Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(2487)
-
▼
April
(203)
- I could milk this baby once a week and never get t...
- American conservatism: Slip-sliding away.
- Graduating from stupid, and moving on to dishonest.
- Socialists! Separatists!
- We'll have to start handing out rifles like Tic Tacs.
- Oh, for fuck's sake.
- Living in a perfect world, torture-wise.
- Dear Stephen: Let me make sure I understand you.
- Dear God ...
- And the utterly contrived outrage rolls on ...
- Transparency! Accountability! Oopsie!
- If you live in Alberta, you have the right to be a...
- Let the fake outrage commence in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
- It's because I'm cruel, that's why.
- Everything you ever needed to know about the stupid.
- Stand By Me
- CPC boondoggle du jour
- Sometimes, even wingnuts have a good idea.
- Yeah, the timing on that could have been better.
- Never mind, that was just dumb.
- Monday morning smackdown, JR-style.
- "Blowback?" I know not of what you speak.
- They might be cruel but, apparently, they're punct...
- Apparently, critical thinking is hard werk.
- To Bea ...
- Accountability! Transparency! Oopsie.
- Well, this sucks.
- Just brimming over with wrongability, as they say.
- Selective much, Hugh?
- Just when you think organized religion can't get a...
- Dear lefties: Fuck off and die.
- The incivility of the Le... um, hang on.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- "Serious charges" *bleep* "serious charges" *bleep...
- Come on, Red, the parallel was obvious.
- And when I say "die," don't think "metaphor."
- Yeah, yeah, another dead Canadian soldier, whatever.
- Yeah, yeah, law and order, whatever.
- I swear to God, ...
- My ears are burning.
- Apparently, education is the work of the devil.
- Oooooh, Neo's not going to like this.
- Just Friggin' Cool
- Oh, Lord, the burning stupid.
- The Ejankulator janks one again.
- It's not that she's a bigot, it's that she's a moron.
- What a difference a twatwaffle makes.
- If you use the phrase "free speech," I'm going to ...
- Amen
- What Dave said.
- Um ... what?
- Bigotry ... it just brings a tear to one's eye, do...
- You keep using the word "civility," Matthew ...
- More Better Musics
- For those without enough stupid in their lives, ...
- It's because they're idiots, that's why.
- Any Way The Wind Blows...
- Stephen Taylor, meet the New York Times.
- Dear tea-baggers:
- I'll be ordering my copy this afternoon.
- RIP J.G. Ballard
- Apparently, medical degree does not equal intellig...
- When it comes to snark, patience is a virtue.
- Stupid? Ignorant? Treasonous?
- There's reality, and then there's Hunter.
- You keep using that word.
- Breakfast with the arts.
- A Canadian citizen? Marooned overseas? When the ...
- The lack of awareness is truly breathtaking.
- HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
- There are times I weep for humanity.
- It's a matter of priorities.
- Good things come to those who aren't airheaded wan...
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Fire the Pope
- When stupid Conservative pundits punditize.
- Uh oh ... Mikey's pissed.
- Listen To The Laughter Off Camera
- Shall we play?
- Your Tonton Macoutes moment.
- Holy motherfucking stupid, Batman.
- Fellate much, Stephen?
- Hope and change?
- Sure, let's talk about suicide, Kate.
- And sometimes, a tea bag is just a tea bag.
- Yo, Stephen! Some political analysis, if you will.
- Go Cat Go!
- How can we miss you if you don't, you know, fuck off?
- Yeah, that's a bit of irony.
- I've seen this movie before.
- Whoop de fucking doo.
- And by "teabagger," I mean "imbecile."
- Stephen Taylor, not feeling the love.
- Incredible!
- Shriek! SHRIEK!! SHRIEK!!!
- Kate, for one, welcomes her new Republican overlords.
- Honesty. What a concept.
- Dear Canada:
- It's April 15, so get your teabags out.
- Racist or misogynist? You make the call.
-
▼
April
(203)
16 comments:
What was the problem?
wv="rocheme"
That post roched me!1
Upon further review, it was unnecessarily tacky. Now, if someone could find, somewhere, a "Stephen Taylor" who'd been busted for being a cross-dressing hooker, I'd reconsider.
I must have missed that post. Did you delete it?
In the interest of being fair, and playing devil's advocate, you just deleted a post.
Isn't that what you chastise the BTs for all the time?
Yes, but feel free to consider why what I did was slightly different.
In the interest of being fair, and playing devil's advocate...
...and juvenile, don't forget juvenile.
CC (and many, many others) chastise the wingnuts for deleting posts all the time because they delete posts all the time.
Anyway, put up a post calling KKKate a KKKunt. That's always accurate and appropriate.
i've got a couple i'd like to retract, but i leave 'em there anyway, just to keep me honest.
and i thought your point was well made with the previous post.
KEvron
You know what's funny? I read this blog all the time and I've yet to click on a link to take me to Stephen Taylor's blog to see what's up.
@Ti-Guy
I sincerely hope you're not referring to me.
I've never advocated against people deleting posts. Its their blog, its their prerogative. Just like its CC's prerogative to delete whatever he likes.
I was just pointing out that, since I didn't read the post, and have no idea of its content, the situation might not be all that different from what CC lambastes the BTs for. We - certainly I, at least - have no way of knowing.
@CC
I dunno why you did what you did, CC. I didn't read the post. Frankly, nor do I care about your reasons for doing so. Its your blog, do what you want. I've certainly written a few things in my day that I've later regretted and purged, so I'm not against what you did at all.
Its nice that you're at least informing us that you deleted the post - which is something we'd never see a BT do - but its still purging a post on a blog where you reprimand those who do the same.
I'm just pointing out that if you champion a standard, one should maintain that standard as best they can - which means living with the mistakes at times - and learning from it so one can be a better person in the future (or a more prudent writer). That's all I'm saying.
"put up a post calling KKKate a KKKunt. That's always accurate and appropriate."
*ahem*
KEvron
wv = "stshic"
I think it's really lame when people post long boring comments pointing out what they were pointing out in a previous long boring comment about how someone just did that thing they're always accusing dumber people of doing.
And no, I'm not talking to you, This is me posting, so there's no need to get all paranoid and trigger happy and start shooting people.
Sigh. Okay. I was talking about you, This is me posting.
But I'm sorry now and wish I hadn't posted that comment at all.
"In the interest of being fair, and playing devil's advocate, you just deleted a post.
Isn't that what you chastise the BTs for all the time?"
No, what CC chastises for is people who say horrible, racist, violent, homophobic crap and then when called on it pretend it never happened at all... the "post, what post" syndrome.
Cameron puts the puck on the net --deleting a post and telling people you have deleted it and why and offering a mea culpa is hardly the same as the "down the memory hole" approach that CC criticizes.
I read the original and though I thought it was a bit ribauld, I didn't think it was that bad. Though, given the subject matter of the "Stephen Taylor" of the post, it may have crossed a line...one that a lawyer may have been interested in?
Considering this is the only time that I know of that CC has deleted a post and he did it for reasons for fairness and taste rather than to quash dissent, I'll cut him some slack.
it's not as if it said "fuck stephen taylor and his grief!"
KEvron, pressing his luck
Post a Comment