Tuesday, May 20, 2008

That's it Patrick; you're outta here.


And as much as I like to cut people buckets of slack, I think it's time for you to leave, Patrick. But let's understand why I'm asking this of you.

It's not because I disagree with anything you've left as a comment, oh no. Rather, it's because you have more than abused my hospitality by wandering by and simply pitching a tent in my comments section and making yourself at home. And, not surprisingly, there's a fairly obvious reason for that.

It's because you don't get any readers at that litter box of a blog of yours. So, instead of engaging people over there, you come here ... where all the readers are.

I don't care what rubbish you want to spew, Patrick, or who you want to spew it to. But I think it's way past time that you stopped riding my blog's coattails and took this back to your place, although I can certainly see why you're probably not keen on that idea -- no one visits there.

But, really, that's not my problem. If you think you have such devastating intellect, then others should follow you home to continue the conversation. And if they don't, well, it's probably because you're a pretentious, vacuous retard. So -- and I say this with the utmost respect -- please take your tiresome act and go away. If any of my readers want to continue the discussion, they know where to find you. Quite simply, your act has worn thin here and you no longer have any entertainment value.

And I'm tired of you leeching off of my popularity. If you want readers, try getting them the old-fashioned way -- by earning them.

56 comments:

Patrick Ross said...

ROTFL

No, you just can't stand it when someone stands up to you and your little coterie of wannabe bullies.

You better get ready to give that pinky finger of yours a workout, pal, because you're apparently going to be hitting that delete key a lot.

I am never going away. You've started something you can never, ever, finish

Adam C said...

...and Patrick gets banned for, what is it, the 7th time?

What would help is if people stopped trying to engage him. He's not interested in honest discussion. He likes it when he gets insulted; that's what keeps him coming back.

He's just a troll with his own blog. Like any troll, if you stop responding to him, he'll go away.

Zorpheous said...

Time to upgrade to Haloscan CC.

Mr. Ross is being more ross-holier than normal I see. So what bee flew up his butt? You made fun of John McSame or something?

You know Paddy boy, just a word of advice. Sometimes the blogging host doesn't need to respond to commenter or debate them. The person in question does an excellent job of making themselves look like a complete idiot as they do a mad monkey dance to attract host bloggers attention. To put it simply Paddy, Cynic dropped in a round room and told you to sit in a corner.

I am never going away. You've started something you can never, ever, finish

Oooo, starting to sound like cyber stalker there Paddy,... not good, not good at all,.... Hey Paddy,... want a banana?

Patrick Ross said...

I just love listening to you people make hypocrites of yourselves.

Adam:

How would you justify a comment like that considering that this site is founded on the refusal to debate.

As a matter of fact, just yesterday I challenged Cynic to explain why it is that he expects himself to be excused for something that he apparently wants to excoriate John McCain for. He refused that debate.

As a matter of fact, there has never been anything resembling honest debate on this site. Whenever challenged, you clowns just say "oh, they aren't capable of debate", then refuse.

Then again, I wouldn't want you to strain yourself by being, you know... honest.

And Zorpheus:

You realize it's impossible to take a single word out of your mouth seriously, right? You're as big a hypocrite as anyone on this site. Considering that you're competing with Canadian Cynic and Martin Rayner for that distinction, that's really saying something.

liberal supporter said...

CC asked me to drop this, and I refused, offering to leave if he says so. He has not said so.

Unlike PR, I am couth enough to leave when the host requests it. Until such time, as long as PR shows up here and does not answer my question, I will continue to pose it.


For the fifth time today, PR, the question you have not answered. Do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?

Yes or no?

Patrick Ross said...

My answer, once again:

Liberal Supporter, we know you condone and applaud assaults on senior citizens.

My question, once again:

Do you also slap your grandparents around when they say something that you don't like?

LuLu said...

Sweet dancing Jesus, I spend the day in meetings and Patsy Pantload goes full-metal, special-needs, frothing-at-the-mouth crazy. That's just sad.

If, you know, by sad I really mean no fucking surprise whatsover. I think you finally broke him, CC.

Patrick Ross said...

In your black-and-white dreams.

This very post is evidence that, if anything, I've broken Cynic. I can smell the blood from here.

And if you hateful pieces of human garbage really want to be rid of me here, you'd just better go ahead and get Haloscan.

Not that it'll ever end. I've still got my own blog to continue to point out to people what hateful, ridiculously stupid pieces of trash you really are. That will never stop. Ever.

You pieces of shit need to wake up to the news: I'm fucking done playing nice with you. From here on out, it's fucking war.

liberal supporter said...

Do you also slap your grandparents around when they say something that you don't like?
I answered this in the other thread, but I will repeat it here:

No.


Now I would like you to answer my question, which I have asked six times already. Do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?

Yes or no?

Patrick Ross said...

And like I said, I've already answered your question. You've refused to listen to the answer, and I'm flat-out not playing these games with you.

Now you answer my question:

Would you tolerate someone else assaulting your grand parents for saying something they don't like?

Yes or no?

LuLu said...

