Sunday, June 24, 2007

Let's call it the "Steve Janke apology."

Shorter John Pacheco: "I apologize for being gauche, tasteless and insensitive but, hey, it happens when you're right, ya know."

Steve would be so proud.


Anonymous said...

Pacheco had the nads to apologize for a tasteless comment. What about you, shithead? Let's recall: "And regarding the name-calling, well, here's a thought, Joanne: If you don't want to be described as an ignorant, hateful, dishonest, homophobic cunt, try not acting like one. It's just a thought, you know." And not a fucking word of apology for that shit.

But somehow, in that flyshit sized brain of yours, a fuck-up who at least had the bag to own up to his crap is worthy of scorn because his apology doesn't measure up to your fucking standards? What a complete and total fuck wad you are!

Rev.Paperboy said...

CC and PSA,
From the preponderence of dumbass trolls that seem to be coming by lately to foul the comment threads, your site has clearly made some sort of breakthrough and become a sufficiently large thorn in the side of dumbass conservatives. Well done.

Anonymous said...

Fuck that. Joanne and her "Journey" needed that. Go fuck yourself Anon - Pacheco is a moronic bigot and so is Joanne. Someone has to smack back into shape.

No apologies for that!

M@ said...

"And not a fucking word of apology for that shit."

Ever notice how your shit is stuff, and everyone else's stuff is shit?

That's George Carlin, btw. You, sir, are about as fresh as a George Carlin punchline.

Oh, and fuck shit ass. Feel better? I know I do.

Anonymous said...

I'm following the initial commentator's post:

CC comes down hard on right-wing asshole for some lame defence of fascism, and he uses profanity.

And he doesn't apologize.

Somebody else tastelessly uses news about another person's battle with breast cancer to speculate and pontificate about her personal life.

And apologizes.

And the initial commentator is a fucking moron.

Ti-Guy said...

I hope anonymous no.1 apologises for that rather intemperate and foul-mouthed rant.

...It was most upsetting.

Anonymous said...

thwap, if you would take your head out of your ass, you would see that the motivations of the individuals in question ( CC, Pacheco ) is immaterial to my point. Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it. The other one, the gutless one, has the nerve to cast ridicule at the first for his less-than-stellar apology, when he himself cannot work up the nads to do likewise for his behaviour.

Is this too subtle for you?

Anonymous said...

Or, thwap, do you believe that calling a woman a "cunt" is acceptable if you really, really disagree with her opinion?

Anonymous said...

Too subtle for me?

Nah, too incoherent and stupid. I've already explained it for you, ... figure it out.

Re: The "C" word. I think it's a bit strong. But "CC" used it to make a point about right-wing pseudo-feminists who called "Status of Women Canada" - "SOWs".

I don't agree, but it's not as if he's a holocaust denier like you guys tend to be. Or savage,homophobic closet cases, ... or economic dipshits, ... warmongers, racists, and losers.

Ti-Guy said...

Both made "gauche, tasteless" remarks and only one apologized for it.

Now that's moral relativism at its finest.

¢rÄbG®äŠŠ said...

Anonymous 11:37PM, at the risk of coming across as pedantic, I believe "fuckwad" is one word.

Chimera said...

"Or, thwap, do you believe that calling a woman a "cunt" is acceptable if you really, really disagree with her opinion?"

Only if she is one...