Monday, March 24, 2008

Nice family you got there ...


... be a shame if anything happened to it, know what I'm sayin'?

When white supremacists first started congregating publicly in Calgary, it was they who hid their faces behind masks.

But since they started posting pictures of themselves on the Internet with guns and baseball bats -- and after two recent Molotov cocktail attacks in the city were tied to possible white supremacist activity -- it's the counter-protesters who have to hide their faces. One person who knows the danger of standing up against the neo-Nazis is Bonnie Collins.

She, her four children -- aged three to nine -- and her husband, Jason, were all home when their house was fire bombed on Feb. 12.

That moment was painfully relived Friday, when Bonnie -- as part of a counter-demonstration -- confronted the neo-Nazis, who asked her, "How's your house, Bonnie?" while standing behind a cordon of police officers on the front steps of city hall.

"Is it nice and toasty in there? How's Jason and the kids?"

I'm sure Canada's pro-life, pro-family, child-worshipping conservatives are besides themselves with outrage over this.

Or maybe not. It was just a guess.

(Wag of the tail to BigCityLib).

28 comments:

Patrick Ross said...

Yup. Nice family there, be a shame if something happened to them.

The absolute atrociousness of white supremacists aside, you really just don't think these things through, do you?

CC said...

Um ... no, Twatrick. Actually, I'm normally thinking so many steps ahead of you that you can't even begin to imagine where I'm going. As I will be happy to point out later today. Stay tuned.

the rev. paperboy said...

awww, isn't that cute? It thinks it has an idea! Careful with that thought Patty, it's in a dark, lonely place.

LuLu said...

The absolute atrociousness of white supremacists aside

That was incredibly easy for you, Patrick. Obviously you have a lot of experience just brushing shit like that under the carpet.

It's really quite sad that you feel the need to come over here and hijack every thread with your unending stupidity. I guess it's because you haven't got any commenters over at your place ... now why don't you do that fucking off thing like a good wanker, hmmm?

CC said...

Leave Twatrick alone, LuLu ... I'm guessing he's lonely and pops by here in the hope that the occasional reader follows his trail of slime back to his place.

Besides, I'll be dealing with Twatrick later. I'm sure you'll be amused.

Cameron Campbell said...

What is it with the right and equivalencies that aren't?

I thought the deal was that the lacked a moral center... or at least that's what helpful right-wing nuts have been telling me for years...

Patrick Ross said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CC said...

Fuck off, Twatrick. I'm getting really tired of you blogwhoring over here, trying to attract readers to that dreary, unread sinkhole of a blog of yours.

You want readers? Then go get them the old-fashioned way -- earn them. And stop leeching off of my popularity.

Fucking loser.

Patrick Ross said...

No. You're fed up of people pointing out the truth to your readers, and I'm starting to think you may actually be at risk of developing a conscience: clearly you can't take it any more.

Canadian Cynic published Richard Evans' home address and encouraged people to harass him and his family.

Canadian Cynic targeted the home life of a political opponent, just like the white supremacists discussed here.

Delete it all you want. I'm just going to keep on posting it.

You will not hide from the truth.

liberal supporter said...

No. You're fed up of people pointing out the truth to your readers, and I'm starting to think you may actually be at risk of developing a conscience: clearly you can't take it any more.
You are a deluded troll. You are not pointing out any truth.

Canadian Cynic published Richard Evans' home address
Repeating information published by Evans himself.

and encouraged people to harass him and his family.
I don't think so.

Canadian Cynic targeted the home life of a political opponent, just like the white supremacists discussed here.
Your conflation is breathtaking. It is surpassed only by your dishonesty.

Delete it all you want. I'm just going to keep on posting it.
Harassment is all know how to do.

You will not hide from the truth.
Nor shall you, LIAR.

LuLu said...

The truth? You can't handle the truth!

I'm sorry Patrick, you ignorant prat, the best movie scene/line post was Saturday and no, you weren't invited.

Please try again next Saturday when we will all be sure to point and laugh and not invite you again.

Patrick Ross said...

Then what, so ever should we make of this, ls:

"And the idea that someone at Calgary Social Services might want to check in on the well-being of Richard's kids, Courtney and Tyler, at 107 Beddington Cres. NE? I'd never come right out and recommend it but, hey, better safe than sorry, know what I mean?"

Canadian Cynic published the home address of Richard Evans and encouraged people to harass him and his family.

If you really want to pretend otherwise, ls, then you are a liar.

But then again, you know that, don't you? You're a liar. And you know it.

Canadian Cynic published Richard Evans' home address and encouraged people to harass his family. And you know it.

I don't need to hide from the truth, ls, Lulu -- unlike yourselves.

Frank Frink said...

Who's holding the other half of your wit Twatsy? Dr. Roy?

liberal supporter said...

