Thursday, June 21, 2007
So how's that "surge" going again?
Oooooooooooh ... not so well. On the other hand, there's always the right-wing comic relief ...
OH, DEAR: Take a few hours off and everyone in the sandbox starts throwing sand. I've de-activated comments on this post because I plan on having the last word. So there. More shortly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
111 comments:
THE IRAQ SURGE:
WHY IT'S WORKING ...
By GORDON CUCULLU
Heh. His name is one syllable short of "cuckoo" + "loo-loo."
I swear, the American media must be pulling our legs. These names seem to be right out of Dr. Strangelove.
It's from March. Now they're all telling us to lower our expectations for September.
But articles like that do their job.
Heaven is just a "Friedman" away.
These names seem to be right out of Dr. Strangelove.
They started with Wolf Blitzer and never looked back.
Ah yes. My WONDERFUL government at work.
I wouldn't trust these assholes to park my damned car let alone run this country.
Yet they're still in office because Pelosi is too big a damned coward to impeach Emperor Bush for FISA violations.
So tell me, what the hell is the point of Congress and the Judiciary? Oh that's right, to rubber stamp anything Bush puts in front of them.
They started with Wolf Blitzer and never looked back.
Not to mention the Praetorian General David Petraeus, currently located far south of the Rubicon, subduing the Babylonians and the Assyrians. Did you know his father's name is Sixtus?
Domine!
What's he doing in Ramadi? McCain already walked down a market street in Baghdad, and I don't even think he had any cap on, even a soft one!
'I WALKED down the streets of Ramadi a few days ago, in a soft cap eating an ice cream with the mayor on one side of me and the police chief on the other, having a conversation."
Hmmm, on second thought, he said "in a soft cap", and bejeezes, damn if McCain probably was in a soft one also: skullcap
Anyways, I(we) can see into the future now, and I see a hearty 'two thumbs up' when the good general reviews the 'surge'.
Hmm, on another second thought, were there even any people within a 5 or so block radius from this walk? I allude to McCain, obviously, but we all know better than to take anything these fucks say at face value, and in fact, outrageously facetious facts often remain unspoken whenever a neo-con twit says anything at all. We should be alerted any time feel-good red herrings like 'ice cream' are used by these two-faced creeps because that is almost a for sure sign that the BS meter is overloaded again.
"So how's that "surge" going again?"
I swear, you soft-as-shit moonbats never want to finish anything. For real comic relief, here's an example of your utter lack of strength of will and staying power .
furryasshole,
Wow. Brilliant. You've really demolished the case for peace with that clumsy metaphor.
By the way, that soft, squishy thing inside your pants that makes it hard to sit in front of the computer without sliding from side to side?
One of these days your folks are going to have to get this.
In about a week, you'll be able to think more clearly while you're typing.
I'm glad you're so happy about what you perceive as a US failure, CC, but what you refuse to realize (and CNN hardly acknowledges) is that the US military has just begun a huge offensive operation against al Qaeda. The hint is right there in CNN's first sentence.
It tells something about your military aptitude that you would expect no casualties in such a circumstance. Or is it true that you just want to celebrate US deaths ... well ... because the US is the enemy? And is is true that you have no knowledge of the new offensive?
You're pretty creepy, CC.
E in MD,
You don't get out much, do you?
Your ignorance of US civics is laughable.
Stop cutting school or you won't get to sixth grade.
anonymous writes:
"I'm glad you're so happy about what you perceive as a US failure, CC, but what you refuse to realize (and CNN hardly acknowledges) is that the US military has just begun a huge offensive operation against al Qaeda. The hint is right there in CNN's first sentence."
Shorter A: "Pay no attention to the last five years of utterly failed predictions, thousands of dead American military personnel, an obliterated Iraqi infrastructure and an Iraq spiraling out of control into all-out civil war. This time, we're gonna get it right. Really."
Another six months, right, A?
Who knows? All I said is that there is a reason for the increase in casualties recently, an increase that was expected because of the offensive actions taken by the US.
As far as the other 3,500 deaths since 2003, I am not troubled by them since they are so low -- except insofar as Americans overreact to them and want to retreat from Iraq.
As far as non-Americans like you are concerned, the only rational explanation for your views is that you are eager for a US loss. I know you don't give a damn about 3,500 US deaths, your protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
I swear, you soft-as-shit moonbats never want to finish anything.
