So, he lost the challenge, thinks the kids have been stiffed for the money, and wants to make it up to them. That's not so bad.But is he stepping up to the plate to do this? Of course not! Other people are supposed to do the actual donating so that he can strut around and crow about how he saved the little kids from mean old CC.Doesn't that just illustrate the right wing crackpot way of thinking so well? You, how they want to help the people of other countries, but want other people to do the actual fighting and dying so they can strut around and crow about how they saved the world.Typical.
It's called capitalism, boys.They teach you about it at schools that even you can get into.
You should offer some Twatrick-themed product of your own...does CaféPress do tubesocks?
ROTFLSadly, folks, no.They do thongs, but then I'd actually start to wonder about you feebs.
CC — You reneged on your solemn vow to ignore this miserable pissant, but I can’t say that I blame you, all considered. Truly, this must be some sort of a nadir for abysmal, catastrophic stupidity in the Canadian blogosphere… although having banged my head to no apparent avail against the Unambiguously Ambidextrous Wall of Idiocy for the last couple of days concerning the issue of homosexuality (which is “deviant”, “abnormal”, “aberrant” and as such can therefore be “logically and objectively” equated with paedophilia and child rape… and anyone arguing that such characterizations are offensive is “mentally diseased”… blah, blah, blah), all bets might be off in this regard. Still, Patsy’s little prank is an incredibly broke-ass little gesture, isn’t it? Yesterday, I suggested that you both should pony up the $250 to this charity in order to get that off the table in connection with this dispute and I’d reiterate that now. Plunk the money into that organization and post the receipt/confirmation. Neither one of you should be gambling in this manner in the first place, but let’s see you guys put your money where your mouths are.
Already working on that, Marty -- one T-shirt at a time.You know, Cynic, you've mistreated an AWFUL lot of people in your time. I wouldn't be surprised to see a LOT of these t-shirts out and about.And they'll all know about you reneging on your offer after losing your own challenge...Sad. Very sad.
So Twatrick, will you be donating whatever profits you make off the mearch to charity or are you going to follow the Conservative brand of economics where you get others do the work?I'd be surprise if you sold more than 2 T-Shirts or mugs...Neither one of you should be gambling in this manner in the first placeWhy not?
Patsy — I'd like to see some confirmation of that. I doubt that you will sell more than a couple. Please post the account summary so this can be verified. CC — Plunk down your money and be done with this obnoxious little pillock once and for all. Really. Seriously.
I just posted the link to http://canadiancynic.blogspot.com/2008/03/patsy-ross-hates-wanda-watkins-neener.html on his comments with his post about t-shirts..
But will Patsy Pantload post it?
You know, Cynic, you've mistreated an lot of AWFUL people in your time.Fixed.
And they'll all know about you reneging on your offer after losing your own challenge...No, they'll know you claim so and that it is not true.Bait and switch.
Ho ho ho, Marty, you have a lot to learn about capitalism.I have no obligation to share sales information with you. Unless, of course, you want to become a shareholder.Heh. Wanks.
I have no obligation to share sales information with you.So in other words, Patsy, you corpulent, mullet-sporting lackwit, you have no intention of actually proving that the money will go to charity. Nice. Colour me sooooo not shocked to find out what a dishonest prat you truly are.
Check out Captain Capitalist, now that he's got a CaféPress account.What's next for this enfant terrible? A lemonade stand? A paper route?...Mary Kay?
I have no obligation to share sales information with you. Unless, of course, you want to become a shareholder.Shorter Patsy: All ur munee belong to me.Patsy, don't you know it's not a good idea to leave a bathtub full of cooking methamphetamine unattended. Guess you should be running along. Pronto.(and I just bet you're listening to 'Dust In The Wind' as I type. OK, maybe not 'Dust In The Wind', maybe these guys or this guy?)
"Already working on that, Marty"oh! the irony!KEvron
Patsy — Ho ho ho, Marty, you have a lot to learn about capitalism.Sorry, but as a corpulent, toffee-nosed wanker pretending to study sociology, who’s never had a real job in his relatively short, bubbilicious life, you really don’t have the first fucking thing to tell me about “capitalism.”
You feebs will have the proof when I write the cheque.(Not that I expect you to understand this very simple concept.)
I won't be holding my breath. "Feebs"... I don't think I've heard that word since Grade 4.
Patsy, I think you mean when we see the cashed cheque. ps - You can write? With a sharp, pointy object?
t's called capitalism, boys.They teach you about it at schools that even you can get into.By Blogger Patrick Ross, at 6:28 PMLying through your teeth in order to make a buck at someone else's expense...Yeah that's capitalism alright.Wow... Patrick's actually RIGHT for once.
You feebs will have the proof when I write the cheque.Oh, God...I can't wait that long. My whole life will hang in the balance until I see proof of...*ding*...ooh..hotpocket's ready.
Oh, man... you are just too funny sometimes.
Ugh... and CC wonders why he was listed in my vile article.
Fuck off, Raphael. Don't you have some feminists to blame for the decline of Western civilization as a whole? Oh no wait, you've moved on to "aberrant" and "unnatural" homosexuals. Speaking of vile you misogynistic, homophobic asshole ...
I'm sorry, Raphael ... Patrick does something stupid, classless and infantile, and I'm the one who's "vile?"On what planet does that make any sense?
Right, lulu, because in the progressive world, homosexuals are the normal and ordinary sexual orientation.You remind me of the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. No arms and no legs, but not willing to accept he's different than anyone else.
"Right, lulu, because in the progressive world, homosexuals are the normal and ordinary sexual orientation."Yep. And, actually, in the real world too. Raph, there have been plenty of studies that show that homosexual behavior is a normal minority behavior in all mammals. It has a biological basis. Science is a wonderful thing, no?If you don't want to indulge in homosexual behaviour, don't. That two other guys might should really be no business of yours.
Teh Stoopid - growing exponentially by the minute.
"Ugh... and CC wonders why he was listed in my vile article."lol! i'm sure cc's devastated!lol!KEvron
Right, lulu, because in the progressive world, homosexuals are the normal and ordinary sexual orientation.I'm sorry - when did we decide you got to decide what was normal and what was abnormal? Oh I remember ... never. This may be far too much for your tiny, Blogging Tory brain to process, Raphael, but what happens between 2 consenting adults is no one's business but their own. So, while I'm sure you've heard this before, perhaps you could start fucking off? Right about now.
Notice the shift from "unnatural" to "abnormal" and "extraordinary". It's all a misunderstanding, he's simply arguing that homosexuality is the exception, like red hair, that's all.And he calls other people "dishonest"?
It's the same kind of word parsing that leads to "evolution is just a theory".
Post a Comment