Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Dear stupid Liberals and NDP: Let me make a suggestion.
When Parliament finally reconvenes and one of you useless twits gets the chance to address the House, let me suggest an opening statement.
Given that the Stephen Harper Drooling Theocrat Party of Canada justified that latest prorogation because they needed all that time to prep for ... well, whatever the hell it is they claimed they needed the time for, it behooves to you have, ready to go, a detailed and comprehensive list of what all those Conservative MPs were doing on their prorogation vacation. That is, a point-by-point list of the name of a Con MP, and what days he or she was on vacation or hanging out at the Olympics and clearly not working on the budget or whatever. And stand up and read that list into the official record.
Here, let me help you get started. Do you think you disorganized dingbats can handle that?
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Sigh. I believe the Liberals are going with: "Prorogation if necessary, but not necessarily prorogation".
A more accurate Liberal slogan... They shit their pants, so we're squeezing one off too.
The opposition really does appear to be whipped. I'd be building the case for an election right now.
I'd be building the case for an election right now.
Looks like they're going with "let Steve be Steve". It's working so far.
It has to work. The Liberals will only defeat Harper on an anti-New-Conservative vote. Which, thanks to Harper's continued arrogance, is quite possible. I would suggest that all Liberal backroom boys be fired, however, and the money diverted to Liberal makeovers so that they don't look like the same old Liberals Canadians still can't stand.
Please take your infant-sodomizing fantasies elsewhere.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Uh oh ... Patrick's in one of his moods again. I'm guessing the small animals in his neighbourhood are in sudden danger.
Patrick leaves fair informed comments. Why delete them!!!!
Because fuck off, Wayne. Seriously. And that's the last comment you're getting here.
My blog, my rules. Isn't that the way it works?
"Douchebag deflectors to maximum, Mr. Sulu!"
"Aye aye, sir!"
*Sigh*. Obsess much, Patrick? Seriously.
JJ's right, Patrick -- "spiraling into some kind of psychotic episode" describes you nicely.
I'm assuming you've added JJ to your list of "People Who Think Patrick Ross is a Deranged Lunatic." That list is getting some kind of lengthy, isn't it?
And, no, Patrick, I *don't* want to hear any more of your infant-buggering fantasies. Just so you know.
Wayne, PR is capable of fair informed comment (even though wrong most of the time in my view), which is why it is so disheartening to see the kind of bullshit he regularly dumps here. Though nobody reads his blog, some of his posts look reasonably presented and some contain insight. Then he switches to Baird mode, but does it with far less style (and that is not complimenting Baird). Such a waste.
Lately, he has taken to sneering at CC's statement that CC won't link anywhere (other than BTs of course) that allow PR's comments. So now PR is on a campaign to drop comments in various progressive blogs, then titter with delight if said comments are not deleted. Somehow this is a great victory and he crows about it in yet another Baird style post on his blog. For this effort, to ensure his words are not deleted, he greatly reduces the bullshit and has made the effort to make comments that do not deserve deletion on their face.
This is in contrast to his usual M.O., which is to provide somewhat reasonable comment, then once engaged, he gets out his bootleg copy of the "CPC Caucus Guide To Disrupting Committees and Other Parliamentary Business" and follows its ideas to derail whatever discussion is going on in order to make the thread about himself and his self referencing blog links. In the current "I didn't get deleted therefore CC is a loser" campaign he is doing a fair job of not following his usual method, and has attempted to stick to providing acceptable comment without the follow on crap.
So in other words, CC has convincingly proven that PR is capable of a higher standard of comment. Therefore, PR's being an asshole is a conscious choice, not a byproduct of being stupid.
And that, in my view, is why CC no longer has any patience for PR here. I agree with him on this.
It's more infantile than you think. When I announced my new policy and Ross read about it, he immediately wrote a post crowing that a number of well-known progressive bloggers were still accepting his comments. He didn't bother mentioning that most of those bloggers weren't even aware of my new policy so his crowing was utterly meaningless.
Now that my position is getting wider coverage, Patrick is having his commenting privileges yanked at more and more blogs, and it's not just because of my "ultimatum."
I've heard from a number of these people that they were already at the very edge of their patience with Twatsy, and my new policy was just that tiny additional nudge that decided it for them.
No one's canning Twatsy's ass because of any pressure from me. They're canning Twatsy's ass because they finally realize what kind of creepy, psychotic loser he is.
What's that, Patrick? You'd like to track down all the people who banned you and teach them a lesson they'll never forget? You're starting to creep me out, Patrick.
What's that, Patrick? You're a pathological obsessive currently spiraling down into a psychotic meltdown? OK, I'll give you that.
At least we agree on something.
M.P. Hobacks itinerary when he was beig accused of neglect.
Nice try, sock puppet. There is no accusation of neglect. The accusation is of hypocrisy. Vacationing in California while claiming (on the phone from there) that he is working for his constituents at the same time.
Uh oh ... Twatsy's back with a new identity. Nice try, "bubba.
What's that, Patrick? So many of Canada's progressive bloggers have banned your sorry, lying ass from their comments section that you've given up even trying to keep track?
Colour me unsurprised.
What's that, Patrick? JJ is such a useless trollop that that's no big loss and you don't give a crap?
Man, that's harsh.
OK, Patrick, we get it -- you and four-year-olds. Gotcha. Don't need to tell us twice. Seriously.
Patrick, I'm surprised. You guys are always giving us shit for using the C-word. Guess that's history, eh?
Post a Comment