Thursday, May 29, 2008

Poor Patsy Pantload.


The mindless, factually-incorrect fuming vs. the oh-so-delicious smackdown. Guess who won?

Just a friendly piece of advice ... never, ever, NEVER bring a knife to a gun fight, you corpulent, mullet-sporting fuckwit. Fern’s foot must be awfully sore.
Posted by at

11 comments:

CC said...

There's not much point bringing logic or evidence to a discussion with Twatrick. After all, this is the dingbat who, to this day, is absolutely adamant that triangles have eight sides.

Go ahead -- try to have an intelligent discussion with that kind of retarditude.

7:19 AM
Red Tory said...

Don't feed the troll. ;)

7:47 AM
LuLu said...

I try not to, Red ... really I do. But this was too hilarious to pass up.

7:49 AM
CC said...

Red might have a point -- given that Patrick has publicly called for the murder of abortion providers, maybe we shouldn't be taunting him quite so much. Just to play it safe.

7:54 AM
Red Tory said...

Feh, the worst Patsy could do is bore someone to death.

8:00 AM
¢rÄbG®äŠŠ said...

...given that Patrick has publicly called for the murder of abortion providers, maybe we shouldn't be taunting him quite so much.

Good point.

It did surprise me when he finally came out and stated his position.

6:16 PM
liberal supporter said...

What was his position?

6:56 PM
Patrick Ross said...

given that Patrick has publicly called for the murder of abortion providers, maybe we shouldn't be taunting him quite so much.

That's a libelous comment, CC. I'd retract it if I were you.

But personally, I kind of hope you don't.

2:30 AM
CC said...

I'm sorry, Twatsy ... I could have sworn you took that position once. Then again, it might just have been you cornholing the English language beyond any recognition like you normally do.

We can settle this quickly enough, Twats. Just leave a comment here in which you unequivocally and categorically condemn the murder of abortion providers, and I'll be delighted to correct the record. After all, here at CC HQ, we're all about the accuracy.

And by the way, Twats, here's something to think about. If I invite you to clarify your position, and you refuse and pull that evasive, "I already answered that question" shit from before, I feel fairly safe in concluding that any libel suit against me will have about as much chance as finding a coherent post on that toxic waste dump of a blog of yours.

So there you go, Twats. Clarify the situation here, and we're good, and we'll move on. Be the typical weasel that you normally are, and I'll ignore you like the utter prat you are.

Now give Mommy back the keyboard. That's a good boy.

P.S. Say hi to your commenter for me.

5:56 AM
¢rÄbG®äŠŠ said...

LS: "What was his position?"

Sorry, I was just tossing a tablespoon of fuel on the fire - I don't know that he has stated his position, but I certainly don't care. It's not as though he'd suddenly have claim to some sort of credibility.

He does seems to enjoy saying in a sing-song voice (in the manner of little sisters everywhere):

I have a secret,
And I'm not telling...

This does not keep me in suspense, Patrick.

7:09 AM
liberal supporter said...

You usually hear "I already answered that" in face to face type public meetings where there is limited time and you are trying to keep things moving. Typically it is a response to someone who arrived late, or possibly to someone who is being disruptive.

When the time taken to dissemble and then attack the questioner is greater than the time to simply provide an answer, then you can presume the person being questioned in not acting in good faith.

Should I bother asking again? Fourteenth time lucky and all that?

12:25 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)