Shorter Richard Evans: "Civility? It's whatever the fuck I say it is."
I hope you're paying attention, Paladiea. There'll be a quiz after this is all over.
I LIKE THIS PART of Richard's rant:
As far as the debate goes, It'll be civil enough. I plan on using it as another example of how the left can't assert/maintain an opinion without resorting to ad homs, emotional rhetoric, mud slinging and misdirection.
Yeah, Richard, you be sure to show us angry, unhinged, deranged moonbats how it's done. This is going to be such fun.
P.S. By the way, Paladiea, if a bunch of us leftists throw an impromptu intervention on your behalf, it's only because we love you.
22 comments:
I don't understand boycotting Olaf over Richard Evans, I understand why as it has been stated over and over.
People are still going to read Richard, people are still going to read Olaf.
Makes for great comedy all around, but in the end what is the point?
Pot, meet kettle. I'm willing to step into this new arena of ideas and play by the rules as outlined.
Far more than you seem willing to do CC...
If you think something is pointless, then I can't think of anything even more pointless than bothering to comment on it.
Which is why I'm not even bothering with the "Great Canadian Debate," although I am thinking of trolling it mercilessly.
I'm really fucking tired of these time-wasting juveniles. Get the fuck off the computer and go read a book, you assholes. You're ruining the Internet for the rest of us.
Pot, meet kettle. I'm willing to step into this new arena of ideas and play by the rules as outlined.
Who taught this moron? He doesn't even know what "pot calling the kettle black" means. How does someone this mentally-challenged even manage to wipe his own bum?
Anyway, I hope all of this manages to distract him from his obsession with child-rape.
Who taught this moron? He doesn't even know what "pot calling the kettle black" means. How does someone this mentally-challenged even manage to wipe his own bum?
Pot meet kettle: Those who accuse me of being uncivil (thai-guy and CC) are themselves being uncivil.
I'm really fucking tired of these time-wasting juveniles. Get the fuck off the computer and go read a book, you assholes. You're ruining the Internet for the rest of us.
The same can be said of you thai-guy...
Oh, quiet, you brainless nimrod. Honestly, Evans's douchiness is on a scale that would humble Massengill.
It would even be half-way amusing if not for the obsessions with child-raping.
Seriously, would anyone sensible even allow their children to come withing 100 meters of Richard Evans?
I know you are, but what am I?
It would even be half-way amusing if not for the obsessions with child-raping.
Don't you mean to say that I'm obsessed with your potential child-raping? You are the one after all who finds it completely acceptable that a 40 year old man can legally have sex with a 14 year old boy...
Once again, Richard, you've worn out your welcome by doing nothing but spewing insults, so I'm going to ask you politely to leave, and let's see if you can do that in a civilized manner, or whether you feel the need to always have the last word.
And where on earth has he said that, Richard?
I'd like to see some proof for that.
Richard equates my lack of hysteria over the age of consent law with approval of age-innapropriate sexual relationships. It's the dodge the little liar is always pulling.
In any case, Conservatives wail about young offenders not being tried as adults and then turn around and get hysterial that they're having S-E-X. The incoherence never ends.
I'm sitting here listening to the live stream of Live earth from New York (Roger Waters and he is good). I stroll over to CC, where I've lurked for a long time (don't ask, I'm senile) and I see another episode in the Richard Evans saga - another reprehensible slur that is just this side of actionable.
Me, I'm not affiliated with any political party. Like most Canadians that I know, I'm fiscally conservative when it comes to the government spending, but I'm socially liberal when it comes to taking care of the Canadian populace.
Like most Canadians, I can not be categorized as "Liberal" or "Conservative" and I really resent this imported imperative to split the populace along these lines. This imported ideology does not allow for Canadian values. It is based on the Straussian school of thought and I am most concerned that gullible people are espousing the ideology and employing the tactics that have proved so useful in the formerly great nation, the usa. (May Petie McKay rot in an American think tank, along with his buddies Frum and Steyn)
I find it interesting that most of the silliness comes from folks who are, at best self styled pundits. Given that I've been long winded, I understand why CC is engaging these people - hang them by their own petard so to speak, however, Richard Evans has crossed the line. Regardless of his veiled comments, his intent vis a vis TiGuy (in Evanspeak ThaiGuy) is quite obvious. If he cannot honestly refute, he attacks with the most vile innuendos that he can summon. Perhaps TiGuy should consult a lawyer. I believe that he has a case. Something to think about, eh.
This sort of shit has to STOP, otherwise we will lose our country just as the US has lost itself.
"Get the fuck off the computer and go read a book, you assholes."...from his first comment
"Who taught this moron?"...from his second comment
"Oh, quiet, you brainless nimrod. Honestly, Evans's douchiness is on a scale that would humble Massengill.".....from his third comment
All the above were "spewed" by Ti-Guy and yet he is not asked to leave for contributing only insults here. For someone who goes to great lengths trying to explain that his actions are not censorship when he boots someone from his site, you sure don't seem concerned about applying your "rules" in an even manner.
Take some time to browse over the regular contributions of Ti-Guy and find even one example where he actually has anything remotely substantial to say. It appears you allow him in for comedic effect, as pitiable as that is.
If he cannot honestly refute, he attacks with the most vile innuendos that he can summon.
Water off my back, really. Evans doesn't know who I am, and it's killing him.
My bigger problem is related to something I mentionned on this blog and nowhere else, both my parents were sexually abused and both of them ended the cycle of abuse; I'm eternally grateful to them for that, and knowing first-hand what childhood sexual abuse really means and how it robbed them of their childhood really puts Evans's own obsessions and depravity into perspective.
If Richard Evans wants to insult me, he can go right ahead. But these continued allusions to child-rape are beyond the pale, and I think he should be stopped.
And, just because I'm writing this...Just what the fuck was Olaf thinking when he associated himself with Evans's cesspool?
All the above were "spewed" by Ti-Guy...
Oh, c'mon. I wasn't even trying when I "spewed* that.
Now go back to whatever complicated contraption you've been using to "pleasure yourself," Q.
....Won't someone please think of the Hoovers!!.
Added: Shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, mother-fucker and...tits.
The truth stings, doesn't it Ti-Guy?
What truth? That I can be express myself in an appallingly vulgar manner?
Sorry q(unt). That's not really a revelation for me.
Richard: ti-guy is "Thai-Guy? Is that meant to be an insult of some sort?
Is it part of civil discourse?
How is calling someone "thai" an insult? Is there something wrong with people from Thailand?
That's what I am asking Richard.
Maybe it's not an insult, just really, really stupid. And that would mean that Ti-Guy is not a pedophile, and Richard Evans is an idiot.
Gosh, that couldn't be true, could it?
Post a Comment