Sunday, November 21, 2021

JUXTAPOSE!

Rebel News' "Chief Reporter" and crippling embarrassment to her children Sheila Gunn Reid goes on and on and on and on and on and on and annoyingly, boringly, tediously on about a guy who once simply knocked her camera out of his face:




The same Sheila Gunn Reid will now celebrate a 17-year-old white nationalist killing two people with a military assault rifle:




Posted by at

7 comments:

thwap said...

Rittenhouse is a racist scumbag from a racist, scumbag family. He put himself in danger. And, since his victims are dead, we really don't know the circumstances that led to racisthouse killing them.

It was probably a given, from the letter of the law, that racisthouse was going to be found "not guilty." But all the people celebrating this inbred doofus are on the wrong side of morality. Vile, foul, monsters.

11:15 AM
CC said...

Sheila Gunn Reid is an amoral cretin with no principles beyond whatever gets her a paycheque. If Kyle Rittenhouse had been black, she would be the first one shrieking for the death penalty. She is, quite simply, a valueless human being.

1:40 PM
John S. said...

There is zero evidence Kyle was a white nationalist and no he didn't shoot black people despite what some media reported and continue to claim.

All 3 were white and convicted felons.
Rosenbaum was convictedd of raping 5 children. He targeted single mothers.
Grosskreutz claimed to be a medic but was carrying a Glock and admitted
to pointing it at Kyle a second before he was shot in the arm.
He was photographed holding the gun because the damage to the arm
prevented him from dropping it.

Maybe watch a little more then CNN and MSNBC. Echo chambers are bad.



3:43 AM
John S. said...

@thwap

Actually it all caught on camera. including drone and helicopter footage with FLIR.
There is ZERO evidence Kyle was racist and the 3 people he shot were WHITE.

Rosenbaum was a convicted pedophile who raped 5 children.
The guy shot in the arm was carrying an illegal glock because was a convicted felon. He beat women and was convicted of robbery and home invasions. He addmitted to aiming at Kyle.

The guy shot in the chest was also a felon.


Try watching more then CNN and MSNBC.


3:49 AM
CC said...

John S.: Feel free to online search for "Kyle Rittenhouse white power" for the image of him flashing the well-recoginzed "white power" hand signal at a bar.

Thanks for stopping by.

5:28 AM
Anonymous said...

Not really sure what John's point is (unless he's arguing for a restoration of anarchic vigilantism, which is problematic given that the killer was presumably unacquainted with the criminal records of the people he shot.)

Having said that, I think the jury reached the right verdict. Much as it pains me to see this smug, puffed-up little Trumpkin acquitted and now canonized as a secular saint by the right, criminal trials are not referendums on public opinion or social justice; they're about testing a specific event through a specific set of legal criteria. In this case, the prosecution, in my opinion, failed to proved the charges "beyond the shadow of a doubt", and the acquittal was correct. It may not have been "justice", but it was the law.

1:59 PM
MgS said...

@John S.: Last I checked, having prior criminal convictions doesn't make shooting them less of a murder. I doubt very much that Rittenhouse had a clue who he was shooting at unless he had implants that were connected to the police and court databases a la Terminator.

... further, I'd say driving (or being driven) across state lines to "attend" a violent protest, where you were clearly armed in the first place, is a pretty good indication of forming intent.

Parts of the same videos you cite also show Rittenhouse waving his gun around like an idiot, making him an immediate danger to anyone near him.

So, who was the actual danger to whom?

3:30 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)