And you right-wing armchair generals are ready to brave any danger, tough out any situation -- except admitting you made a mistake.
But no, tell me more about Bush's triumph of the will. Please.
Anonymous says:
As far as the other 3,500 deaths since 2003, I am not troubled by them
but then says:
I know you don't give a damn about 3,500 US deaths
No explanation needed, anonymous. We can take the pointing and laughing from here.
Anon at 8:59: "As far as the other 3,500 deaths since 2003, I am not troubled by them since they are so low"
I think you may see the number as so low in part because neither you nor your friends and family are among them.
A wored about teh 3,500 combat deaths:
These are the deaths "in Iraq." Unless you die "in Iraq," you're not included in the figure for "deaths in Iraq." Which means that if they can get you on the plane to Germany before you die, you have not "died in Iraq." That keeps the death toll articifically low.
Don't forget the mercenaries though.
Even though not even chicken-hawks pretend to care about them.
Still, for the chickenhawks, the mercs are American, dying in a noble cause (that they'd actually hoped to profit from).
I remember on SDA, all the shit-heads saying they wouldn't get excited until the causalites approached Vietnam, or WWII levels.
Man, these defenders of the indefensible are ignorant arseholes, aren't they? Of course, they'll never see combat, so they don't have to worry about being sensible.
Crabgrass, you are the winner the the dimwitted, slightly retarded, if not predictable "chicken-hawk award." Congrats, brain cells. I was waiting for the stupidest man here to weigh in. That didn't take long.
M@, you are the winner of the "I spy a contradiction th@'s not there" award. Try differentiating between my not being concerned about historically low combat deaths and CC's not being concerned about the deaths of Americans except when they provide ammo for his position that America must lose in Iraq.
Seer, you are the winner of the "terrorist propaganda reader" award for believing that US combat deaths are as high as AQ wants everyone to believe and the US is keeping the world in the dark through lies ... lies, lies, lies! ... as if the deaths of American service men can be hidden from the public. Get a life. I bet you get all your news from lefty blogs and Al Jazeera. So, are the deaths ten times the reported amount? Are CNN, the BBC, CBC, et al. in on the cover-up?
Ti-Guy is runner-up to the very clever Crabgrass.
Even among losers he's a loser.
Too bad, Ti-Guy.
Thwap, I see is also pretending to care about American casualties.
Funny how you never hear -- you know -- actual soldiers complaining about chick-hawks. No, only lefty cowards and surrender monkeys complain.
Strange ...
anonymous,
So, you're saying that you're a chicken-hawk, but you don't care, because you never hear soldiers complaining about you?
That's because you're not around the soldiers my dear boy, ... you're a chicken-hawk, safe at home.
Oh, and by the way, you pathetic fucking moron, how do you think the soldiers feel on their extended, repeated, "stop-loss" tours about pro-war fucks of military age who haven't bothered to volunteer, year after year, while the military is being stretched to the breaking-point?
I see you haven't even bothered defending your indefensible "I am not troubled" comment.
At least you have the tactical abilities of an elementary-school student. (Which, up to now, was an open question.)
Why do you think that I'm only "pretending" to care about the troops. I'm not the one who supports them being placed in harm's way and then says that I'm not troubled by the death-toll because it's so low.
You idiot.
Nice mouth, thwap.
"That's because you're not around the soldiers my dear boy, ..."
You don't know what you're talking about, Thwap. Why pretend to know something you don't?
Oh, by the way, you illiterate foul-mouthed adolescent, soldiers continue to re-up in Iraq in impressive numbers. They want to fight for their country. It also happens to be the reason they volunteered to begin with.
One more "fuck" out of you, dimwit, and I won't bother to read what you write, you typical leftist baby. Same language, different pseudonym.
Oh, sorry. I didn't realise it wasn't a contradiction because you're only unconcerned in context. Your lack of concern is political in nature, not screaming-moonie-leftbat in nature, so it's okay. Gotcha.
Christ, you're clever.
By the way, for someone who counsels others not to pretend to know things they don't, you sure know a lot about the thoughts and the motives of the people commenting here. Either you're a super-intelligent student of the human psyche, or you're a thirteen-year-old idiot. I know I've made my guess.
