Whiny-ass titty baby or childish liar? We report, you decide.

This is what happens when you wander onto someone else's turf, get your ass handed to you on a plate, then run crying home and let your friends drop by to console and tell you what a big meanie that bully was.

Poor Jonathan. All that time spent filling up my comments sections today, and he couldn't even keep his lies straight. On the one hand, in the earlier comments section, he was adamant that serial sexual predator Mark Foley "resigned." And yet, in the piece I link to above, Jonathan has suddenly changed his story, claiming that Foley "was booted." So which is it, Jonathan? Did he voluntarily step down? Or was he forcibly terminated? Big difference there. Might be nice if you could tell a consistent story. [Ed: Poor Jonathan's not the only one with consistency problems. Seems to be a lot of that going around these days.]

Jonathan has also been whinging on about how this smear campaign against Foley is incredibly convenient and obviously politically motivated, even though the main reporter for the story, ABC's Brian Ross, has made it clear that his main sources were, in fact, Republicans:

Mr. Ross dismissed suggestions by some Republicans that the news was disseminated as part of a smear campaign against Mr. Foley.

“I hate to give up sources, but to the extent that I know the political parties of any of the people who helped us, it would be the same party,” Mr. Ross said, referring to Republicans.

Ooooh, that has to put a dent in the old conspiracy theory, doesn't it, Jonathan?

And as for this bit by Jonathan:

Republicans and conservatives have nothing to apologize for on Foley (so far). Unless they covered anything up, they handle the situation well.

I've ceased caring what colour the sky is on Jonathan's planet. Anyone who can write something like that in all seriousness is utterly beyond redemption. But I'm guessing you'd already figured that out by now.