Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(2487)
-
▼
July
(187)
- When people start getting bored with the "birther"...
- "But enough about me. Let's talk about me."
- The public spanking of Shona Holmes.
- What Gordie said.
- So who was dumb enough to swallow THAT one?
- And this is where we juxtapose ...
- "So what you're saying is ..."
- And the mask slips just a little ...
- You keep using that word "ships" ...
- Yes, Steve, let's go with that.
- There's a reason the Blogging Tories are so stupid.
- Dear God in heaven, the burning stupid.
- I have no comeback.
- Folsom Prison Blues
- If you can fake sincerity, you can fake anything.
- Hmmmmmm ...
- Dear "Hunter": Please shut the fuck up.
- Yeah, they know where you live.
- Rock. Of. Ages.
- Rainy day reading.
- Sunday Cinema.
- Na na na na ... hey hey ...
- You keep using that phrase "fact checking," Dante ...
- I {heart} New York.
- Satire can be a beautiful thing ...
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Holy motherfucking stupid, Batman!
- Shall we play?
- On the road open thread.
- The question no one seems to be asking.
- Ah, the delicious mockery.
- Now, about those OTHER ideological murders ...
- Dear Stephen: Did NOT think that one through.
- Your Republican family values.
- I Timothy 2:11-14.
- Shona Holmes: Useful idiot or puppetmaster?
- And this is why we mock them.
- Douchebag! The Kathy Shaidle Chronicles.
- And with respect to basic human rights, fuck you.
- HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
- Security clearances and wingnuts.
- Several days late and a brain cell short.
- Still not quite grokking that "New Media" thingy.
- A Hero For All The People
- You can never be cynical enough.
- Beatdown!
- "Shut up," he explained.
- You sure you want to go down that road, Fred?
- Breaking news: Conservative Minister is complete ...
- The long, slow descent into wingnuttery.
- Poor Monte: Still having trouble grokking that wh...
- "Sorry" doesn't cut it anymore.
- ... and then there's reality.
- Oh, man, this explains so much.
- Low-hanging fruit: Jabba the Roy edition.
- Kinda late in the game for THAT kind of shit.
- Um ... let's talk about presidential eligibility, ...
- Quelle surprise.
- You sure you want to go down that road, Ezra?
- Sunday Cinema.
- Wingnut madness, down the memory hole.
- Here, Bernie, let me tighten that up for you.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- The major is a douchebag: The Stefan Cook Chronic...
- Say hello to a whole new level of whiny dumbassitude.
- Isn't that 15 minutes over yet?
- Shall we play?
- Why conservatives shouldn't do math.
- Stephen Taylor! Hacktacular!
- Science!
- Don't Harsh The Buzz
- Girls these days.
- The Major Cook Chronicles: The ongoing dumbassitude.
- Major Cook wingnuttery goodness.
- Stephen Taylor: Just another wingnut, but with be...
- About that Afghanistan thing ...
- Yeah, yeah, anti-Catholic, whatever.
- Major Stefan Cook open thread.
- The Stephen Harper Party of Canada: Standing up f...
- Actions have consequences.
- Dear Stephen Taylor: We need to chat. Seriously.
- Because they're fucking idiots, that's why.
- Waiting for the grownups to be back in charge.
- Yes, they really ARE that retarded.
- It's all in the headline, don't you think?
- Ouch.
- Stupid like a fox?
- Living life on the edge.
- And The Winner Is...
- Calling all lawyers.
- Yes, they really ARE as retarded as you suspected.
- Bernie Farber: Man of a thousand whiny grievances.
- And, curiously, he's never even MET Hunter.
- The Star's Kathy English: A thoroughly useful idiot.
- Obsession is in the eye of the beerholder.
- How's that Dick Cheney man-crush working out, Adam?
- Dear Dennis Kucinich:
- The important thing to remember, darlings ...
- The burning stupid of Jabba the Roy.
- Krauthammer Derangement Syndrome?
-
▼
July
(187)
8 comments:
That'll be the tory talking Point du jour.
No. This is your punchline:
"I would start with Paul Zed. He was the MP for the New Brunswick riding of Fundy-Royal. He is now the interim chief of staff to Liberal Party leader Michael Ignatieff. He is related by marriage to the Irving family, having been married to Judith Irving, the granddaughter of K.C. Irving.
I'm not saying Paul Zed had anything to do with this..."
This is true. Janke is a genius at discerning patterns in the chaos. His famous "six degrees of Cindy Sheehan's vagina" set a new standard for political analysis all around the World.
Actually, Ti-Guy, I was way more impressed with Janke's "Chinese toothpaste" phase. That was a classic.
I want to know who told Robert Fife that it was all a Liberal plot. This is the same Robert Fife after all, who was sure that Maher Arar was guilty because someone told him so.
I want to know who told Robert Fife that it was all a Liberal plot.
You'll never find that out. Most of our political news and analysis is founded on gossip we're all supposed to believe comes from "party insiders," "senior officials" and those speaking on the "condition of anonymity."
Die, journalism, die. From the ashes, a phoenix will rise. And if none doesn't, I doubt we'll even notice.
I want to know who told Robert Fife that it was all a Liberal plot.
It was Kory, who just "resigned" to muddy the trail. After all, the lies about Ignatieff that Harpo blurted on the world stage came from the PMO. As proven liars, why would we expect this to be any different.
The wafer gate story was such an obvious plant from day one. But not atypical for the CPC, is it?
Fife wants a Senate seat, just like Duffy.
Sorry.
I saw the video. http://canadiancynic.blogspot.com/2009/07/its-all-about-gays-isnt-it.html (Click through.)
You saw the video.
I cannot definitively say I saw HMPM Stephen Harper pocket the host; I can definitively say I did not see HMPM place the host in his mouth.
As far as the priest is concerned, if he did say he'd like to know what the prime minister did with the host, I 'm sure he has had the time to think through the business of raising questions about the head of the government.
As far as the newspaper is concerned, the current "[t]here was no credible support for these statements of fact at the time this article was published" says far too much. 1. It fails to take account of the video, which raises a credible, if not genuine, question of what Harper did with the host; 2. I've read a lot of retractions from newspapers in my life. This one doesn't fit the pattern. This is a shit-eating retraction. 3. To me, this retraction rings hollow.
Post a Comment