Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(2487)
-
▼
December
(261)
- Oh, this should be good.
- Dear Stephen:
- Stephen Harper: The man who would (not) be Prime ...
- Holy. Freakin'. God.
- It seems like only yesterday ...
- Who will be the first Blogging Tory to go Charles ...
- Good times at Delisle High.
- Alternative Feces Substitute
- Wasn't it just a few months ago?
- Let the deportations begin.
- Prorogation! Boo-yah!
- Kittehs. Going once, going twice ...
- It's not even funny anymore.
- Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark.
- Prorogue? Sure, why not?
- "Fight them. Fight them. Fight them."
- Sure, what could possibly go wrong?
- Who would be the right person to mock with this?
- Violence for thee, but not for me.
- Well, if you're going to keep track ...
- One of these things is not like the others.
- Ix-nay on the earning-lay, Mike.
- About that whole "fascist" label ...
- I'd give 'em a left, and a right, and ...
- Sorry, what was the job description again?
- An idiot and his money ...
- The irony will make your eyes bleed.
- I'd like to thank the Blogademy ...
- "But ... but ... but ... somebody else!!"
- Sometimes, accuracy is inherently unattainable.
- As God is my witness ...
- "I'll give 'em a left, and a right, and a ... AHHH...
- The first rule of holes, Walker, ...
- Victoria's Secret -- the hacker edition.
- Yeah, it's pretty much like that.
- I think I see the flaw in your logic.
- I love being right about everything all the time.
- Blogging Tory Kate McMillan: Wishing violent deat...
- Ah, the Denyseitude.
- Dear Readers Who Are Required To Wear CCM Helmets ...
- Adventures In Thinkering! (Redux)
- Jason Kenney: Boy meets world.
- Oh My
- Gosh ... who might have seen THAT coming?
- The stupid. It burns.
- I want Joe Lieberman dead.
- Ezra wants to lecture you on class and decorum.
- Dear Italy: You suck.
- And that's where I stopped reading.
- Lezbians!
- Yeah, that'll show 'em.
- I sense a pattern here ...
- Behold, the dumbassitude.
- It's because they're all total fucking idiots, tha...
- Free Me speech!
- Regarding "CanadianSense" ...
- Darcey would like to thank the academy ...
- Dawggy and me.
- And a Happy Holidays Merry Christmas to one and all.
- Jason Kenney: EPIC FAIL!
- Twitter!
- Geez, Mark, hyperbolize much?
- Dear Reform Party of Canda: At what point are thi...
- There are no words.
- The entertainment value just went up a notch.
- Any interest in a free Linux seminar over the holi...
- The true face of cowardice.
- Who is Blogging Tory "CanadianSense"? Yes, I want...
- Can someone sue Ezra Levant?
- The perpetual boorishness of Kate McMillan.
- Just cuz.
- I'm just sayin' ...
- Thank ya, thank ya very much.
- Yeah, it's kind of like that.
- Sure, let's talk about civility.
- Memmmmmmmmories ...
- A job well done.
- So Nice...
- Heh. Indeed.
- Popcorn!
- Time to dig deep, kids: Part deux.
- Time to dig deep, kids. Somebody needs you.
- Outrage open thread.
- Rosie DiManno: Useful idiot.
- And here's where we juxtapose.
- Excuse me while I make shit up.
- Because IOKIYAC (It's OK if you're a conservative).
- No, stop, you're killing me!
- And this is why we don't actually try to engage th...
- Yeah, about that "Biblical Law" ...
- I only do it because I can.
- Dear Canadians: Take a good look at your future.
- ZOMG!!11!1!!! They're on to us!
- So, is there any tread left on the tires?
- The nad-snapping irony of it all.
- A trifecta of dumbth.
- The knee-slapping hilarity of dead journalists.
- KAIROS and the cognitive dissonance of idiots.
- What Boris said.
- The entertainment never ends.
-
▼
December
(261)
6 comments:
Oh, I dunno. Maybe the NP has read the writing and realized that being a hard right rag is no way to make a profit, and is starting to seed the place for a move to centre-right where they can make a few bucks.
What makes them think publishing Dr. Dawg will make them any profit? If I want to know what Dawg thinks, I'll go read his blog. I only hope he's getting paid for this but -- no offense, Dawg -- I still wouldn't pay real money for that worthless rag.
By the way, I wonder why they didn't let him comment under a pseudonym. They have a history of that sort of thing, as I recall.
What makes them think publishing Dr. Dawg will make them any profit?
After the Raphael lawsuit, his writing activities for Q4 are actually turning a profit, unlike the NP. So I would surmise that they've brought him in as a turnaround artist. They are hoping he is the Lee Iaccoca of print!
I wonder why they didn't let him comment under a pseudonym.
Considering the above, his profitability would be diminished if he used a pseudonym. You can't libel a pseudonym. Even when the real person behind the name is known, it is much less ambiguous if a real name is libeled, and the potential settlement could be larger.
Hahahaha! The first thing the editor said to me was that they had a "no pseudonyms" policy, and would that dampen my enthusiasm?
I think they learned something from he who shall remain nameless.
Incidentally, NP will only be picking up blogposts. You really don't have to venture there unless you're curious about the industrial-strength trollery. Something to behold.
Dr. Dawg, best of luck over there but I hope you've got an industrial strength flea collar.
Post a Comment