So, anonymous, it's good to see you've still got the sense to slink away from your "I'm not troubled" bit of garbage.
But now I see you're reduced to lying. Tossing out allusions to some sort of military service. Own up to it boy! "Tell a big enough lie" as they say.
But that's pretty awesome about how all the soldiers and National Guardsmen just l-o-o-o-v-e being sent back to that hell-hole that you'd like to leave 'em to die in.
Just like this guy:
http://villagevoice.com/blogs/fahim/2005/02/for_vets_the_fa.php
or this guy:
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2005/03/01/jeff_lucey_returned_from_iraq_a_changed_man_then_he_killed_himself/
or these guys:
http://namguardianangel.blogspot.com/2006/05/forgotten-dead-from-iraq.html
or these guys:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0411-03.htm
I notice you're precious little sensitivities are nonplussed by my profanity.
Huh. I curse, you callously support sending people to kill and die for a failed cause, and you're "not troubled" at the piddly amount of deaths.
Yeah, real nice priorities jack.
You won't read me??? Oh dear! How will I go on??
I'm not really reading you, pal, just enough to respond to make you mad.
You stupid fuck.
You stupid
"Your lack of concern is political in nature ..."
You have it exactly backward, M@. My CONCERN about the deaths is political (but only partly) in nature. As I said, I am concerned that Americans will want to retreat as a result of the 3,500 deaths. My LACK of concern about the deaths is MILITARY in nature. 3,500 deaths do not diminish our ability to fight. Please read more carefully.
BTW, I am a only a SOMEWHAT "intelligent student of human psyche." The problem with you and others here is that you are such sociopaths that you are unable to understand the normal human psyche. And, no, I am not a "thirteen year old idiot." I already own that bit of invective, as I have already pointed out. You all talk like adolescents. You think like adolescents. You emote like adolescents. It doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out what you are.
Thwap,
"So, anonymous, it's good to see you've still got the sense to slink away from your "I'm not troubled" bit of garbage."
What are you talking about? I haven't slunk away from anything.
"But now I see you're reduced to lying."
You are still pretending to know something that you don't.
"Tossing out allusions to some sort of military service."
Did I? Read again.
"Own up to it boy!"
Grow up, Thwap. I know military men. I also know people in the national security arena -- people who do this stuff for a living. I know what the military thinks about people who support the war and who are not themselves in the military. Your very few examples are unpersuasive. Please look up the number of personnel in the United States military for a little perspective.
(I know you children have problems with "perspective," but you should really learn some. No matter how hard it is for sociopaths to learn, it is a worthwhile tool in life.)
Oh, Thwap, I just noticed your last insult was cut off.
Really, thwap: How old are you? What do you do for a living? Do people actually talk to you, or do they studiously avoid all contact with you? Do you have children? Do you use that language around them when you are trying to convince them of something? How about you boss? Your friends? Family? What is your problem? It appears to be significant.
Not only are you a liar, and a callous, troop-hating monster/hypocrite, ... I see you're a liar as well.
You said you wouldn't speak to me if I used profanity again.
But you couldn't resist that bait could you?
And what does it matter if you add lying to your list of vices? It's not like you've got anything to live up to is it?
"I know military men. I also know people in the national security arena -- people who do this stuff for a living. I know what the military thinks about people who support the war and who are not themselves in the military. "
... I get it. And you won't be troubled if they die on some mad, fool mission. Better them than you I suppose.
You really don't know how stupid you sound with each successive entry, do you?
"You said you wouldn't speak to me if I used profanity again."
I was waiting for that. You are nothing if not predictable. One, I hadn't read to the bottom of your rantings until after I posted my response (I think this was made relatively clear in my follow-up post). Two, I'll post when I feel like it.
"Mad, fool mission"?
I don't think it is. It that really so hard to understand? Are you so unable to understand our perspective? (Oh! That word again: "perspective." You really, really should get some.)
Where did I say or imply I hate the troops? I don't. I respect them. Much, much more than you. I know and have met many. I know what kind of men they are. You think you do, but you can't get beyond your leftist stereotypes (like, they're ignorant rednecks, etc.). No, thwap, I bet you lack the intellectual gravitas to understand us non-military supporters of the war. You are the type to believe that everyone who supports the war but who is not in the military is a compromised coward whose opinion doesn't count. What a knucklehead! I wonder if the term "chicken-hawk" applies to all wars in all times. Does it, Thwap? Does it apply to wars that the US is not involved in? Is this a universal concept that is unchanging? Or does it just apply to wars YOU don't like?