Canadian Cynic published the home address of Richard Evans and encouraged people to harass him and his family.

Ensuring his children are safe, and publishing information that Evans himself made public, is not harassment.

Burning his house down, as the Neo Nazis you are defending do, would be harassment, and attempted murder.

Posting a bounty for private information is harassment.

And PR, you said you would stay away from RT's blog last July, yet you hang out there all the time. Therefore you are a LIAR.

And you know it.

Liar.

Patrick Ross said...

Hey, Frank, have you ever noticed how every time I stroll into one of these blogs and absolutely crush you nitwits, all you seem to have to offer is weak sniping?

Personally, I think of you like a kicked chihuahua: you know you're not going to do anything about it, but you want to keep on yipping nonetheless.

CC said...

Now, kids, let Twatrick have his fun. He's very shortly going to learn a painful lesson about the real world, so just let him rant. The more ranting, the better. You'll see what I mean within a day or so.

Patrick Ross said...

You know, I almost wouldn't have, but:

"Ensuring his children are safe, and publishing information that Evans himself made public, is not harassment."

...Is that what you really think?

ROTFL

You know, I knew you were one of the stupidest people in the Canadian blogosphere (second only to Frank Frink, as a matter of fact), but if you really believe that, then maybe I have to take it back: you aren't a liar. You're just incomprehensibly stupid.

liberal supporter said...

absolutely crush you nitwits,
Hahahahahaaha

all you seem to have to offer is weak sniping?
I would give you strong sniping if I was sitting in my chair and not rolling on the floor, laughing uncontrollably.

kicked chihuahua
You were doing so well too, for a troll. But now just wait till Catherine find out you hate dogs. You will be one of the doorknobs she sends back.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

I hope I am helping cc, to encourage PR to continue to fume and sputter.

liberal supporter said...

"Ensuring his children are safe, and publishing information that Evans himself made public, is not harassment."

...Is that what you really think?

What part of calling Social Services to check up on the loon's children do you not understand?

How do you equate that with firebombing houses, like the Neo Nazis you are defending do?

You know, I knew you were one of the stupidest people in the Canadian blogosphere (second only to Frank Frink, as a matter of fact), but if you really believe that, then maybe I have to take it back: you aren't a liar. You're just incomprehensibly stupid.

Yes, I do see you've lost the argument. Thank you for conceding that I am right.

You are a liar.

LuLu said...

Hey, Frank, have you ever noticed how every time I stroll into one of these blogs and absolutely crush you nitwits, all you seem to have to offer is weak sniping?

And there you have it, boys and girls, incontrovertible proof from Patsy himself that he suffers from a catastrophic disassociation from reality.

If he weren’t such a contemptible, tiresome fuckwit, he’d almost — almost — be worthy of pity. Now be a good little troll and run along Patsy; surely you must have some big time exclusive *cough* delusional *cough* interview to pimp or a potty-mouthed blogger to out?

Ooops - you're not very good at that either. My bad.

Frank Frink said...

Twatsy, I'll just keep on setting 'em up and you can just keep on stepping on the banana peels.

CC said...

By the way, as a single example of the kind of dishonesty that's going to cause Twatrick some grief down the road, examine this claim from an earlier comment:

"Canadian Cynic targeted the home life of a political opponent ...."

Assuming that Twatrick is referring to ... well, you know who, I believe it's self-evident that that claim is utterly bogus.

Given that I was never running for political office of any kind, it should be clear that no one could have been my "political opponent." The fact that someone else was running for office does not, in any way, make them my "political opponent." See how that works?

But it's that kind of sloppy dishonesty that we've come to expect from Twatrick. And it's just that sloppy dishonesty that I'm going to use to make his life just a little more awkward. Real soon now.

Pale said...

cc.....you are mean. Really. Oy. talk about a tease......Do we need popcorn? Or would the twizzlers be more appropriate?

LuLu said...

CC. Payoff. Gimmee.

Now.

KEvron said...

i smell self-loathing....

....ah, tatsie's been hanging around again.

KEvron

KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
CC said...

Well, now, isn't this intriguing? After Twatrick howls incessantly about what kind of liar I am, I supply an absolutely and utterly indisputable example of his dishonesty -- the one regarding describing another blogger as my "political opponent."

As most of you know, that accusation is clearly untrue under any sane definition of the phrase "political opponent." So how do you think Twatrick is going to respond?

* Flail madly, then change the subject?

* Insist on redefining normal English words to make his claim true by definition?

* Ignore my demonstration entirely?

* Realize he's made a completely erroneous claim and retract it in its entirety?

HAHAHA! I just threw that last one in for entertainment value. Really.

liberal supporter said...

I know, I know! (raising hand)

He will bide his time, then create a complete list of all your bad things hoping nobody will be bothered to do a point by point demolition, then claim the unaddressed points must be true, even if they were buried very deeply in his manure pile.