Monday, November 22, 2021

I'm just spitballing here ...

Regarding Sheila Gunn Reid's insistence that multiple killer Kyle Rittenhouse "had to protect himself" ...




Here's a wild and crazy idea -- perhaps if Rittenhouse hadn't driven across state lines with an illegal assault rifle and sauntered fully-armed into the middle of a protest provocatively waving around his AR-15, he wouldn't have needed protecting.

It's just a thought.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Scenario: an angry young black man hears that a Proud Boys-sponsored Pro-Trump rally is going to occur. Given the damage wrought in Washington and elsewhere by alt right demonstrators, he grabs a rifle and heads to the Proud Boys rally, where he confronts the demonstrators, kills two, and wounds one. He claims self defense.

How quickly does Sheila launch a funding appeal on his behalf?

CC said...

A "Muslim" example would have worked just as well.