Tuesday, March 11, 2008
When really stupid bloggers attack: The Patsy Ross story.
Let's keep this short and sweet. First, there's this. Take your time and read it carefully, so you truly understand the parameters of the challenge. Got it? Good.
Now, God help you, read this. Again, read it slowly and carefully to truly appreciate the stupidity. But, wait, that's not fair, so let's ponder how to deal with this.
Obviously, it would be grossly unfair if I were to judge whether Patsy had won the challenge, so we can't let that happen. But who? And, for me, the answer is obvious.
I just sent off an e-mail to James Bow, with whom I've had some correspondence on occasion, and who recently was the runner-up as Mr. Non-Partisan in the 2007 Canadian Blog Awards. And since James has a reputation as being scrupulously fair and even-handed, I'm hoping he'll offer to act as judge in this little spat.
If he does, then the protocol is simple. He'll read the challenge carefully, then he'll examine Patsy's submission. And if he thinks Patsy has satisfied the requirements of the challenge, I'll pay up. If he doesn't, then Patsy can go suck eggs.
Fair? Now we're just waiting on James. I'll keep you posted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
(quietly munches popcorn)
KEvron
See - what'd I tell you? I go into virtual lockdown and everybody loses their minds. Not that Patsy, that corpulent, mullet-sporting fucktard had much of a mind to lose in the first place ... but I digress.
Hi KEv
Ah, too precious.
I think in TV-land this what's referred to as "cross-talking"...
I have this to say to pres Bush and vice Dick: Fuck you and your insane lies about WMD that have caused, so far, 100's of thousands of innocent deaths. Etc ad infinitum...
Yeah, like I am seriously talking to those two fuckheads. As fucking if! Isn't it some sort of editorial licence or manner of speach that isn't meant to be taken as a literal message to the fuckups in question, like rhetorical question or sumthin'?
Isn't this the same Patty who, at Red Tory's last July, spoke thusly:
As for the rest of you, your not-so-humble victor bids you adieu. This will be my last comment here.
Monday, July 23, 2007 7:34:00 PM
Now that Patrick Ross had a blogger profile ID of 04592482865332628189. And so does the current one. What are the chances that Patrick Ross deleted his profile, and some other Patrick Ross started a blog and just happened to get the same random number assigned as his profile ID?
Meanwhile in Iraq, it has been determined that it is "likely" the WMD's were actually transferred to Syria. "The chances that this happened are very high", said President Bush, "it is estimated at one chance in 4,592,482,865,332,628,189. A very high probability indeed."
Or we could use Occam's razor and presume Patrick is a LIAR.
[NOTE TO Canada's Stupidest Bloggers: The phrase Occam's razor is a figure of speech. Please google it before calling the police to report you have again been threatened by a liberal with a weapon.
I'm embarrassed to have to point that out to you.]
aka "Git a job looosers"
Glad you put that note in, LibSup, in case Patsy started wondering why he had never read or heard of this Occam person's blog before.
Who needs a memory when there are good folks like LS around to recall everything for you? ;)
Post a Comment