... the Official Jew's Official Jew Ezra Levant has words for today's wankers:
I had a great time last week at the Vancouver Jewish Book Festival. I've done a ton of events this past year in support of my book, Shakedown, but in a way my favourite ones were at Jewish venues. That's because I see it as my personal duty to disabuse Jews of the notion that censorship is in any way compatible with Jewish values.
I await Ezra's savage condemnation of his fellow Blogging Tories with much anticipation.
15 comments:
"That's because I see it as my personal duty to disabuse Jews of the notion that censorship is in any way compatible with Jewish values."
When Ezra launched his "Union of Bloggers" and solicited donations, I posted several very polite queries on his site about the membership criteria, accountability for funds, reporting to membership, and how this "union" was going to be governed.
Not one question ever showed up...just fawning responses and protestations of undying love from the usual sycophants.
As others have noted, there is simply no bottom to the hypocrisy of the "Me Speech" crowd.
Thin-skinned Jews set the precedent, and radical Muslims are following it.
It's amazing to see Ezra blame this all on the Jews.
"if it's kosher it's halal"
Ooh, not so fast O.J.
Halal is a comprehensive Islamic term encompassing not only the matters of food and drink, but all other matters of daily life. Islam being the final and perfect way of life for humanity, it supersedes all the previously revealed religions including Christianity and Judaism. The rituals in all matters were perfected by God (al-Quran 5:3)
Also, while marshmallows and yogurt may be kosher, they are not halal.
"Balbulican said...
When Ezra launched his "Union of Bloggers" and solicited donations, I posted several very polite queries on his site about the membership criteria, accountability for funds, reporting to membership, and how this "union" was going to be governed.
Not one question ever showed up...just fawning responses and protestations of undying love from the usual sycophants.
As others have noted, there is simply no bottom to the hypocrisy of the "Me Speech" crowd."
No bottom to the hypocrisy?
Do you mean when an abuser of women asks for donations to a battered woman's shelter so he can somehow feel vindicated?
That kind of bottomless hypocrisy?
Do you mean when an abuser of women...
No one's interested in your past history, you single-at-58 dateless wonder.
bocanut makes an interesting accusation:
"Do you mean when an abuser of women asks for donations to a battered woman's shelter so he can somehow feel vindicated?"
So, bocanut, let me make sure I'm not misunderstanding this -- you are, in a public forum, explicitly accusing me of being "an abuser of women," is that correct?
Is that what you're saying, bocanut? I want there to be no mistake here -- you are directly and unambiguously accusing me of being a woman abuser, that's the position you're taking here?
I just want there to be no possible confusion about what you're saying.
"That kind of bottomless hypocrisy?"
No. I meant the kind of bottomless hypocrisy I was describing.
Funny. Germans don't point to Stalin's slaughter of the kulaks to excuse the Holocaust - I wonder why it's such a popular defense for the indefensible among not-too-bright bloggers?
When anyone uses derogatory terms about women in general and specifically on a daily basis,tells the mother of a slain soldier "to go fuck her grief",some people would consider that abusive.
some people would consider that abusive.
So is cyber-harassment, you troll.
Is there any history of stalking in your past?
When anyone uses derogatory terms about women in general.
Which nobody here does.
and specifically on a daily basis,
You're talking about name calling of pseudonyms, right? Okey dokey.
tells the mother of a slain soldier "to go fuck her grief",
This is the same misquote you tried to flog last week. Since you were told it is a misquote and were directed to the actual entire post, you can no longer claim to be misinformed. Therefore your misquote is a lie. Which makes you a liar.
It was clearly a rebuke of a mother of a dead soldier who was being trotted out by our government and its partisan supporters, to silence opposition to their total botching of the war. Even today, anyone who differs with the CPC government is called a "traitor". How many people called for Colvin to be brought up on treason charges?
some people would consider that abusive.
Did you have to stand in line behind Tiger Woods to get that lawyered up statement?
So bocanut, do you consider the ridicule and mockery you receive here to be "abuse"?
And would you consider the daily garbage spewed by the CPC MP's in Parliament and their supporters, such as this comment, which says Liberals prefer to have our troops killed by terrorists than to keep secret documents secret, to be abuse? Or just libel?
Dear bocanut:
I am going to ask you only one more time -- are you publicly and explicitly accusing me of (in your very words) being "an abuser of women"? It's a simple question, and merits a simple yes or no answer.
I want to be very clear that this is the public accusation you're making against me.
Dear CC,
Perhaps calling numerous women cunts and douchebags because you don't happen to agree with their point of view isn't verbal abuse.
Perhaps telling the distraught mother of a slain soldier to go and fuck her grief because of you're interpretation of her statement isn't verbal abuse.
It's obvious that you don't consider such conduct as verbally abusive towards women so I hope you accept my apology for offending your tender sensibilities.
Just to be clear then, bocanut, you're publicly withdrawing that accusation and apologizing for it, is that correct? Good. That was the smart thing to do.
Would I be correct in assuming that Wanda Watkins, Kate McMillan Kathy Shaidle,Connie Fournier, Sandy Crux, Suzanne Fortin and Cheryl Gallant can expect more of the same responses from you in the future?
You can assume whatever gives you a stiffy, boacunt. All that interests me is the fact that you've frantically and desperately backpedaled from your initial libelous accusation, probably on advice of counsel. Now go have fun assuming. The grownups are trying to talk.
Oh, and ladies? Don't forget ... he's single. I thought you needed to know that.
Post a Comment