Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(3428)
-
▼
May
(249)
- No, Bob, you're giving him too much credit.
- lol
- Ah, the douchebaggery of it all.
- Just when you think they can't get any stupider ...
- Dumbassitude, Sandy Crux-style.
- From the department of "Don't waste any brain cells."
- If you’re looking for sympathy – part infinity + 1.
- um... Zoink!
- Culture!
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Dear Fern: Welcome to Rossholia.
- The mote in one's eye -- Stephen Harper edition.
- Instant Breakfast Dispenser
- I need a new word.
- But that's different!
- Being a conservative means perpetually making shit...
- Injustice
- Whoo hoo, we're back!
- Stockwell?
- Fuckin' Atrocity
- Canada! Cluster bombs! We're back and we rock! ...
- Heh.
- You won't look so stupid if you actually know things.
- Pardon my giggles …
- And Now, On The World Stage...
- Poor Patsy Pantload.
- If you look closely, you can notice the difference.
- Is it irresponsible to speculate wildly?
- The mote in one's eye.
- Stephen Harper: Good little Jew boy.
- The bigotry of low expectations ... for really stu...
- Dear Scott McClellan:
- Apparently, actual competence is overrated.
- Your daily "Crock o' the Matter" accomplishments.
- Dear Bell: You suck.
- The devil is in the details, you twit.
- Here's another "accomplishment" for you, Sandy.
- I got your “Accountability” right here, Big Daddy.
- Stephen Harper, you lying sack of crap.
- Nope, didn't think that one through.
- I’m outta here.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
- The Blogging Tories: Ten pounds of cognitive diss...
- Your daily crock of Crux.
- C-484 Protecting Unborn TVs
- Math
- Interestinger
- Holy crap!
- Ah, the optimism of the imbecilic.
- Want to play?
- CONTEST
- Dion's Court: All Fools, No Nobles
- Just so you know what genius looks like.
- Dear Stephane: It's time for you to go.
- Denyse O'Leary: The viral blogger.
- Your "liberal" media in action.
- That’s just icky.
- Sometimes, this job is too easy.
- Stephen Harper: "Accomplishments" and fuck-ups.
- It seemed like a good idea at the time.
- There's obsessive, and then there's ...
- Sunday Funnies.
- It's Sunday: Time to kill someone's kids.
- Smoosh
- Leave him alone, LuLu. I'm serious.
- Well ... that’s not very Christian.
- Is it just me ...
- Sandy would tell you, but then she'd have to kill ...
- Retardopedia redux.
- And in some alternate universe, Denyse O'Leary is ...
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Only the names have been changed to protect the te...
- Your irony du jour.
- Play time, boys and girls.
- The train wreck that is Hillary Clinton.
- Ew, ew, ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
- Oh my.
- The Peter Principle, taken to really creepy extremes.
- In Memoriam.
- Beer, beer, beer, beer ...
- Document the atrocities.
- You know it's biking season when ...
- Matt Bin and American war resisters.
- Sometimes, they're right by accident.
- It's still stupid ...
- To Boldly Cower...
- 'Cos
- Support the $#**&$^%#@# troops.
- Touché indeed.
- Frankerotica, small-calibre style.
- The embarrassment that is Dr. Roy.
- I guess that's what you call "proof."
- There are no words ...
- Beyond incoherent and thoroughly into delusional.
- And speaking of ANWR ...
- Simple answers to simple questions.
- I love the smell of whiny, snivelling, petulant fe...
- So, yeah, that's a reasonable reaction.
- The stupid! It burns!
- Ken Epp's Big Con
-
▼
May
(249)
16 comments:
jeeziz, what an idiot. just fish your little gun out and shoot blindly behind yourself. crack off a few rounds and everything will be better. alan rock and the liberals are responsible for rape because easily concealed guns aren't available. i love the bit about criminals invariably preferring big weapons with at least 18 rounds. gawd knows a criminal wouldn't have a use for an easily concealed weapon, no sir.
Damn Alan Rock! And to think the man managed to reach back through time thousnads of years! If only his mother had known, she would have skipped sex the night he was conceived.
Plus there's stuff like:
http://www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=25&category=Pistol (11 rounds - 10 clip, one in breach)
Or this http://www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=18&category=Pistol (13 rounds - 12 clip, one in breach)
Of course, there is this: http://www.handgunsmag.com/featured_handguns/master_121305/ but it's only 7 rounds (6 clip, one breach) but then again, it's basically a miniaturized 1911
Clearly bigger, but this seems likely to be concealable: http://www.px4storm.com/index.aspx?m=53&did=48
Better yet, the compacts here: http://www.berettausa.com/product/product_pistols_main.htm (the 84FS Cheetah has a " 13-round staggered magazine")...
If you check the subcompact and compact sections at www.glock.com, you'll find more that are relatively small but carry larger capacity mags (in fact many of Glocks compact pistols will take up to 15 round mags.. some up to 33..)
All of which is to say that I can find firearms that are within an inch or so of the gun he is so angry with Rock about that carry 10 or more rounds.
This is also assuming that one couldn't carry a full sized pistol in a manner that would escape casual observation.
I think this assumption is stupid.
Because I apparently like my brains to leak out my ears from teh stupid I went over there and left this comment:
"Cameron Campbell said...
So the New™ Government™ of™ Canada™ has been in charge for how long now?
These should be legal again any second right?
May 22, 2008 6:56 AM "
Frank, being the honest, intelligent guy that he is said:
"Hi Cameron,
So you don't think women should be able to legally defend themselves? I guess only strong, burly males deserve that right, eh? Good thinking on your part.
Frank Hilliard"
At which point I asked him to show me where I said that and then called him a, you know, liar.
Oddly that comment isn't up yet.
Hmm.. still no joy an hour later.. Conservatives, so ready to defend their views..
Frank and his like-minded crackpot commenters aren't interested in honest discussion. Their usual tactic is to invent something they imagine you said or that they think you would likely say and then knock the stuffing out of that ridiculous strawman. Complete douchebags.
Yeah, that guy is a complete moron and I never bother commenting to him. His fantasy scenario (which is rigorous logic in his world) has a rapist that is so stupid that he doesn't disable, or even notice, his victims ability reach for a weapon (bear spray, gun).
Nor does mesowest consider that the she is supplying her rapist with a free gun because he'll just take it from her.
He replied though.. give him credit for that.. I mean, with a question and he posted what I said about him being a liar etc...
Whoops, I'm meant to stop now, because apparently everyone can see what is going on via the comments...
whatever that means..
That was the funniest exchange I've read in some time, Cameron. Thanks.
Frank's just another dishonest coward who blocks comments and pulls the plug when he gets called out on his blatant lies.
Dear God, CC ... Have you checked out Frank's book on protecting yourself from home invasion? That man should be medicated and locked up if he honestly believes it will help anyone. My personal favourite is that he's catalogued it at Lulu under "Mystery & Crime": http://www.lulu.com/content/2369363
gordo, thank you...
I should point out that I made another comment, that he hasn't approved, questioning who had taught him firearm safety, what with the unaimed, behind the back shooting in urban areas..
Gordo — I wrote about his kooky home invasion book a while back. Turns out the chances of such an incident happening are like 1 in 250,000. Definitely something one should be terrified about. The man is a creepy old nut.
I don't have the stats on the change of stranger rape in the scenario that he lays out, but it's also statistically quite small.
Post a Comment