Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(2150)
-
▼
April
(194)
- Sometimes, a little knowledge isn't such a bad thing.
- Oh, dear ... this is going to be delicate.
- Why the Democrats must be destroyed.
- Democracy is on the march.
- Sometimes, snark just writes itself.
- It's a perspective thing, I guess.
- That's why you read the reviews.
- You can resign, but you can't hide.
- The liberal media! Run away! Run away!
- Apparently, evidence is overrated.
- Right-wing snark. As it were.
- "Get me copy, dammit!"
- "You keep using that word 'enterprise' ...
- Dear Dems: Just this once, pay attention.
- Beavis and Butthead do evolution.
- The political hackery of Gerard Kennedy.
- OK, this is just a bit weird.
- The first rule of blog fight club.
- Deja vu all over again.
- Republican family values, orgasm edition.
- Quick -- enjoy it while it lasts!
- The schizophrenia of the Globe and Mail.
- The power of the blog.
- Dear Gerard: Fuck off.
- Now THAT'S a lede.
- Ann Coulter does evolution.
- "Yeah, about that $1.7 billion ..."
- Buh bye, Wayne.
- The war, and the "long war."
- "Free speech" and really stupid arguments.
- Son of a bitch ... where do I sign up?
- Dear Revenue Canada ...
- Reaping what you sow.
- Free speech, "Hotter than Hell" and the wingnut pe...
- Stupid people never learn.
- Jesus' General does Trailer Park.
- The gorge also rises.
- If religion were run like a business.
- The last post you'll ever need to read.
- Michelle Malkin, "Jinx McHue" and moving on.
- The liberal threat.
- Presidential popularity, comparatively speaking.
- The joy of history.
- We're at war? Since when?
- The Bush administration as a parable.
- What the f**k is up with blogger?
- A sad, sad little play, in two parts.
- Just another dead Iraqi. (Part 2.)
- Words as weapons.
- Just another dead Iraqi. (Part 1.)
- You got your good, and you got your evil.
- Dear Wayne: Time for you to move on.
- Save the Internet.
- Well, well, well ... "Jinx" has a point.
- Always that "context" thing, isn't it?
- Juat another America-hating, traitorous little slut.
- Another broken CPC promise: Funding for the arts.
- Dear Judge: Bite me.
- Whack the wingnut pinata!
- With friends like this ...
- Cats doing very strange things.
- The Malkin standard.
- And now, the good news from Iraq ... oh, crap.
- Not "funny ha ha" so much as "funny ... yeesh."
- Ironically, you can't spell "theological" without ...
- About that Iraqi democracy thing ...
- The lunatics are now running the asylum.
- Dear aboriginals: You've come a long way, baby.
- Open thread.
- The stomach-churning hypocrisy of the Right.
- The origin of blog names.
- Our own Karl Rove? Aw, you shouldn't have.
- Unintentional humour, I'm sure.
- Oooooh, Jinx. Bad commenter. No biscuit.
- I (heart) Natalie Maines.
- They can dish it out, but they can't take it. Par...
- Plus ca change, etc etc ...
- Dear Americans: About that Second Amendment ...
- The utter hackery of Jinx McHue.
- Angry, angry, angry.
- Another CPC broken promise. Oh, yawn.
- Leaving a trail of stupidity wherever he goes ...
- They can dish it out, but they can't take it.
- We're all so angry, angry, angry.
- NEWS FLASH! Republicans caught lying! Go figure.
- Your mission, if you decide to accept it ...
- Wow, what a coincidence!
- I ... AM ... PISSED!
- But that's DIFFERENT!
- Dear Stephen:
- How stupid is the Western Standard's Ted Byfield?
- As progressives, it's our responsibility.
- Gerard Kennedy for Liberal leader? I don't think so.
- Oh, THIS old thing?
- One more time, let's talk about comments.
- Don't interrupt us, we're having a plan!
- Mark Steyn runs into reason ...
- Whoa, hello ... what's this?
- What a bunch of whiners.
- Uh oh ... more CPC broken promises.
-
▼
April
(194)
3 comments:
Oh for the love of...
Wingnuts have a stupefying case of paranoia regarding vaginas, apparently. Not only are they terrified someone might be enjoying the use of one, they lose their minds at the idea of a woman having control over what happens with her own (and with other parts of her body).
I find it almost amusingly ironic that people who claim based solely upon their christian faith to be the authorities and protectors morality (and want collective stewardship over it 'for all of our own good'), have minds that conjure up the most disturbing possibilities imaginable in reference to sexuality.
How is it that the most supposedly moral among us are also the most sexually twisted?
"How is it that the most supposedly moral among us are also the most sexually twisted?"
Using fear,guilt, and avoidance of the opposite gender to prevent sexual activity in the young prevents people from knowing how to have a healthy sexual relationship.
There's a wonderful article published a year ago, by Walter A. Davis, that really addresses the question of why the people who talk so much about "morality" are so obsessed with sex, and way more deviant sex than most non-believers would dream of practising.
It's The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism. It's very dense (and the guy really needs to inject some commas), but it explains so much.
The upshot is that since fundies claim the nastiest parts of their psyche have been miraculously removed by salvation, and since those nasty bits keep threatening to surface again because they're still inside, the fundies must project them outward onto everyone else. And they have to keep doing it with more and more intensity, since that dark side just won't stay down.
So that would be why it's the fundies -- not gay people -- who are so obsessed with the thought that bestiality ABSOLUTELY! MUST! FOLLOW! after we endose same-sex marriage. No gay person I've ever known has ever mentioned that -- but the fundies can't think of anything else.
Excellent article. (And now I'm getting the feeling I may have advocated this article in another Comment here, recently. Ah well, if so, it's still a good article!)
Post a Comment