Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(3428)
-
▼
June
(325)
- It's all in who you know.
- It's not like you didn't see THAT coming.
- Yes, you may worship me now.
- GUEST POST: Matt Bin on "The Inconvenient Troops."
- And a fine job you did, General Hillier.
- And in other vacuous news ...
- You keep using that word "gomer" ... quite correct...
- It's funny until a cop shoots an unarmed man in co...
- And in other cognitively dissonant news ...
- The wicked bitch slap of reality.
- Self-obsess much, Kate?
- A Cheap Post Created As An Excuse To Swipe A Graphic
- Actions. Consequences. I'm sure you can figure o...
- Your daily Denyseitude.
- Sunday Funnies.
- Um …. ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww?
- Sunday Morning Rawk
- Making our point so much more eloquently than we c...
- The douchebaggery of Kathy Shaidle.
- Dear darlings:
- Brane Hurtz...
- Awwwwwwwwwww, isn’t that sweet?
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- When we use the word "consequences," we don't actu...
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
- Your overwhelming Denyseitude.
- You keep using that word "irony" ...
- Stephen Harper: Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
- Well, stop the fucking presses!
- Chicks with blogs.
- Can we just waterboard this little fucker and get ...
- Yes, Reid ... whatever you say, dear.
- Those who do not remember history ...
- Whoopsie.
- Yeah, about all that "public funding" whining you ...
- Dear Deynse:
- You keep using that phrase "ad hominem" ...
- I just pissed myself.
- So Long Sandy
- Dear Denyse: Feeling lonely yet?
- They seemed like good ideas 30 years ago.
- When wingnuts be wingnutty.
- Oh. Dear. God.
- More Andy Schlafly beatdown.
- Kicking S
- No reason. Just 'cuz.
- No snark required.
- Words fail me.
- Overwhelming stupid that needs no smackdown.
- ... but he promises to use his psychic powers only...
- A bit territorial there, aren't we, dear?
- Oh, baby ...
- Your daily Denyseitude.
- Don't be bringing that liberal compassion shit in ...
- Oh, fer Chrissake!
- Radio!
- Dear wankers: Please shut the fuck up.
- It's because they lie. All the time.
- It sounded so promising at the time, didn't it, Sa...
- Do you see a pattern ...
- Bishops Meddling In Policy
- I R Scary
- Your daily Denyseitude.
- Ewwwwwwwwwwww.
- No problem, I enjoy doing your research for you.
- And a new orifice appears.
- Holy fuck, Stephen, but you're a whiner.
- The Stephen Harper Party of Canada: Standing up f...
- I wonder …
- When really, really stupid airheads blog.
- John McCain wants terrorists to murder your children.
- Dumbassitude unlimited: The Richard Evans Chronic...
- There's no substitute for quality.
- The mote in one's eye, and all that.
- This is why engaging them is a waste of time.
- Neo's concern is overwhelming.
- Oh, noez! Libruls r terrorists!!! 11!11!!!!1!
- And in this morning's geek news ...
- Oh, fer Chrissake!
- Stupid people who are Denyse O'Leary.
- So many questions, so little time to make them up.
- IOKIYAD (It's OK if you're a douchebag).
- Oh, this is going to be good.
- And solitary? Sure, that works for me.
- Oh please, oh please, oh please …
- That’s no lady.
- It's funny until a wheelchair-bound paraplegic get...
- You're too kind. Really.
- Them's fightin' words, Lance.
- Just checking in, 10-4.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- SO not workplace safe.
- Oh, God, the overwhelming wingnuttery.
- Busy weekend coming up, so here's your homework as...
- Yeah, what he said.
- On the other hand, there were some GOOD times, too.
- Reality? Not interested, thanks.
- Yeah, about that "evidence" ...
- You go, Steve!
- And the great debate is on ...
-
▼
June
(325)
4 comments:
The Cons claims here seem somewhat specious and suspicious.
They're more worried about this one than they want us (and their base) to believe.
I would suggest, as usual, to head over to Macleans Blog Central and read Kady O'Malley on these 'breaking developments'.
Big Jim (he's a bulky guy) is talkin' as if he were a participant in that conversation, and he wasn't even there as a witness. How the hell would he know how long the conversation lasted?
From what we know of Harper, and his opinions about the press, can anyone imagine him staying still for ten minutes in front of a reporter with a microphone?
Moore is scrambling to get a prominent seat in Harper's cabinet, so he's coming up with all kinds of what-if scenarios to please his boss. He's, like, fetching the stick before Stevie throws it in the hopes of being favorably noticed...
LuLu, with all due respect, you got this just ever so slightly wrong.
It should read:
"Fuck off...a hundred and one times, you lawsuit-happy, public-opinion-denying, free-speech-quashing, vote-buying, micromanaging, ass-kissing, dictatorial, hypocritical, fuckwitted, Republican toady"
ahh, that's better.
Do you feel better now, Rev?
Post a Comment