being raped.
Don't even start on this Conservatives are holier than Thou BS.
Meaghan,
The behaviour you speak of is every bit as pathetic as the antics by the goons here. The "men" responsible for it are not worthy of the name.
dom writes:
"I was wondering, asshole, how you expect her to address criticisms like "cunt" and "slut"?"
Here's a piece of advice, dom -- go back and read carefully and note well that Joanne had already ignored all criticism of her post and deleted it, refusing to respond to any and all objections, before I finally decided that she was a complete cretin.
See how that works? Good boy.
Sorry, asshole, it doesn't excuse that kind of language to a woman. Dress it up anyway you like, it is still bullshit.
We'll see if you are capable of shame.
Shut the fuck up, Dom...you cunt. You've never said one sensible thing here once. Just obnoxious scolding and attitude.
Fuck right off.
SLUT?
Careful, can you say "Libel"
You are a laughable little boy. I will call you ti-boy from this point on.
You are a pathetic lickspittle, CC's number one flying monkey, a pathetic toadying arselicker who is incapable of independent thought and so irony-challenged that you presume to accuse your betters of the behaviour and lack of talent you so blatantly display. To be the target of your puny attempts at insult is mildly amusing, at best.
So, ti-boy, toddle off. I'm sure CC has an itch he needs you to lick.
You'll call me "ti-boy?"
Creepy.
Anyway, all that scolding is a little school-marmish, don't you think?
Seriously, why do all of you fudge packers spend so much time chasing after little boys?
Post a Comment