Are we taking any bets on how this ends?
BONUS TRACK: Patrick Ross, who has been described by various courts as "malicious":
"reprehensible":
and "baseless and scandalous":
above passes judgment on someone else's behaviour.
Sure, why not?
P.S. If you thought Patrick was being a total buffoon in the previous post, you might want to pop by tomorrow where it gets so much stupider.
1 comment:
Of course, there's always the old saw about whether one can damage someone's reputation when they've already done so much damage to it through their own actions.
Post a Comment