Me thinks they have this backwards-- "to the Christian vision for a free and democratic social order and a civil government committed to the rule of law and the principle of equality before the law. Tyranny never could survive against liberty and justice." Since when have these 'Christian vision' types been for equality before the law? I mean we hear about it on an almost daily basis--homosexuals are *not* equal before the law--they are really second class citizens not entitled to the same rights and privileges as heterosexuals. Social order? Sure, as long as the order goes from the white patriarch and down from there. If and when 'Christian vision' type people actually practice what they preach, then they may be worth listening to--'that which is done to the least of you...'. Until such time, get off the stage.
"...the Marxist vision of man without God must eventually be seen as an empty and a false faith..."
"...Only by building a wall of such spiritual resolve can we, as a free people, hope to protect our own heritage and make it someday the birthright of all men..."
Uhm, isn't building a wall what the Marxists did? To protect their heritage and make it someday the birthright of all men?
Very democratic, that making their idea of the world the birthright of all men. Doesn't echo what they allegedly despise at all. Newpnewpnewp. And I am sure they mean that literally, since women's only birthright is anticipating how to please men in every way and accept loving correction when they're not psychic enough to just KNOW.
5 comments:
Me thinks they have this backwards--
"to the Christian vision for a free and democratic social order and a civil government committed to the rule of law and the principle of equality before the law. Tyranny never could survive against liberty and justice."
Since when have these 'Christian vision' types been for equality before the law?
I mean we hear about it on an almost daily basis--homosexuals are *not* equal before the law--they are really second class citizens not entitled to the same rights and privileges as heterosexuals.
Social order? Sure, as long as the order goes from the white patriarch and down from there.
If and when 'Christian vision' type people actually practice what they preach, then they may be worth listening to--'that which is done to the least of you...'.
Until such time, get off the stage.
You belong to a great club no CC, if I do say so myself...
;-)
These folks are Christian Reconstructionists. (Think Texas style wingnuts) Look out, since they don't think the CofE is "christian" enough for thee.
Oy (pun intended!).
The only reason why Secular Humanism is making gains ...
Eeee-HAHHH!!!!! Nothing else matters after that!
"...the Marxist vision of man without God must eventually be seen as an empty and a false faith..."
"...Only by building a wall of such spiritual resolve can we, as a free people, hope to protect our own heritage and make it someday the birthright of all men..."
Uhm, isn't building a wall what the Marxists did? To protect their heritage and make it someday the birthright of all men?
Very democratic, that making their idea of the world the birthright of all men. Doesn't echo what they allegedly despise at all. Newpnewpnewp. And I am sure they mean that literally, since women's only birthright is anticipating how to please men in every way and accept loving correction when they're not psychic enough to just KNOW.
Sic 'em, CC/PSA.
Post a Comment