There was this. And then there was this.
Yes, Denyse, you did get a lot of traffic yesterday -- the whole world was laughing at you. Lord, what a twatwaffle.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(2487)
-
▼
January
(276)
- So Long Dumbass
- Did you know the word "gullible" isn't in the dict...
- And suddenly, the fetus fetishists go quiet ...
- Just when you think you've reached the bottom of t...
- The real question is ...
- There's nuanced and thoughtful conservative pundit...
- And that's when things turned ugly ...
- Yes, I can haz bluez.
- Pardon my sweeping generalization.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- The lack of self-awareness is amusing.
- Sunday Saturday morning irreverence.
- Mea. Culpa.
- Outrage can be so context dependent, can't it?
- The joys of mindless superstitution.
- Would someone please spit on Hunter?
- How soon the retarded forget.
- Norm Coleman: Douchebag!
- Oh, fuck me, that's brilliant.
- Dear CP24: Burst into flame and die.
- And sometimes snark fails you ...
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
- That was then. This is now. Shut the hell up.
- What LuLu said, and more.
- There’s no whore like a Reformatory whore.
- Disturbing similarities in the animal kingdom.
- The deficit! It just came out of nowhere!
- Ceiling Cat can haz bluez?
- Irony, where is thy boot to the nads?
- No one loves snow as much as I do!
- The Norm Coleman Douchebag Chronicles.
- I can haz deficit?
- The painfully burning stupid.
- I'm dancing as fast as I can.
- Buyer's remorse, wingnut style.
- No reason.
- And that works just fine for me, thanks.
- The only good Democrat ...
- Blogging Tories Short Takes: Jan 28, 2009.
- The Norm Coleman Chronicles: The douchebagitude.
- OK, fine.
- Oh, sweet Jesus ...
- It's budget day, boys and girls!
- Oh, those Republican morals and ethics.
- That's what happens when you don't keep an eye on ...
- I may never stop laughing.
- Someone didn't get the memo.
- Let me explain the word "dissent" to you, Mathew.
- I cream myself over dead people.
- What. The.
- When stupid Blogging Tories blog, well, stupidly.
- When Web 2.0 meets Stupid 0.01...
- Go!
- But, but, but … the bible says I can.
- Yeah, funny story ...
- And that "let justice take its course" thing? Not...
- I don't need any more stupid in my life.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Part deux.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Oh, fuck me.
- I'm just sayin', ya know?
- And we laughed and laughed ...
- I can haz bluez?
- "Ceasefire?" Ehhh ... not so much.
- "A blessing in disguise".
- Pharyngula'ed in Calgary!
- Awwwwwwwwwkward.
- Dear Gordo: Whatever happened to shutting the fuc...
- Because I said so.
- The gorge rising is now complete.
- Sunday Funnies.
- I'm sorry ... is this a joke?
- Oh, the depressingly burning stupid.
- Yes, Doc, that'll solve the problem.
- Dear Catholic Church: Fuck off.
- The party of the troops?
- Well, OK, except for that.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- James speak. You listen.
- Irony, where is thy towel snap to the nads?
- Pastor Ted Rides Again!
- Sometimes, people have the right idea.
- 'Cuz that's different. No, really.
- Bow. James Bow. Be there.
- It helps to have a long memory.
- Oh for fuck’s sake ...
- The Angry, Angry Left.
- Cocksucking separatist support for me, but not for...
- Self-absorption deja vu.
- This could get delicious.
- Good Will Twatsy.
- Sure, what the hell, let's talk about accountability.
- The grownups are back! The grownups are back!
- And there's that germ theory of disease, too.
- Um ... ewwwwwwwwwwwww?
- A little unclear on the concept.
- Therefore, black people should never be President.
- I don't think this one's going to get old.
- When a wanker's snark would exceed her grasp.
- LuLu is very, very, VERY tired.
- Constitutional kerners are go!
-
▼
January
(276)
9 comments:
She's like the kid who eats bugs for a dollar and then feels so proud about getting attention from peers.
She's got a point about that Orchid Mantis, though. Come to think of it, how did animals without teeth, or with just a tooth or two, catch any prey?
wv= "fixed"
Does she REALLY believe she can get away with claiming that Darwin invented racism?
The racism canard is based on this:
The book's full title is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, while for the 6th edition of 1872 the title was changed to The Origin of Species.
In those days, "race" was part of the biological taxonomy system, i.e. phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, and followed "species". Different species of the same genus can sometimes interbreed, but all races of a species can interbreed.
"Race", for example, is the way the huge variety of dogs are classified, though today we call them "breeds". Natural selection would readily explain some breeds or races prevailing in certain environments due to the advantages of the minor physical differences they have. Species differentiation is consider the result of true mutation, while race differentiation is due to environmental adaptation, which is why they were given separate mention in the original title.
However, since Darwin was originally an Anglican, later an Agnostic (and NOT atheist), the favouring of "races" would be done by natural selection, which is to say, done by laws of nature as laid down by God. So who is she calling a racist again?
Shorter liberal supporter: "she is literally judging a book by its cover"
She's got a point about that Orchid Mantis, though. Come to think of it, how did animals without teeth, or with just a tooth or two, catch any prey
I'm guessing the same way that birds do it.
How I wish she would open up her comments section for the world.
I don't often use the term 'shit for brains', but here we are.
I wonder if she'd pass the "mirror" test for self awareness...
I don't often use the term 'shit for brains', but here we are.
She should welcome that, since having shit for brains would confer no evolutionary advantage, she is living proof against natural selection.
I wonder if she'd pass the "mirror" test for self awareness..
Based on the way she parses book titles, does a keyword lookup and filters the results based on her own prejudices, I don't think she'd even pass the Turing test.
Post a Comment