Sunday, January 24, 2010
How does it feel being played for a sucker?
As much as I have way better things to blog about, let me refresh your memory. And the fallout?
Robert McClelland gets it. Section 15's Mark Francis is a bit miffed in being taken advantage of. And what's particularly grating about those two is that they are named specifically in a recent post by Mr. Ross as progressive bloggers who told me to take a hike regarding my "ultimatum." How ... dishonest.
I'm dead serious about my new policy. Whether or not you choose to publish Patrick Ross is entirely your decision, but if you do, you'll do it with no further linky love from me. But while you're at it, you might want to drop by Patrick's and check out his recent post where he enumerates all those progressive bloggers who allegedly support him -- in particular, the ones he lists as supporters who might not have a clue as to what's going on. Then you can decide how you feel about your name being taken in vain.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
Go away, Patrick. Take your infant-sodomizing fantasies elsewhere.
Oooo. Twatsy's making a list of enemies, is it?
At DJ! we just stopped accepting his comments because (pick any two) they are fatuous, goading, stupid, misogynist, preening, creepy, etc.
We certainly didn't do it because CC told us to. We wouldn't do anything CC told us to do.
Well, OK. We might follow instructions if they were along the lines of 'Drink up. The next round's on me.'
What part of "go away" so totally eludes you, Patrick? Go talk about fucking two-year-olds with some of your friends. If you have any left.
I just turned comment modification on as I'm not sure how to ban a commenter on wordpress.
Just read his silly post and He does have a bad case of sour grapes.
I guess if the Blogging Tories don't even have him with their wanker club playing reindeer games, he really does have a serious problem.
He's just dropped a steamer at my place. Gone.
I'm guessing you're next on Patrick's enemies list, Dawg. He seems to building up quite a collection over at Chez Twatsy.
Apparently, Patrick's strategy is to keep harassing me with comments, even after he's been told he's no longer welcome. There's something psychologically damaged about that boy.
CC:
You were remarkably prescient.
In what way? The only prediction I would have made that is a positive no-brainer is that, while Ross thought that a blogger supported him, that blogger would have been a fair and objective voice of moderation and principle.
The instant he learns that said blogger now supports me, that same blogger is now a worthless, gutless, unprincipled hack and toadying sycophant who will now be subject to a constant stream of harassment, abuse and denigration.
That's not much of a prediction, Dawg. It's more like a guarantee.
How can one person be that much of a disingenuous hack?
"It's a shame that these people cannot handle rational debate. A shame, but unsurprising."
Coming from Patrick? The guy who is the very antithesis of rational debate?? Just look at any comment thread in which he showed up--did any of his commetls look like he was interested in this 'rational debate'?? ROTFL!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
And then to say " progressive bloggers, in Day's edict, are now to choose between rational debate or living by Day's command."--Patrick conflates his own ego with 'the whole of the internet' (again).
As if Patrick is the epitome of rational debate--the guy who makes sock puppet accounts (as me) in order to post racist comments... the guy who never backs up any of his idiocy... the guy who keeps lying about what actually transpired b/w cc and RE... the guy who, when finally faced with overwhelming evidence contrary to his stated beliefs (traingles, no deficits, we vote for PM's...) says those were 'hollow victories' and offers no mea culpa--and then he has the audacity to bitch that we're not engaging him in rational debate.
There's no such thing as 'rational debate' with Patrick--especially in the realm of ideological/political differences.
The bitch of it is, he's not even looking for debate--he's looking for sycophants like mahmood and mariaS--those that'll keep on saying 'good post!' with no discerning capabilities at all.
And he'll flood everyone elses comment sections with his *yawn*'s and LOL's and ROTFL's and think he's all that and a bag of cheetos.
And he'll bitch about his banning, say it's the 'end of rational debate' and not even think about the hypocrisy of "Also, all comments made by Kevron are deleted without being read"
I've nuked Patrick as well; not because of your ultimatum, CC, but because he showed up at my place, and after one surprisingly sane comment, started falling back into form. I have better things to do then waste my time on him.
on a related note: CK, if you're looking for a way to ban a username or IP on Wordpress, there are several "Ban" plugins you can get. I prefer the "Bannage" plugin myself; just do a search for it on the plugins part of the Wordpress dashobard, and you'll find it soon enough.
Scott:
While a number of Proggy-type bloggers have given Patrick the heave-ho, I doubt any of them did it solely based on my new policy.
I think that, like you, they had finally had enough of his dishonesty, misrepresentation and goalpost shifting, and my policy was that last little nudge that did it for them.
But, hey, whatever works. Now Patrick can spend more time with mahmood/Neo and Maria. Maybe they'll have a threesome. I see a tragically malformed baby in their future.
Neo/Mahmood and the Dodo are at this point his only regular commenters. A classic folie à trois.
Patsy enjoys an Alexa ranking of nearly 4 million. Try for five, Patsy!
Thanks Dr Dawg, Now I'm going to have nightmares for the rest of the week! Folie a 3: Yechh!!
Another thing to think about: i've never seen Patsy's blog in the Stephen Taylor collection of wankers alongside Jabba the Roy, Kate, Hunter and the other lost deranged souls.
Just sayin' if Patsy is even too sick for Stephen's house of wankers; you know he aint' well.
Post a Comment