Let's say some guy is on his way from WallMart carrying a brand new big screen plasma TV. As he walks to his car, a criminal approaches him and hits him on his arm with a metal rod, breaking the bone. Of course, there's no way the guy can hold a heavy TV set with his arm broken, so he drops the box, and the TV gets smashed. What crimes should the assailant be charged with in this case? Would it be sufficient to charge the guy only with causing bodily harm or should he be charged with destruction of property as well?
Oy fucking vey. When JJ calls her on that steaming load she swirls up a big twist in the comments.
Okay, what if the object in question was a cage with a parrot in it?
If the parrot is injured, isn't he a victim, too?
SU*****
She goes on to try and wrench some equivalence out of the dust and fly crap that might justify Bill C-484, dedicated to the kicking of the arse of abortion. But in all threads there is a winner and over in Crazy Sue's house of plonk, our own beloved KEvron takes the prize.
tell you what: should your wallmart(sic) guy ever manage get that big screen tv up into his vagina, i'll give your analogy a little more respect....
KEvron
10 comments:
Is the parrot a Norwegian blue? Beautiful plumage. Not dead, it's only pining for the fjords.
But, seriously. Talk about utterly, batshit deranged.
KEvron: I salute you, sir. That provided me a supreme laugh out loud moment.
My computer is grateful dinner wasn't ready yet.
And frank frink gets bonus points for the first Monty Python reference.
Um... as long as PSA says it's okay for me to hand out bonus points on his post, that is! ;-)
Call me old-fashioned but I don't see "flatscreen tv" or "parrot in a cage" replacing oyster or fur pie any time soon.
This just goes from bad to worse. I really never thought these people were so deranged, although, truth be told, whenever I had these discussions in person, they'd all get these glazed looks on their faces and start screaming...
...that should have been a clue, I suppose.
woot!
she took my wisecrack at face value, so i decided i'd play it straight with her, and try to explain to her how her analogy didn't work. she simply could have said "oh, i see now how my analogy failed, but i stand by my views", but her type just cannot admit any error.
i've thrown c-543 out there for her. it'll be interesting to see how she bats at that one. she'll probably just pack more horseshit into her ears....
KEvron
She might be able to get one of those cool new little OLED TVs with the flexible screens from Sony up there. Maybe she just needs to hone that analogy a bit…
Or should I say fine-tune it?
"Its metabolic processes are a matter of interest only to historians!"
Sheena's TV is pink.
Post a Comment