Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(2150)
-
▼
April
(194)
- Sometimes, a little knowledge isn't such a bad thing.
- Oh, dear ... this is going to be delicate.
- Why the Democrats must be destroyed.
- Democracy is on the march.
- Sometimes, snark just writes itself.
- It's a perspective thing, I guess.
- That's why you read the reviews.
- You can resign, but you can't hide.
- The liberal media! Run away! Run away!
- Apparently, evidence is overrated.
- Right-wing snark. As it were.
- "Get me copy, dammit!"
- "You keep using that word 'enterprise' ...
- Dear Dems: Just this once, pay attention.
- Beavis and Butthead do evolution.
- The political hackery of Gerard Kennedy.
- OK, this is just a bit weird.
- The first rule of blog fight club.
- Deja vu all over again.
- Republican family values, orgasm edition.
- Quick -- enjoy it while it lasts!
- The schizophrenia of the Globe and Mail.
- The power of the blog.
- Dear Gerard: Fuck off.
- Now THAT'S a lede.
- Ann Coulter does evolution.
- "Yeah, about that $1.7 billion ..."
- Buh bye, Wayne.
- The war, and the "long war."
- "Free speech" and really stupid arguments.
- Son of a bitch ... where do I sign up?
- Dear Revenue Canada ...
- Reaping what you sow.
- Free speech, "Hotter than Hell" and the wingnut pe...
- Stupid people never learn.
- Jesus' General does Trailer Park.
- The gorge also rises.
- If religion were run like a business.
- The last post you'll ever need to read.
- Michelle Malkin, "Jinx McHue" and moving on.
- The liberal threat.
- Presidential popularity, comparatively speaking.
- The joy of history.
- We're at war? Since when?
- The Bush administration as a parable.
- What the f**k is up with blogger?
- A sad, sad little play, in two parts.
- Just another dead Iraqi. (Part 2.)
- Words as weapons.
- Just another dead Iraqi. (Part 1.)
- You got your good, and you got your evil.
- Dear Wayne: Time for you to move on.
- Save the Internet.
- Well, well, well ... "Jinx" has a point.
- Always that "context" thing, isn't it?
- Juat another America-hating, traitorous little slut.
- Another broken CPC promise: Funding for the arts.
- Dear Judge: Bite me.
- Whack the wingnut pinata!
- With friends like this ...
- Cats doing very strange things.
- The Malkin standard.
- And now, the good news from Iraq ... oh, crap.
- Not "funny ha ha" so much as "funny ... yeesh."
- Ironically, you can't spell "theological" without ...
- About that Iraqi democracy thing ...
- The lunatics are now running the asylum.
- Dear aboriginals: You've come a long way, baby.
- Open thread.
- The stomach-churning hypocrisy of the Right.
- The origin of blog names.
- Our own Karl Rove? Aw, you shouldn't have.
- Unintentional humour, I'm sure.
- Oooooh, Jinx. Bad commenter. No biscuit.
- I (heart) Natalie Maines.
- They can dish it out, but they can't take it. Par...
- Plus ca change, etc etc ...
- Dear Americans: About that Second Amendment ...
- The utter hackery of Jinx McHue.
- Angry, angry, angry.
- Another CPC broken promise. Oh, yawn.
- Leaving a trail of stupidity wherever he goes ...
- They can dish it out, but they can't take it.
- We're all so angry, angry, angry.
- NEWS FLASH! Republicans caught lying! Go figure.
- Your mission, if you decide to accept it ...
- Wow, what a coincidence!
- I ... AM ... PISSED!
- But that's DIFFERENT!
- Dear Stephen:
- How stupid is the Western Standard's Ted Byfield?
- As progressives, it's our responsibility.
- Gerard Kennedy for Liberal leader? I don't think so.
- Oh, THIS old thing?
- One more time, let's talk about comments.
- Don't interrupt us, we're having a plan!
- Mark Steyn runs into reason ...
- Whoa, hello ... what's this?
- What a bunch of whiners.
- Uh oh ... more CPC broken promises.
-
▼
April
(194)
6 comments:
Sickening. I only read it halfway down to preserve brain cells.
"He is a man fired by a deep belief in the universal appeal of freedom, its transformative power, and its critical connection to international peace and stability."
If by freedom you mean suspending habeous corpus, spying and eavsdropping on private conversations of American citizens without warrant, lying to congress and the American people, waging pre-emptive war based on those lies, indeterminant arest and detention of prisoners without due process, advocating torture, secret prisons and the persecution of whistle blowers, then yeah he's all about freedom.
If on the otherhand you mean the actual meaning of the words fredom and liberty, then not so much.
Natan Sharansky is a wanker.
Sooooo, Dubya is the only thing standing between us and evil. Dear god....pass the barf bag!
Uh ...
Nepal: U.S. supporting the king against those fighting for democracy and freedom.
Venezuela: U.S. supports opposition (and a coup of) a popular democratically elected president.
Saudi Arabia: U.S. supports a "friendly" dictator.
And on and on go the examples. The word of the day is "hubris"!!
"...Mr. Bush, faced with overwhelming opposition, stands his ideological ground, motivated in large measure by what appears to be a refusal to countenance moral failure": I think most of us would agree that this is not avoiding "moral failure"; it is simply a dangerous inflexibility.
P.S. I am sorry to say I did not follow your advice to wait for at least an hour after eating: puke!
What do you expect from the WSJ in general and Sharansky in particular? "Wingnut fellates president in Wall Street Journal opinion pages" is hardly a "man bites dog" kinda story, is it?
P.S. Did you see this. It is, if anything, even more jaw-dropping:
Phyllis Schlafly’s latest, Does Feminism Control The Bush Administration?, will have you rolling.
Is President George W. Bush a feminist, or is he just a typical gentleman who is intimidated by feminists and unable to cope with their unreasonable demands, tantrums and rudeness? When it comes to public policy and personnel appointments, the result is the same.
--from feministing.com (link to full article available)
Post a Comment