Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2146)
-
▼
June
(128)
- Why, yes, I WAS right again, thanks for asking.
- And, occasionally, the good guys win one.
- The mote in one's eye.
- ... and that's why they call him "the eJankulator."
- The Politically Correct Right
- HAHAHAHA!
- You have to love the irony.
- I'm in love.
- Apparently, Google can still be intimidating.
- ... but some people are more equal than others, kn...
- It depends on what you mean by "unity," I guess.
- Big Media ate my brain.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- Grovelling in the Great White North.
- I'm ... speechless.
- Low-hanging fruit, Dr. Roy edition.
- Dodging another gay bullet.
- The selectivity of outrage, Joel Johannesen style.
- Let's call it the "Steve Janke apology."
- Apparently, that whole "capitalism" thingy has its...
- Are we out of Cheeto's AGAIN??
- Pacheco and other illnesses.
- I'm sure Adam's world is a very happy place.
- Why, yes, I CAN politicize anything ... why do you...
- So how's that "surge" going? Part deux.
- Sometimes, it's for their own good.
- So how's that "surge" going again?
- Support the tro... oh, fuck 'em.
- Thursday morning Chester rock open thread.
- The CPoC and NASCAR: A match made at MAACO.
- That Steve Janke is one popular guy.
- You can't make this stuff up.
- Bring the snark, bring the pain.
- The Steve Janke preferential treatment syndrome.
- I'd like to thank the fucking academy ...
- Good boy, Jonathan. Here's a biscuit.
- If you can't count on your Blogging Tory friends ...
- Drinking pragmatically in Waterloo.
- Dear U.S. troops: Make yourselves comfortable ove...
- Life just doesn't get any better ...
- This must represent karmic balance in the universe...
- There's a new troublemaker in town.
- Winning hearts and minds.
- "... and if she buys kippers, it will not rain."
- Monday morning Chester rock.
- How much wingnuttery can you handle?
- Mission acc ... uh, whatever.
- What do Blogging Tories and crickets have in common?
- Saturday night arena rock.
- One of these things is slightly different from the...
- About that "credibility" thing ...
- Dear Olaf: That's quite the crowd you're hanging ...
- Your occasional Joelitude.
- Pot. Kettle. Black.
- Yeah, I've heard that patience is a virtue.
- IOKIYAR -- Part 8,992.
- That is one flexible front line, Tony.
- The bigotry of really low expectations.
- Hermetically-sealed wingnuttia, Joanne-style.
- The wingnuts are coming! The wingnuts are coming!
- Oh, no ... Conservative hypocrisy!
- Oh, puhleeze ...
- And the James Holsinger beatdown just keeps rollin...
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
- It's Wednesday, so Joanne must be terribly, terrib...
- Joanne, you ignorant slut.
- This one's gonna be hard to explain away.
- Sometimes, there really might be two sides to ever...
- Simple answers to simple questions.
- Hermetically-sealed wingnuttery, Joanne-style.
- Dear Colin: Piss off.
- Busy Shaved Ape
- Dumb as dirt: The Joanne's Journey story.
- Dear Joanne: Read much?
- Judge to wingnuts: Bite me.
- Yes, Virginia, there is a God ...
- Steve walks warily down the street with the brim p...
- A Kate-sized towel snap to the privates.
- About NAFTA and water ...
- You keep using that word "democracy" ...
- What kind of fuckery is this?
- When casting needs an offensive, homophobic wingnu...
- WTF?
- Apparently, God DOES have a sense of humour.
- I'm "right," for various re-definitions of the wor...
- It's that undercover black man again ...
- Conservatives are just fucking retarded: Part 6,4...
- On the other hand ...
- Holy. Freaking. God.
- Stevie Harper, Statesmanish
- Apparently, they all DO look alike to Kate.
- Awwwwwwwkward ...
- And you started off so well, Mr. Erl.
- My God, I love being right: Part 3,819.
- Pardon me, Scooter?
- We have ALWAYS been at war with Eurasia.
- I have a good memory. It's just short.
- Surge accomplished! Or maybe not.
- "Bob Barker ... come on down!"
- One-upmanship, Pharyngula style.
-
▼
June
(128)
9 comments:
I managed three paragraphs, and I can't read any more.
I envy your stomach for these sorts of things, CC.
Yeah, and I made the mistake of starting to read "Violence of left wing bloggers"... LOFL! I decided to check comments, but their either are none, or they say, "This post has been removed by a blog administrator."
Another poorly-socialised Christopath with psycho-sexual hang-ups (check out Nicol Dumoulin's online oeuvre).
Lord...there's a demographic that really needs to stop breeding.
Holy. Fuck.
Where does one begin?
Zuh...uh...buh....
I got nothin'. The guy is obviously reporting straight from Mars.
In a single day, CC, you appear to criticize the Anglican church for rejecting gay marriage, but then deny that liberals are losing ground with American church goers because liberals no longer reflect their sensibilities.
I recommend you pick one position or the other, but not both at once.
Rabbit, how close do you think the vote would have been 20 years ago?
They're not losing ground.
I fail to see what direct connection a vote in the Anglican Church of Canada has with "American church goers," anyway. And besides, the Canadian churchgoers (and clergy) voted for the resolutions. It was only the bishops who didn't, and by a razor-thin margin.
Also, FWIW, it wasn't even about same-sex marriage. It was about the blessing of civil unions, which is a different rite.
I fail to see what direct connection a vote in the Anglican Church of Canada has with "American church goers," anyway.
It's the "new sensible." Every issue is related to every other and therefore, all argumentation is done by comparision, not exposition, with the sole purpose of assassinating character by implying inconsistency or hypocrisy, even when such things are non-existent.
Rabbit: look up "arguing in bad faith."
Post a Comment