Thursday, February 28, 2008

NAMBLA-Dick, and the CC reader challenge.


Oh, dear God ... just how self-destructively brain-damaged can one human being possibly be? As you might be aware, Calgary blogger and Stormfront-flavoured racist Richard Evans is still pushing this Canadian Cynic/pedophilia link, despite having not a shred of evidence to support any of it, but that doesn't stop him from publishing idiocy like, oh, this:

C.C. and Ti-Guy Neutered?

Not entirely, but their pool of potential sexual victims just shrunk considerably:

or defamatory rubbish like, oh, this:

The individual who calls himself "canadiancynic" seems to like the idea that 45 year old men should be legally allowed to have sex with 14 year old boys.

So here's what we're gonna do.

Dick is clearly too stupid to appreciate the dangers of a confrontational strategy of publishing his personal information online, then getting into it with an anonymous blogger and, yes, it's unfair to take it out on his kids. So here's a slightly different project I have in mind.

So far, we know (from totally public information available online) Dick's family situation, and even his home address and phone number (107 Beddington Cr NE, Calgary). So what are we going to do with that? I'm glad you asked.

Based on that information, it shouldn't be hard to figure out where his children go to school (again, most likely public information based on residence). And from that, it should be relatively easy to get a list of relevant local teachers and school board members (again, openly public information). And once that's in hand, it should be a piece of cake to make sure all of those responsible individuals are educated as to Dick's disturbing predilection for online child rape and promotion of child sex.

I'm thinking maybe a mass e-mailing to school board members. Perhaps notes to the teachers. Or, heck, why stop there? How about a mass delivery of eye-opening flyers in local mailboxes? Yup, I bet that would get someone's attention. ("Dear concerned parent: Let's talk about Richard Evans, shall we?")

Now we're all painfully aware of Dick's obsession with web sites and links promoting NAMBLA. But, technically speaking, does that really prove that Dick is into child sex? To which the proper response would be, of course, who cares!?!? Normally, I'd be terribly concerned about accuracy but, given that Dick seems willing to publish defamatory accusations that come only from his demented imagination, I figure I should get to play by the same rules.

So let's get started. I'd appreciate it if amused readers that live in Calgary can start tracking down any of the information I'm looking for above, and e-mail it to me. Do not post it in the comments section -- if you do, I'll delete it. E-mail only: Dick's kid's school(s), relevant contact people at those schools, school board members, trustees ... you get the idea. But make sure you understand the most important rule in all of this.

Every bit of this information must have been publicly available. It is absolutely unacceptable to do any hacking or illegal behaviour to learn any of this. Public records only, after which I will do my best to introduce Dick Evans to his local school officials. And his neighbours. And their kids.

Yes, I admit that picking on Dick's kids is unfair. So let's just go back to picking on Dick. And his racism. And his pedophilia. Think of it as a public service. Because, here at CC HQ, we're just thinking of the kids. And protecting them from Dick.

So let's go -- the lines are open, and operators are standing by.

BY THE WAY, here's something I'm betting that mental drop case Richard never thought of. Richard has, on a number of occasions, offered a monetary reward for my identity and, at the same time, has challenged me to sue him if I think he's made defamatory statements.

Now, since I prefer to retain my anonymity, I haven't even considered anything resembling legal action, despite the fact that Richard has clearly defamed me. In short, it's only my continuing anonymity that's protecting Richard from legal action. And I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this, can't you?

That's right -- if, somehow, Richard does figure out who I am and posts that information (and subsequently blows my anonymity), he can be assured of being served with papers within a week. After all, if I have no anonymity left to protect, then, what the hell? And I can assure Richard that I've been collecting all of his accusations and threats all this time. Just as I can assure him that, as a result of that potential legal action, the phrases "Richard Evans" and "pedophilia" will be forever linked in the minds of Calgarians for years to come.

So go ahead, Dick, and keep trying to expose my identity. Because the instant you actually succeed, I guarantee I will turn your life (and those of your wife and kids) into pure shit. But, hey, don't take any good advice from me. Feel free to do the dumbest thing imaginable. Why break with tradition now?

SNICKER ... Once again, poor Dick is reduced to lying to his readership thusly (no, no link, that would just encourage him):

CC’s thinking that he’s going to get at [my kids] through their schools: ...

Um ... no, Dick, this whole proposal has nothing to do with getting at your kids, it has to do with holding you up to public ridicule and embarrassment for your disturbing obsession with child sex. Not surprisingly, though, Dick totally misrepresents what I've written here so he can still milk his mentally retarded readership for sympathy.

Nice try, Dick, but this isn't about your kids anymore. It's about you and your NAMBLA fixation. Deal with it.

OH, DEAR GOD, THE IRONY
. I really don't want to give Dick any extra traffic but, seriously, you have to read this from one of Dick's intellectually deranged co-bloggers:

I consider this noteworthy.

Isn’t there a law against stalking? Wouldn’t his open declaration that his goal is to harass your family, be enough to call the cops on?

