Friday, June 06, 2008

How dare you!


Using a confessional for heterosexual sex. Why, the nerve!
Posted by at

7 comments:

The Seer said...

I am offended by this link and this post.

I thot we had established in 1998, or shortly thereafter, that so-called "oral sex" does not qualify as "having sex" even if done in a sacred place, such as the oval office. Apparently some of us have not gotten the message.

2:08 PM
Red Tory said...

Maybe I'm a prude, but that's in very poor taste and needlessly offensive.

2:29 PM
Chimera said...

Quid pro quo? Keep the church out of their sex lives and they'll keep their sex lives out of the church?

2:45 PM
Red Tory said...

Yes, yes... I get it. However, my residual sense of "propriety" recoils at this.

4:16 PM
Anonymous said...

Hmmmm... Slight fantasy thing going on there. Add in a red head or two and bang!...

Damn, I guess I am burning in hell.

(what, you didn't think I was religious did you?)

I'm ith the poster above. If the church did a better job of staying out of our bedrooms, I would be more prone to take offense. But sense they don't, let them gnash their teeth.

(Aren't confessionals unique to Catholics? I was raised one, and I honestly do not know.)

4:17 PM
Red Tory said...

High Anglican is essentially the same as Catholic in all superficial respects, so yes, we have confessionals. But this isn't an issue of religion. It's more a matter of taste, manners and civility.

5:53 PM
KEvron said...

heh. "bad taste"! seriously, though, pretty reprehensible behavior.

"If the church did a better job of staying out of our bedrooms"

i've never once noticed any member (!) of any church in my bedroom. tit for tat doesn't apply here.

KEvron

5:54 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)