skip to main |
skip to sidebar
There’s ballsy ...
And then there’s Five Feet of Pick Your Prejudice™. Apparently, her
shameless classless begging ingenuity when it comes to having everyone else pick up the tab for her endless mouthing-off free speech battle royale truly knows no limits.
Holy tap-dancing Jesus ... monthly donations.
Have you noticed that she's still misrepresenting why she's being taken to court.
Ahh ... but perception is everything.
KKKate, Better-than-Ezra and Five Feet of Pick Your Prejudice™ (and their various and sundry mouthbreathing supporters) all perceive this as some Free Speech crusade so that's how they spin it.
It's unfortunate that reality keeps getting in the way.
Kate is the only smart one of the lot. She at least took down the offending post, and hasn't been doing much blogging on this EXACT topic.
Ezra, Kathy and the FD Crowd have been piling on and slagging Warman at every turn. While the Judge might forgive Kathy and the people at FD for this stupidity, the same will not be said for Ezra. Ezra is a lawyer and should know better. If Judge finds Ezra did Defame Warman, Warman will easily be to prove Malice because of Ezra's continuous blogging on the subject and because Ezra heavily moderates his blog and allows throught anti-Warman comments all the time. If the Judge rules against Ezra, he bleed Ezra' defend fund dry and then tack on extra damages on top of that.
Ezra had best hope and pray that he wins, else the Judge will put Ezra into the poor house.
Exactly Lulu, in court the Judge isn't going to want to hear that crap and will not allow it. This will be a Defamation case, not a free speech case.
If they lose, it is going to cost them big time.
The only one in my opinion that should not found guilty is Kate, yet if Kate loses the Judge will also bleed her defence fund completely dry as well.
Ezra article yesterday about how insane it for claim that Warman is sueing them for HTTP links and acting like this a completely new form of insanity demonstrates that Ezra is either ignorant of current case law or worse. When I point this out yesterday on his blog, he refused to allow the comment to be posted. It almost seems like he wants to mislead his readers, but that would dishonest and we all know how Ezra is about honesty and free speech and all that, so I sure there must be another explaination as to why he didn't allow my comment,... I just can't figure out what that reason could be.
I also read Kathy and Kate's filed defense papers yesterday, the Defense is setup to nail Kathy to cross and allows Kate the greatest chance to walk. Kate is obviously footing the bills here and Kate is providing maximum CYA for herself (don't blame her, it was Kathy that was ultimately responsible in the end) Poor Kathy doesn't even see that Kate is getting ready to throw her to the dogs if it means she can walk.
Poor Kathy doesn't even see that Kate is getting ready to throw her to the dogs if it means she can walk.
There is no honor amongst thieves - offhand, I'll guess that the same rule exists here.
the Defense is setup to nail Kathy to cross and allows Kate the greatest chance to walk
Of course it is!
Catherine owns the farm no? And operates a business? Plus has whatever she gets from adsense.
Kathy has no income, and probably rents her place. She could have transferred any assets she has to her new husband, who conveniently can't be garnished or forced to surrender assets.
Seems pretty easy to decide how to proceed to me.
Snicker. One born every minute.
I might be inclined to give Kathy a monthly donation, so long as she promises to spend it on copious amounts of alcohol. For some reason I think Kathy Shaidle is one of those recovering alcoholics that you wish would take up drinking again. It would infintely improve her disposition.
Do the donors not find anything ironic in sites festooned with paypal buttons and pleas for money, while the bloggers in question are describing their spa visits, firearms acquisitions, restaurant dinners, Vegas holidays, and so on?
Of course not, balby. It's always okay if you're a conservative. Plus, it also allows them to retain the delusion that they all live better than us moonbat lefties (even when they have to beg for spare change).
You mean this post zorph?
Nope still up, your research skills are about as good as your legal acumen.
But keep dreamin.
Well BCF, Kate has made a mistake then, but thank, I stand corrected, Kate has left the post up.
Yes, BCF ... let's talk about "research skills," shall we?
Are you sure you want to make that comparison, BCF? Seriously.
Post a Comment