*yawn*

Shorter Patsy Pantload: I'll get you ... and your little dog, too!!!

liberal supporter said...

I repeated my answer even though it had already been given. You can too.

You have not answered, you have changed the question.

Seventh time. Do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?

Yes or no?

Patrick Ross said...

I have done no such thing, and can continue this silly charade for as long as you can.

If you won't accept the answer as given, I'm not going to repeat it for you.

But I want an answer to my -- actually topical to the debate you're so eager to continue -- question:

Would you tolerate someone assaulting your grand parents for saying something they don't like?

Yes or no?

liberal supporter said...

Sorry PR, you do not have the remote. You cannot change the channel. I have repeated my answer to your first question. You can repeat your answer to my first question. You are simply copying incessant demanding of an answer. Can you not come up with something more imaginative? Or simply answer as I did to you. Have you no manners?


Eighth time. Do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?

Yes or no?

Zorpheous said...

I'm a Hypocrite? Gee I thought I was Virgo. So Paddy boy, exactly what makes me a Hypocrite, it can be applied to so many topics, which exact area of hypocracy am I specializing in? Do tell.

Patrick Ross said...

ROTFL

I'd recount what this debate is actually about, but it's plainly evident that doing that would be as futile as recounting (again) the answer to your question.

The only one here trying to change the channel is you. And if I were you, I suppose I would too.

But I'm not going to allow you that privilege.

Would you tolerate someone attacking your grand parents because they said something they don't like?

Yes or no?

Zorpheous said...

What's the problem with providing a clear and precise answer to each others questions guys? You both either don't like how the other will will spin the answer, or the answer is a little more complex than a yes or no. Sorry have been following LS and PR's pee'ing match so I really don't know the answer

Red Tory said...

Who uses “ROTFL”? Dude, nobody puts in the T. What a useless tit.

Also, nobody wants to imagine a corpulent sack of shit rolling on the floor.

KEvron said...

it's your blog, cc, and i would never tell you how to run it. just want to say, however, that, when posting about another blogger, it's only fair to extend to them free say on that post. you can see the logic in that.

KEvron

KEvron said...

"there has never been anything resembling honest debate on this site."

lol! like the rat catcher who also breeds rats.

you get what you earn, stoopid.

KEvron

Kelseigh said...

I'm a little curious how Twatrick managed to type the word "honest" without bursting into flames.

Maybe he was trying to type something else and misspelled it?

liberal supporter said...

What's the problem with providing a clear and precise answer to each others questions guys?
I have already answered one, he has asked a second. I would like an answer to my first before we proceed.

You both either don't like how the other will will spin the answer, or the answer is a little more complex than a yes or no.
I am quite certain he will spin anything I say. That is irrelevant. What is important is that he essentially refuses to answer a simple question. Each of his "answers" consists of answering some other question than mine, claiming he already answered, or simple name calling. If he already answered, it should be straightforward to repeat it.

Sorry have been following LS and PR's pee'ing match so I really don't know the answer

We started with me asking PR a question. He chose not to answer and instead asked me a question. I did answer his question. The answer was "No". I then asked him to answer mine. He now claims he "already did answer", and refuses to repeat the answer. He repeated his first question in a different thread, and I repeated my answer. He then asked a second question, and I am now demanding that he answer my first one, instead of continuing to obfuscate.

Zorpheous said...

Pee'ing matches are fun, but in the end both people end up cold wet legs.

I take it this is about the twit Anti-Abortion protester who got knock off his car after enraging a young man to the point that he scaled an 8 foot fence to get at him?

Personally, if I remember correctly the police and DA dropped the charges after investigating the case a little more completely, correct?

KEvron said...

charges were reduced to a misdemeanor charge. considering the strenuous circumstances, that seems appropriate.

KEvron

liberal supporter said...

I take it this is about the twit Anti-Abortion protester who got knock off his car after enraging a young man to the point that he scaled an 8 foot fence to get at him?
I must doff my hat to PR then, he has successfully bamboozled you. Snell was PR's topic, not mine. I simply asked him a question, nine times now. It is a question I have been asking anti-choicers before I even heard of the Snell case. He managed to obfuscate and not answer the question, and now has convinced you this was the question all along.

Again, for the tenth time. PR, do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?

Yes or no?

Ti-Guy said...

You pieces of shit need to wake up to the news: I'm fucking done playing nice with you. From here on out, it's fucking war.

Bring it on, Fatsy!

Heh.

The Seer said...

"Bring it on[?]"

I thought that was Dear Leader's line.

Gabe said...

All I can contribute to this is:
INTERNET. SERIOUS BUSINESS.

Cameron Campbell said...

well smote gabe..

Patrick Ross said...

"I'm a little curious how Twatrick managed to type the word "honest" without bursting into flames."

That's simple. Unlike you irredeemably dishonest fuckwits, I actually am honest.

Simple enough for you, scumbag?

Now, on to -- actually -- less important things:

Liberal Supporter:

I've answered your question. Now you answer mine:

Would you tolerate someone assaulting your grand parents for saying something they didn't like?

Yes or no?

KEvron said...