To thwap and others of his ilk:
Is a person who supports the war but who is not in the military because he CANNOT be admitted into the military a "chicken-hawk"?
Just wonderin'
I was waiting for that. You are nothing if not predictable.
I knew you were going to say that! You're nothing if not predictable.
"Mad, fool mission"? I don't think it is.
Case closed!
Oh! That word again: "perspective." You really, really should get some.
By which we mean, of course, your perspective. Which is the right one. By definition. Gosh, it's so simple: we'll just think whatever Mr Anonymous Troll tells us to think! Lovely!
Where did I say or imply I hate the troops? I don't.
Where did anyone else say that? Could it be that you're inferring everyone else's troop hatred, just because they don't share your GI Joe fetish?
I respect them. Much, much more than you.
The super-mentalist strikes again! You know, some of us have actually been the troops. In the army. For real-like.
I bet you lack the intellectual gravitas to understand us non-military supporters of the war.
I'll see you, and raise you one you lack the basic critical thinking skills to recognize that what you're doing is rationalizing your own cowardice.
You are the type to believe that everyone who supports the war but who is not in the military is a compromised coward whose opinion doesn't count.
Or maybe it's just you.
Or does it just apply to wars YOU don't like?
Personally, just to people I don't like.
But I'm sure you'll be proven right in the end, Trollmeister. Because if we don't swallow wholesale everything this ridiculous, lying, corrupt administration says, then the terrorists have already won.
".I swear, you soft-as-shit moonbats never want to finish anything. For real comic relief, here's an example of your utter lack of strength of will and staying power .
By furio,"
LMFAO!!! Hey, people, we can now officially link to Onion satire for examples of wingnut stupidity, hahahaaaaaa!
You have said it before, CC, you can't write this stuff.
Hint for furio: That isn't a real story.
"I was waiting for that. You are nothing if not predictable."
Where'd you get that from? A super-hero book?
"One, I hadn't read to the bottom of your rantings until after I posted my response"
Yeah, right.
"(I think this was made relatively clear in my follow-up post)."
???who cares????
"Two, I'll post when I feel like it."
Of course! It's a free country! You aren't bound by your empty "threats"! :)
"You think you do, but you can't get beyond your leftist stereotypes (like, they're ignorant rednecks, etc.)."
Ah! I see you've acquired the mind-reading powers you say that leftists claim to have!
"Is a person who supports the war but who is not in the military because he CANNOT be admitted into the military a 'chicken-hawk'?"
So, you ARE thirteen?? Well me boy, you won't be a "chicken-hawk" then, unless, once of age, you madly cheer-on some other dumbass war, but never muster the courage to sign-up yourself.
It's really rich. Here you are pissing and moaning about how "unfair" we're being to you, but you barged in, commenting on a post about how bush II's latest fuck-up is fucking up, by accusing US of "celebrating" US deaths?
Listen shit-head, your hypocrisy just keeps piling-up and piling-up. You have no credibility. You have no brains. The team you support are chicken-hawks, liars, incompetents and thieves, and it is the height of gall for you to blather-on like anybody gives a shit what you think.
In case you missed the fucking words right before your very own stupid eyes, Petraeus, who the NY Post was describing as supremely confident in March, is now saying that nothing substantial will be improved by September, and that US forces will be dying (for what? WMDs that don't exist? sham democracy that creates anger and more terrorism?) ... in Iraq FOR YEARS:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/17/AR2007061700830_pf.html
Do you get it now dipshit??? After four fucking years of carnage, you don't get to explain away the failure of a troop "surge" [that was supposed to solve everything remember] by mewling about how it "takes time" to achieve results.
Fuck you and your imaginary military friends and your adolescent political analysis.
And fuck you and your easy dismissal of those tragic stories of soldiers' suicides, and PTSD and everything else.
Or is that something else you're "not troubled" by, you revolting turd?
