You imply I'm a racist without any evidence to support it.Fuck you.Apologize now if you have any sense of decency.
Wow ... swing and a miss. Anyone want to explain to Jonathon the rampant hypocrisy I was attempting to demonstrate here?
By the way, for the terminally hard of thinking, let me give you a hint.Really, you shouldn't need any more help.
No hypocrisy here. Either you explain how you came to the conclusion that I am a racist and show proof, or apologize immediately.A further demonstration of goodwill would be to cross-post Dr. Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany's appeal.
Still waiting. I assume in the meantime your scanning through my website for the slightest shred of evidence that I'm a racist. Take all day if you like, but let me save you the time. It's not there.I advise you to do your homework on what the Canadian legal system says about defamation.
And I suggest you show where CC implied you're a racist.CC's point (for the obtuse) is that you wrote about someone in a foreign country in trouble with religious fanatics but not about your fellow Canadians stranded in foreign countries by your own government.CC didn't infer that you're a racist, just that you're hypocritically dumb.
I'm still utterly mystified by this Conservative fashion to accuse their adversaries of hypocrisy/cowardice/moral bankruptcy/whatever...for not solving problems overseas while ignoring the same problem at home where they are in a much better position to do something about it.Who does this work on? What type of intellect actually attempts this?Anyway, to molify the Connies...*ahem*...Nuke Egypt!There. Problem...solved!
"And I suggest you show where CC implied you're a racist."just because cc didn't say it doesn't mean it isn't true.KEvron
"Take all day if you like, but let me save you the time. It's not there."oh! the irony!KEvron
This has more to do with Terry Glavin's crap post than what l'il Jonathon wrote.
Hint #2.Jonathan, I understand your concern for this Egyptian fellow, but where's the sympathy for your fellow citizens who get stranded overseas without any method of getting home (especially when it's our government standing in the way)?wv: hackup (it's appropriate somehow)
And because he's a Speech Warrior, he's on "Comment Moderation". These people are so clueless! Can we buy them a clue?JN - Have you noticed that no one is interfering with you posting here? Or is that also beyond your comprehension also?
Let me get this straight. I didn't write a post on the Abdelrazik case, and because of that, you infer that I'm a racist.Well, fuck you, again, sir. Your fishing expedition failed. Omission of a blog post referring to a specific case is not proof of anything. I'm still waiting for that apology.PS: Interesting that you never bothered to ASK me about the Abdelrazik case BEFORE you smeared me. More proof that you're just being malicious and throwing accusations out in the hopes something will stick.
fuck off already, ya' self-described racist.KEvron
Tell you what, KEvron. I'll go away just as soon as Canadian Cynic apologizes. I didn't start this. CC smeared ME on HIS website. I don't have to take it lying down.All I'm asking is for CC to do the right thing. The longer he holds out, the worse it is for him.So KEvron, go fuck off, yourself.
no, YOU fuck off! lol!cc, you owe this racist an apology.KEvron
"you're just being malicious and throwing accusations out in the hopes something will stick."i lurv that part!KEvron
Someone doesn't realize that playing the same card over and over just means they are not playing with a full deck.
The longer he holds out, the worse it is for him.So, does this mean you're going to out CC?Oh, wait...Just a little humour there, Jonathan. Yeah, I actually have a pretty good idea where you're going with that. Hey, it's your money. Far be it for me to tell you how best to throw it away.
It's amusing that even after people explain to Jonathon what's going on here, he still fails utterly to understand it. How ... intriguing. I must investigate this intellectual affliction further.
Maybe he misread--you did have a blog post right above this one slamming Cincinnatus regarding his overt racism.Maybe Jo didn't see the dividing line between the two blog posts.Maybe he didn't understand that those two blog posts were separate.Or just maybe Jo is so singlemindedly stuck on his idea that he can't discern the difference, or wants to--even when it's explained to him.Oh wait, that's true for most bt's.I think what we have here is a Patrick wannabe.
Post a Comment