Again, as I read it, if you try to pin the blame on your lawyers this way, you effectively waive lawyer-client privilege, since you need to establish that your lawyers actually gave you this advice, and that they did it in a legally convincing and defensible way. In other words, if you want to blame your lawyers for giving you really bad advice, you've pretty much allowed the other side access to all of those normally privileged communications.
Thoughts? I can't imagine any of those lawyers being thrilled with this idea.
P.S. Here is a nice overview of what Trump is thinking of unleashing on his own lawyers.
3 comments:
His lawyers might not be thrilled with this possible development, but I'm assuming that at this point all they truly care about it is getting paid, given Trump's penchant of not paying contractors, venues that hosted Trump rallies, other lawyers, etc.
Lawyering for Trump results in any or all of the following: not being paid, disbarment, and indictment. It's a wonder he still manages to find one.
If he used that defense, he would no doubt next rant about the state "violating his attorney-client privilege."
Post a Comment