Pursuant to nothing of relevance, it's amusing to note that, earlier this year, Patrick Ross of Lloydminster was crowing publicly about how he had nothing to worry about because ... something something perjury nullity:
Huh. And how did that accusation of perjury work out? Oh, right ...
The end result being:
11 days and counting ...
BONUS TRACK: Tweets that, in retrospect, did not age well:
THE AWAKENINGS OF SELF_AWARENESS ...
BY THE WAY ... while this is simply piling on, it's worth sharing the final paragraph of Patrick's argument wherein he was trying to convince the Court to disallow the registration of my judgment in Saskatchewan:
In short, the thrust of Patrick's argument had nothing to do with legalities or precedent; it was, quite simply, "This would be very, very bad for me."
Well, yes, that's sort of the whole point of a massive judgment, isn't it?
7 comments:
The funniest four words in Canadian jurisprudence: "Patrick Ross - Self-Represented"
The second four funniest words in Canadian jurisprudence from Patrick Ross: "Nothing to worry about."
Once the collection starts, if you need someone local to pick up all of Patrick's stuff, I live just outside of Lloyd, and I have a pickup truck and a garage. It would be worth taking the time just for the amusement value to see what total garbage represents all of Patrick's worldly possessions.
Shorter Patrick Ross: "You can't do this because I say that the other party lied"
Shorter Courts: "Watch me"
Cynic, I'm having a bad day. Can you post Patrick's full argument? I need a good laugh. I think we all need a good laugh!
I would prefer not to, since it repeats much of the same horrific defamation that got Patrick into so much trouble in the first place, and I don't want to have that stuff circulating all over again.
Anon 10:57am here. Totally understand!
Post a Comment