That's right -- that's "Wonder Woman," seriously suggesting that Richard try to charge me with stalking and harassment.

You cannot make this stuff up.

32 comments:

KEvron said...

" Normally, I'd be terribly concerned about accuracy"

nothing inaccurate in directing people toward dickkk's redirect.

KEvron

Ti-Guy said...

Why did NAMBLA-Richard link me to a comment over at Red Tory's.

Oh, hang on...it's 3:30 in Calgary. He's into the Lysol now.

KEvron said...

"I admit that picking on Dick's kids is unfair."

when did you ever do that?

KEvron

Sir Isaac Brock said...

...it should be a piece of cake to make sure all of those responsible individuals are educated as to Dick's disturbing predilection for online child rape and promotion of child sex.

The problem is that this putrid cretin's neighbours may already be perfectly aware of how worthless he is.

They may not even care: remember, this is Calgary--Rob Anders country. Your plan assumes that these people have a healthy sense of outrage: Nelson Mandela seems to disgust them, but closet pedophiles may not.

I fear that enlisting their help against Evans might be the equivalent of having asked Goering to scold Goebbels for using his Ministry of Propaganda to spread propaganda.

Richard said...

BY THE WAY, here's something I'm betting that mental drop case Richard never thought of. Richard has, on a number of occasions, offered a monetary reward for my identity and, at the same time, has challenged me to sue him if I think he's made defamatory statements.

Now, since I prefer to retain my anonymity, I haven't even considered anything resembling legal action, despite the fact that Richard has clearly defamed me. In short, it's only my continuing anonymity that's protecting Richard from legal action. And I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this, can't you?


I'm counting on it...

Ti-Guy said...

The problem is that this putrid cretin's neighbours may already be perfectly aware of how worthless he is.

Maybe someone needs to ask the residents of 105 and 109 Beddington Cres. NE, Calgary?

burpster said...

Once south of Red Deer, Alberta your headin' straight into Archie Bunkerville territory.

liberal supporter said...

All this NAMBLA stuff. I think there's been a typo.

Richard must really be all about NAMMLA, right? I mean, CC is over 18, right? And Richard is definitely displaying all the signs of having the biggest man crush I have ever witnessed.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

No wonder he wants contact information so badly. If only he could explain, maybe CC would have a change of heart.

But I think that slowly, Richard is sadly realizing that CC is just not that into him. All that effort, buying domains, setting up love sites, teasing with mean redirects, and not only is he not getting many clicks to harvest IP numbers, he only gets scorn from the apple of his eye.

Pity the Richard. Poor guy. Sometimes being in love sucks.

Richard said...

That's right CC, you just go ahead and keep snickering...

liberal supporter said...

Poor Richsrd. I'm sure there's someone out there who will appreciate you. Don't give up on love!

E in MD said...



That's right CC, you just go ahead and keep snickering...

By Blogger Richard, at 8:31 PM


Ooo... yeah CC keep snickering... or he'll make some more ominous pseudo-threats in your direction.

Red Tory said...

Once south of Red Deer, Alberta your headin' straight into Archie Bunkerville territory.

Ridiculous. I lived in Calgary for several years. In many respects it was a great place and surprisingly "progressive" in a lot of ways.

Zorpheous said...

It seems Dicky boy is also deleting comments from his blog. I seem to remember reading one of Red's comments over there and it seems to missing now.

Yuppers, let freedom Reign.

I'm serious considering out CC,

Ok, that's it Canadian Cynic real name is,.....
























Stephen Harper

Honest, I drink with him.

Richard said...

em to remember reading one of Red's comments over there and it seems to missing now.

Yuppers, let freedom Reign.


Was messing with the spam filter earlier on. Could have gotten lost then...

liberal supporter said...

How many IP's have you collected today, Richard?

Do you get a discount from your hit man?

Zorpheous said...

And the other comment that is missing as well,... let me guess the dog ate it, LOL

Now where's my money Dicky, I've given you CC true ID

Cherniak_WTF said...

I think that some are being too nice to dikkk.

This is a fuckwad who routinely registers domains with the intent to stress and defame.

As for his kids and family, let’s not forget that he decided to use the names of his wife and kids in his political campaign.
He could have easily said that he's married with children and left it at that. But no, he did not. He used them as props and tools.




All this is public knowledge because dikk is the one who placed it.
No one said anything about going after his kids, but one has to wonder about his sanity and the safety of those kids....

Like most repressed sextards, dikkk seems overly sensitive and fascinated by man-boy acts.... Maybe he's trying to communicate something here... do you visit men’s rooms in the hope of swallowing a little baby gravy there dikkk? Just curious...

HT said...