You don't know what your talking about, thwap, beginning with the word,"where'd" and ending with "turd." You emote and rant and rage but say nothing. Your views on the war are worth nothing. Every "shit, and "fuck" you spew; every false quote of mine you make up ("unfair"); every uniformed rant against a "surge" that you clearly cannot understand tells me you are not worth the effort. You are a lost cause. An insecure and insulated blow hard who cannot come up with anything better than "you are a chicken-hawk" (defined by you as you see fit) and "Iraq is a lost cause (because I want it to be)."
What an angry little man you are. "Fuck! Fuck! Fuck! Fuck! Shit!" Why don't you answer some of my questions, potty mouth? I'd love to know what what kind of slithering creature you are. You are like a car wreck ... or the madman spouting nonsense on the street corner.
anon 10:28: "Ti-Guy is runner-up to the very clever Crabgrass."
HAA! Ti_Guy!! I kicked your sorry ass. I guess you won't be skulking around here any more.
I rule.
By the way, anonymous, thanks for posting that schematic diagram for the tube radio on that other blog.
And for the soup recipe. That was you, right?
Anon: "every uniformed rant against a "surge" that you clearly cannot understand tells me you are not worth the effort."
I love a rant in uniform.
Stop swearing anonymous. You're upsetting me.
"You emote and rant and rage but say nothing. Your views on the war are worth nothing."
Nyah, nyah, nyah! I am rubber you are glue, it bounces off me and sticks to YOOOO!!!
fuck off!!! ;)
No joke too silly.
Wow, thwap! Trollini really socked it to you there! THWAP! Hoo, boy!
Do me next, Troll-man! Do me!
Crabgrass, do try to sober up so we can understand what you're talking about.
Never!!
anonymous is jealous because he isn't old enough to drink yet!
m@,
Get your own troll!
"Anonymous"!! Stop jerking-off with those 'Cheet-o's" (tm) - stained hands!!! FRONT AND CENTER BOY!!!!
Hey, dude, I responded to him first. He's rightfully mine.
But don't worry -- I'll share! He's trolly enough for all of us.
You think your swearing is "upsetting" me? You think I find it shocking or it hurts my delicate sensitivities? You couldn't be more wrong.
Haven't I made my position clear? My bad. It seems to be that leftists try to get some degree of machismo that they so sorely lack by cussing like tough guys. Sorry. It doesn't work.
No, kiddies. I just think it's retarded.
Group hug.
It seems to be that leftists try to get some degree of machismo that they so sorely lack by cussing like tough guys.
Whereas rightists get their sexual arousal from pointless moralizing and their GI Joe fetish.
I'll take swearing, myself. I figure it'll be a little less embarrassing for me when I grow up and think back to when I was young.
"Jerking off!" Good one, Thwap! You got me and have proven to one and all that you are a man.
Your mother must be proud. You guys are so fucking awesome. The finest in Canadian juvenilia. Who says Canadians are the most boring and insecure people on the planet? This stuff is pure gold. Between you people and Celine Dion, it is clear that Canada is brimming over with talent.
anonymous,
you were the crying bitch who complained about the cussing, remember dipshit???
And i suppose you get your "machismo" by claiming to be "not troubled" by the deaths of US soldiers "as they're so low"?
Wow. Really tough. Rilly mah-chooo!! I'm all-a-flutter in your presence! Sho-nuff!!
M@,
Okay. "Finders-rights" and all. This guy's a bit of dud anyway. (In more ways than one, hint-hint!)
"GI fetish"? I thought we didn't care about the troops -- what, with sending so many to fight useless wars, we are supposed to hate the soldiers.
Get your insults straight.
Anon, you might think some of us unkind, but be thankful we're soft on truancy.
Crabby, I think of you as RETARDED ... as I've said before. Retards are neither kind nor unkind. They are just retards.
Richard Evans, is that you?
BTW, how do you know nobody here has ever served? I am willing to bet you are wrong...
"[H]ow do you know nobody here has ever served? I am willing to bet you are wrong..."
Mike, (1) you are too late. You missed the train; we are in pure insult territory now. (2) I never said or implied that no one here never served. (3) I don't care if any did; it is irrelevant.
Oh ... and keep guessing.
You do have a GI-fetish anonymous.
Dead GI's.
Such a sick mind for such a young pup.
"GI fetish"? I thought we didn't care about the troops
There's a difference between caring about someone, and masturbating while looking at their picture. Your troops-fetish is in the second category.