"Would you tolerate someone assaulting your grand parents for saying something they didn't like?"

i would seek misdemeanor charges. ta-da!

KEvron

liberal supporter said...

Liberal Supporter:

I've answered your question. Now you answer mine:

Would you tolerate someone assaulting your grand parents for saying something they didn't like?

Yes or no?


No, you did not answer my question. If you did, you could easily reproduce your answer now. But you haven't. Do you believe your time is so precious you cannot repeat an answer you allege to have given?

You asked me a question, I answered. Twice. Why can you not answer?


For the eleventh time. PR, do you or do you not support or condone the killing of abortion doctors?

Yes or no?

Zorpheous said...

What if my Grandfather was,... oh say Hitler? Or maybe say Osama bin Laden? Or maybe Saddam? You know Paddy, since we are dealing in hyprocritical, hypotheticals,... lets pull out the stops.

KEvron said...

what if spartacus had a piper cub?

KEvron

LuLu said...

What if Patsy wasn't a pathologically dishonest fuckwit with delusions of adequacy? And some pretty obvious anger management/stalker-in-the-making issues?

Zorpheous said...

What if my Grandfather said "Fuck you Wanda and your Grief" at her son's funeral?

Sorry that's the Bloody Caesars talking ~hickup~

Zorpheous said...

And if my Grndmother had wheels, she'd be a wagon,... or maybe a car,... she did have a lot of gas,...

Zorpheous said...

Anyhoo Paddy, you throw out the hypocrite label, yet you fail to back up claim.... So please do explain to me how I am hypocrite.

KEvron said...

or don't....

KEvron

Zorpheous said...

but it's the only way I can learn

jj said...

"From here on out, it's fucking war."

Internet War, what is it good for!?

Seriously LS, stop arguing with him, it's pointless. That is his M.O. -- answering questions with questions and refusing to acknowledge that you've already answered his question.

Consider the experience a lesson in Leg-Humping 101.

M@ said...

"From here on out, it's fucking war."

Remember that bit in Family Guy when Peter says "Oh yeah? Him and what army?" and Chris says "the US Army" and Peter says "Oh. That's a good army."?

Yeah, this situation is the exact opposite of that.

I hope Patrick enjoys his war. It's the same as a lot of chickenhawk wars: fought in solitude, without the putative enemy knowing it was even going on. So good luck, Patrick. Let us know when you've "won".

The Seer said...

Worse that twatrick: http://www.johnmccain.com/ActionCenter/BlogInteract/BlogInteract.aspx

CC said...

Oh, for fuck sakes, kids, let me help you out. Patsy Ross has made it abundantly clear, on at least one previous occasion, that he unequivocally supports the murder of medical professionals that perform abortions.

Now, can we please move on? Thank you.

Patrick Ross said...

"Oh, for fuck sakes, kids, let me help you out. Patsy Ross has made it abundantly clear, on at least one previous occasion, that he unequivocally supports the murder of medical professionals that perform abortions."

That is unequivocally a lie, Cynic, and you know it.

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

That is unequivocally a lie, Cynic, and you know it.

No it isn't. I remember it. It was a while ago, if memory serves.

M@ said...

That is unequivocally a lie, Cynic, and you know it.

If that were so, wouldn't it be easier to answer the question?

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you supported the killing of abortion doctors, though, Patrick, given your readiness to "declare war" over relatively trivial things.

Patrick Ross said...

That is a lie. You pieces of shit know it.

And I'm not answering questions that I've already answered and that you lying pieces of garbage know I've already answered.

Needless to say, we aren't done here. Not by a fucking longshot.

Mike said...

One word Patsy:

Chloropromazine.

Think about it.

M@ said...

And I'm not answering questions that I've already answered and that you lying pieces of garbage know I've already answered.

Where did you answer it? I'd love to go read that answer. Or did you answer LS by phone, maybe?

Gosh, all those italics. Quite intense. I guess this means war -- and not just any old war, but war like when Bugs Bunny said in the bullfighting episode.

Go Bugs! I mean Patrick!

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

If Patrick has answered the question, as he indicates (I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here), and he is saying that what's written above is a lie (giving him the benefit of the doubt again), it follows that he answered the other way. He condemns the murder of medical professionals who perform abortions.

We have our answer. Drawing it out was a painful, yes, but at last we know. Thank you, Patrick.

Patrick Ross said...

You ridiculous fuckwits could have figured that out fucking months ago by simply reading what was already written.

Yet, throughout this entire episode you have categorically refused to. I would be surprised if it wasn't the impecably dishonest way you people insist on operating.

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

Oh.

Red Tory said...

Thus spake The Diamond Kid aka Kid Cash aka Thunderbolt Ross aka Tha Flamethrower aka The Mindbender aka...

Did "you people" expect a straight answer from this doughy fuckwit?

Dream on. He's a kook.

LuLu said...

*Double yawn*

Impecably [sic] is spelled with two c’s, Patsy. I just thought you needed to know that since you’re alllllllll about the accuracy.

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

I'm not so sure, Lulu. I think Patrick is all about the octangle.