I've been reading you (lurking) for a few years, and while I often agree with you, there have been times when I have not - my initial reaction at your first post today was one of those times.
In the past, I've followed this contretemps with Mr. Evans and was concerned, because I felt Mr Evans is not the most stable individual, however I never went to his site for a variety of reasons. Tonight, I broke down. I went to his site. I read. I can only surmise that Mr. Evans is suffering from an illness that affects his judgement, nay his sanity, because I have never read such actionable drivel in my life, and I'm close to the seniors discount at Shoppers. I'm still concerned, because anyone who spouts that kind of vitriol is suspect and could be capable of violence.
Anyway, I want to apologize for my initial thoughts. After visiting that cesspool, I can understand your frustration, anger and determination to stop this nonsense. Just take care. He is not stable.

Kyle Lahnakoski said...

CC, I love ya, but you are crossed the line. Using children, or their bonds with their parents, is very serious and extra care should be taken with your prose. I only worry that your statements may induce action that is more harmful to Dick’s children than to Dick himself. I plead that you clarify your post that others take action with no malice toward Mr. Evans, but only out of concern for his children.

I am not saying you are wrong, my only issue is with the emphasising the use of Mr. Evans’s children to attack Mr. Evans. Mr. Evans may very well have problems that put his children at risk, and the proper authorities should be contacted in those cases. I do not read his blog, nor do I know anything about him, so I can not say one way or another.

Contacting school officials is not the most direct method of voicing your concern. If Alberta is like Ontario, then the Alberta Children’s Services should be contacted directly.

Red Tory said...

With all due respect, I wish that you folks would dismissively consign Mr. Evans and his loathsome crew of malefactors to the oblivion they so richly deserve. They’re nothing more than a collection of unhinged nitwits, gutless prevaricators and moral degenerates. All of this talk about NAMBLA and speculation about the aberrant sexual predilections of the site owner are tawdry and distasteful. While I can certainly appreciate your immense frustration at being victimized by the malicious, defamatory efforts that he laughably purports advance the cause of “freedom” or whatever, having to read all this execrable trash talking is tiresome in the extreme. Enough already. Richard Evans isn’t worth the effort… He’s a pathetic twat and a congenital liar. The sooner you move on from this abysmal, utterly pointless line of discussion, the better. My two cents…

liberal supporter said...

Richard who?

Sir Isaac Brock said...

One may safely take it as axiomatic that, when a thread has managed to feed such a keen appetite for anti-Con invective as Red Tory's to exhausted satiety, it has truly flogged the horse's corpse into a heap of bloody, viscous pulp. Not that this will stop anybody, of course.

the rev. said...

Awww come on CC, I mean, what would you even do with a house in Calgary once the lawsuit was over?

Southern Quebec said...

If Dick is so obsessed with NAMBLA, why not let the people over at NAMBLA know about it? I am sure they would like to know about someone who redirects people to their site.

Ti-Guy said...

Wonder Woman is now on the case? Well, what with her lasso of truth, mammaries of morality and vulva of virtue, there's no way you can withstand the challenge of someone so concerned about children and family values.

Niles said...

Given the eye-rolling I encountered when Mr. Evans' name came up during the city election in our riding...I'd say people around here are aware of him enough to be glad the socialist lefty Hawkesworth is still our alder-rep.

I'd have to agree with Red on the matter of Evans though. Shun his ass. He doesn't deserve you, no matter how frothy he gets. The last thing he needs is some faux excuse of you going after his kids.

I'd be interested to hear about any prelim legal/criminal opinions you might gather regarding his 'print' accusations/hunt against you. You can't be the only internet op-ed columnist with such troubles. Is civil law the only recourse? Or is this field so new there aren't legal remedies in place? Can anything be done when you are anonymous to the public? Or does it /have/ to wait until your legal ID becomes publically known?

Marky Mark said...

I don't think you can libel or defame someone who is anonymous or uses a nom de plume (unless his/her identity is known).

Dr. Dawg posted a link at fluid-mind where the blogger there is attacking him and others:

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/CriminalLaw/tabid/340/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/95/Canadas-Criminal-Law-Stalking.aspx

KEvron said...

"I don't think you can libel or defame someone who is anonymous or uses a nom de plume"

no, you can't.

KEvron

liberal supporter said...

But if the "nom de plume" is a Blogger identity, and a real world person is later conclusively linked to that identity, do all statements made about the nom de plume become actionable?

KEvron said...

i rather doubt it, ls. hard to prove negligence.

KEvron

frank said...

I'd like to see the reactions from the people receiving "mass e-mails" from weirdos with names like canadiancynic,lulu,ti-guy,kevron,e from md,etc.,etc.,etc., with outlandish accusations of God only knows. Yeah they'll take you fucking leftard wingnuts seriously FOR SURE!!! Please,please,please follow through with your grand plan as it will be sooooo much fun to watch and laugh at you freaks. Is it impolite to point and laugh?

liberal supporter said...

Yes, frank, we know about your mass email plan. Just like Evan's fake domains, your faked mass emails can and will be traced.

Glad to see you finally admitting you can't win through persuasive argument, and are now resorting to intimidation.

Won't work, chum.