I don't care if any did [serve]; it is irrelevant.
Well it is to people who support wars from their armchairs and read minds to determine who does and doesn't hate the troops.
To those of us in the reality-based community, it is indeed relevant.
"Jerking off," "masturbating": You boys wouldn't be projecting, would you? You seem to be a little too -- shall we say? --- interested in self-abuse.
With everything you write, you convince me more and more that you (1) haven't grown up, (2) can't get any (except with yourselves with a little help on the WWW), (3) are profoundly insecure, (4) and are deeply embarrassed by these things.
and everything you write shows you to be someone who is "not troubled" by the deaths of soldiers "as they are so low."
You said it and you can't take it back.
That's what you get when you try to sound like a tuff guy.
m@ said it ages ago:
"No explanation needed, anonymous. We can take the pointing and laughing from here."
That's all we've been doing with you since then.
But you seem to be a glutton for punishment. I'm getting bored, as I suspect others are, and you might out-last us.
Then this comments section will be all yours, to scream and scream your pretty little head off in.
So to the self-styled "reality based community" [trying not to giggle here], one's opinion is relevant to the issue of supporting the war only (1) if you were or are in the military or (2) if you ... don't support the war.
Makes sense ... if you're "realty based" or you've free-based, I guess
Thwap, as much as you'd like to believe otherwise. The only one who has been "screaming" here is you, Mr. "fuck! fuck! shit! you "dipshit!"
Holy shit, Anonymous, you read me like a book.
But, you know, I gotta tell you - oh gee, look at the time!! Gosh, how did it get so late?? I'm, uh, ...just gonna grab another drink and then head out. Take care...
Christ, ... "Yawn!" ... like i said, ... getting worn down, ... "anonymous" ... too strong! .... gasp! ... swears too much!! .... can't compe ---
[!!!!]
You seem to be a little too -- shall we say? --- interested in self-abuse.
And you seem a little too interested in abusing yourself in public, the way you're carrying on here. But don't worry, we've all been to the primates exhibit at the zoo. Nothing we haven't seen before.
the self-styled "reality based community"
Actually "reality based community" was a phrase used by someone high up in the Bush administration to describe those opposed to Bush. But I'm betting you don't read a lot of newspapers so it probably slipped by you.
one's opinion is relevant to the issue of supporting the war only (1) if you were or are in the military or (2) if you ... don't support the war.
No one said anything of the kind. I, for one, said that whether people served in the military was relevant to the argument. If you want to go on showing how your opinion is irrelevant, hey, go nuts. Um, more so.
Or I guess we're supposed to take the opinions of an anonymous member of the 101st Fighting Keyboarders, trolling his way around the intertubes, as gospel truth.
Thwap,
How many more posts will you make telling us you are bored?
Just wonderin'
"[You are] an anonymous member of the 101st Fighting Keyboarders .."
I am? Wh@ made you arrive @ this conclusion, M@? Do you think you might be wrong?
Heh... Trollinis. So white trash.
The trolls pretty much indicate the demographic the Republicans are recruiting for the US Army, which not only explains why they continue to fail, but also explains Abu Ghraib.
I wonder if 'nonny here has a fetching haircut like Lynndie England?
*cue banjo music*
Oh and.... shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits.
Wow! You people are amazing. Absolutely awesome to behold.
As I said earlier, the stuff you kiddies write is "the finest in Canadian juvenilia. Who says Canadians are the most boring and insecure people on the planet? This stuff is pure gold. Between you people and Celine Dion, it is clear that Canada is brimming over with talent.
Bye.
(Maybe.)
Too late, Ti-Guy, we've already dealt with the leftist "redneck soldier" stereotype. You're friends deny it exists.
Tooooo tooooo late.
Always coming in second, aren't you Ti-Guy?
Que lastima.
OK ... now: Bye!
(Maybe.)
But for you, Ti-Guy, definitely, "Bye!"
You two-time loser you.
I am? Wh@ made you arrive @ this conclusion, M@? Do you think you might be wrong?
Not for a second. I'm as right as you are about what other people think, and why they think those things.
Bye.
Aw, so soon? I was beginning to enjoy your spittle-flecked tirades. All good things must end, though.
(Wait'll CC comes in and see the mess in this thread! Thwap did it.)
bye anon!
Don't let the deaths of your countrymen get you down!
