JJ has words of wisdom:
Oh boo hoo hoo. Everything with these people is "the end of (fill in the blank) as we know it"... it has to be those apocalyptic religious beliefs.
And it really is that way, isn't it? For instance, people on the Left who criticize wankers aren't just, say, annoying gadflies or irritating whiners; no, they're inevitably shrieking, raving, deranged, psychotic moonbats.
If you're a staunch conservative, same-sex marriage can't just be something you disagree with or that you find distasteful. Fuck, no, SSM is a hideous travesty of natural law and will destroy the sanctity of traditional marriage and the very foundations of Western civilization itself.
If you talk about desecrating a communion wafer, you can't just be, say, a classless boor or something like that. God, no, it's a "hate crime" and "beyond hate speech".
And if you like to mock total imbeciles on a public blog, well, there's no possible way you can just be, say, rude and intemperate. Shit, no, you are suddenly a clear and present danger to the children and open to arrest. Or something totally fucking retarded like that.
Really, there's no grey area for these people, is there? Everything is screaming, panty-tugging, urine-soaked fear and panic, regardless of the topic. After a while, it really does get a bit tedious to listen to, doesn't it?
13 comments:
Really? Is that really coming from the guy who suggested people track down Richard Evans' kids at their school?
Let's just go over this again, because I want to make sure I have this straight:
No only do you feel no shame in bullying Chris Erl not despite of but on the grounds of being a high school student, but you also think people should be tracking down the Evans kids where they go to school.
And let's keep in mind that you have the nerve to label me a "cyberstalker".
You -- the guy who encourages people to track down a political opponent's children at their school -- as compared to me -- the individual who has advised those taking an interest in your identity to, for the love of god, leave your home address the hell out of it.
Not only are you the single most intellectually dishonest individual the Canadian blogosphere has to offer, but beyond a shadow of a doubt the most hypocritical as well.
And to think you do it all in the name of hatred. And you wonder why people (absolutely accurately) label your blog a hate site?
Well, that's clever, Twatsy ... linking to the same blog post. Why did I ever expect anything different?
And while I could, if I wanted to, dissect Twatsy's stupidity slowly and methodically, I'm going to close the book on this bullshit issue once and for all, thusly.
No one can accuse me of harassing Richard Evans or his family for one painfully simple reason: Evans explicitly invited me to do so.
That's it. Case closed. End of discussion.
Go on ... ask me to prove that. Make my day.
PR:
For the seventeenth time:
Do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?
Yes or no?
"No one can accuse me of harassing Richard Evans or his family for one painfully simple reason: Evans explicitly invited me to do so."
That's an incredibly facetious comment. It's beyond dishonest, and you fucking well know it.
You're a deeply sick and disturbed individual.
You're a deeply sick and disturbed individual.
Patrick, you're projecting again - you might want to work on that with your therapist.
liberal supporter - OK, this is funny. PR won't answer your question because he says he's already answered it. And yet...
He keeps asking me the same questions over & over, which I've answered not just once but umpteen times already, and he's mad because I won't answer the same questions, yet again. This shows, in his mind, that I am afraid to answer the questions.
I guess that means he must be afraid to answer your question?
Heh ... I just knew Twatsy would walk face-first into that woodchipper. I think I'll let him twist in the wind for a couple hours before I supply the evidence.
P.S. Hey, Twats ... any plans on apologizing for that blatant lie you wrote regarding me and Mr. Erl? Come on, Twats ... you can't possibly deny that you got that situation completely backwards. Let's go ... a grovelling public apology might do you some good.
I'm waiting ...
Hmmmmm ... that certainly shut Twatsy down in a hurry. I'm guessing he's busy drafting that grovelling public apology for lying about me. Yeah, that must be it.
He also lied about RedTory.
Add that to the list things to apologise for, won't you Twats?
There's a dear.
You're a deeply sick and disturbed individual.
Well yes, Patrick you are... next.
... people on the Left who criticize wankers aren't just, say, annoying gadflies or irritating whiners; no, they're inevitably shrieking, raving, deranged, psychotic moonbats.
I await a demonstration that deranged, psychotic moonbats never engage in irritating whining.
Well, isn't that special ... no Twatsy blustering and fuming and sputtering for a while now. Writing that public grovelling apology must be taking him longer than I thought. I can't wait to read it.
... panty-tugging, urine-soaked fear ...
When the Watchtower people come to the door (not so much, lately) I always notice that their magazine features as a cover story some fear inducing topic like a meteor destroying the earth, or AIDS, or violence in children's sports.
Not unique to religion, the tactic of arousing fear, anger, hatred and other nasty emotions is used by everybody and his dog because it works. You have to be an extraordinary leader and speaker to stimulate people with love, hope, caring and understanding, but the opposite tactic only needs a bullhorn and a total absence of shame. It's built into our hardware.
Post a Comment