Oh, I forgot:
"As far as the other 3,500 deaths since 2003, I am not troubled by them since they are so low "
They don't.
Asshole.
Bye?
¡Qué lástima!
Get it right, trash.
Ti-Guy,
You so smart with your Google translator!
Yeah, and I speak five languages.
Oh, don't get so snitty, trash. I'm sure you're good at something. Knocking up your cousin, maybe?
Don't worry, Thwap. I'm fine. Thanks for your concern, though, Mr. Fuck! Fucking fuck shit, asshole!"
Bye.
Yeah, Ti-Guy, you speak so many languages that I can't help but be impressed. Wow wee. Really: Congratulations to you.
You still used Google translator, though, phony. No sense in denying the obvious.
Are you bored, thwap?
Tell me again.
New York City must be out of thorazine again.
¡Qué lástima!
You're there then, I assume.
Return to Canada for your cheep drugs, courtesy of the US consumer.
You're welcome.
Sure, I meant "cheep."
I can't go to New York. I'm on the no-fly list.
Good. The US will not miss you I am sure.
What I'm not sure about is your complaint about the shortage of your favorite medication.
But I don't care. It may make sense to you. But. I. Don't. Care.
So, drop it.
Good. The US will not miss you I am sure.
Now that's just mean. Honestly, one could almost say you are ill-bred.
¡Qué lástima!
Hey Crabby...I think I'm beating you. The trollini hates me more...so there!
Scene: a bedroom with a computer. Anonymous lies prone on the floor. He pounds fists and little buckled-up shoes on floor whiles screaming.
ANONYMOUS
I don't care! I don't care! I. Don't. Care! Waaaaah! (Continues crying for some minutes before realising there's no answer.) And he said a swear, too! (sniffles)
Aaand scene.
M@, you certainly live in a interesting fantasy world.
Ti-Guy, you too ("Nonny hates me! Hooray, I'm somebody now! He hates me!") But, then, you always have, I bet.
I always have...what?
Re-read, correct and re-submit, please.
And you're still a nobody, Ti-Guy.
Sorry I'm so mean, but the truth must be told.
... have lived in a fantasy world.
De nada.
Anon, do you really hate ti-guy more than me? Tell the truth. Set me free. I can take it.
M@,
Re your attempt at play writing, you ...
Oh ... never mind I see you are a TECHNICAL writer who loves "Star Wars." I see where your coming from.
My apologies mucho.
Lo siento.
Children, children:
Nonny doesn't hate you. You are so special to Nonny. You are special children. You have special needs and Nonny only wants what's best for you.
Today's lesson is: "Perspective" and how to argue without saying "Fuck, fuck fucker, fucking dipshit motherfucking cunt asshole!"
Can we have ice cream?
Yes, of course you can. What flavor?
Fuck Flavour!!!
Hahahahahahaha...
*drool*
Ti-Guy has forgotten the lesson of the day already.
But now I am no more anonymous than Ti-Guy. Or thwap. Or Crabgrass. Or CC. Or M@
Are all you children happy now?
I didn't even realize that "Fuck" was a flavour. I guess Baskin-Robbins isn't so shit-hot after all. Bastards... 31 flavours my ass.
I'll have Mint Black Helicopter with a waffle cone.
I haven't been to a Baskin-Robbins in years. Is it still around?
"Fuck" is a flavor once thwap and M@ work their "magic" at the ice cream store, apparently.*
100
* See thwap at 1:10PM, and M@ @ 1:18 and 1:35, above.
This is like watching a treading water contest. I'm in for $5 on Ti-Guy.
GLUG... MGAhhh! I'm okay, I'm okay...
Shit.
David, it depends on what your bet is. Will Ti-Guy drown first, drown last, or be carried up by the angels?
Carried up by the angels?
You know ... saved ... deus ex machina stuff. Cheat death and all that.
Huh?
Read the thread, starting with David's comment.
Jesuschrist, look at this place!
Thwap, Ti-Guy, Crabgrass, m@, I'm lookin at you. You were told you couldn't have a puppy if you didn't look after it and now look - you didn't even put paper down.
CC is going to be some pissed with you guys when he gets home.
It's not our fault...we fed it pet food from China and it got explosive diarrhea.
I'm not lying.
*runs away*
Post a Comment