Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(2487)
-
▼
January
(276)
- So Long Dumbass
- Did you know the word "gullible" isn't in the dict...
- And suddenly, the fetus fetishists go quiet ...
- Just when you think you've reached the bottom of t...
- The real question is ...
- There's nuanced and thoughtful conservative pundit...
- And that's when things turned ugly ...
- Yes, I can haz bluez.
- Pardon my sweeping generalization.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- The lack of self-awareness is amusing.
- Sunday Saturday morning irreverence.
- Mea. Culpa.
- Outrage can be so context dependent, can't it?
- The joys of mindless superstitution.
- Would someone please spit on Hunter?
- How soon the retarded forget.
- Norm Coleman: Douchebag!
- Oh, fuck me, that's brilliant.
- Dear CP24: Burst into flame and die.
- And sometimes snark fails you ...
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
- That was then. This is now. Shut the hell up.
- What LuLu said, and more.
- There’s no whore like a Reformatory whore.
- Disturbing similarities in the animal kingdom.
- The deficit! It just came out of nowhere!
- Ceiling Cat can haz bluez?
- Irony, where is thy boot to the nads?
- No one loves snow as much as I do!
- The Norm Coleman Douchebag Chronicles.
- I can haz deficit?
- The painfully burning stupid.
- I'm dancing as fast as I can.
- Buyer's remorse, wingnut style.
- No reason.
- And that works just fine for me, thanks.
- The only good Democrat ...
- Blogging Tories Short Takes: Jan 28, 2009.
- The Norm Coleman Chronicles: The douchebagitude.
- OK, fine.
- Oh, sweet Jesus ...
- It's budget day, boys and girls!
- Oh, those Republican morals and ethics.
- That's what happens when you don't keep an eye on ...
- I may never stop laughing.
- Someone didn't get the memo.
- Let me explain the word "dissent" to you, Mathew.
- I cream myself over dead people.
- What. The.
- When stupid Blogging Tories blog, well, stupidly.
- When Web 2.0 meets Stupid 0.01...
- Go!
- But, but, but … the bible says I can.
- Yeah, funny story ...
- And that "let justice take its course" thing? Not...
- I don't need any more stupid in my life.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Part deux.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Oh, fuck me.
- I'm just sayin', ya know?
- And we laughed and laughed ...
- I can haz bluez?
- "Ceasefire?" Ehhh ... not so much.
- "A blessing in disguise".
- Pharyngula'ed in Calgary!
- Awwwwwwwwwkward.
- Dear Gordo: Whatever happened to shutting the fuc...
- Because I said so.
- The gorge rising is now complete.
- Sunday Funnies.
- I'm sorry ... is this a joke?
- Oh, the depressingly burning stupid.
- Yes, Doc, that'll solve the problem.
- Dear Catholic Church: Fuck off.
- The party of the troops?
- Well, OK, except for that.
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- James speak. You listen.
- Irony, where is thy towel snap to the nads?
- Pastor Ted Rides Again!
- Sometimes, people have the right idea.
- 'Cuz that's different. No, really.
- Bow. James Bow. Be there.
- It helps to have a long memory.
- Oh for fuck’s sake ...
- The Angry, Angry Left.
- Cocksucking separatist support for me, but not for...
- Self-absorption deja vu.
- This could get delicious.
- Good Will Twatsy.
- Sure, what the hell, let's talk about accountability.
- The grownups are back! The grownups are back!
- And there's that germ theory of disease, too.
- Um ... ewwwwwwwwwwwww?
- A little unclear on the concept.
- Therefore, black people should never be President.
- I don't think this one's going to get old.
- When a wanker's snark would exceed her grasp.
- LuLu is very, very, VERY tired.
- Constitutional kerners are go!
-
▼
January
(276)
18 comments:
One of the commenters over there:
"The whole Obama becoming President, Democrats picking up seats and Bush leaving office, it's all the liberal media spinning the election."
Hey, at least he/she decided against wearing the black cocktail dress he/she is so fond of in that interview about Canada/Vietnam...
Speaking of which, the High Priest of the Church of Agitprop, Neal Boortz, had a poll about Coultergeist on his web site today. The options were "I'd hit it" and "Would someone PLEASE give Skelator [sic] a sammich?" Guess which option won...
""The whole Obama becoming President, Democrats picking up seats and Bush leaving office, it's all the liberal media spinning the election."
dovetails nicely with john stewart's observation that facts seem to have a liberal bias....
KEvron
At least eight years too late, as far as I'm concerned.
Does this mean we don't have to put up with progressives making "tranny" jokes any more? Because I'd be cool with that.
as david alan grier says, kelseigh, "it's only racist if you are."
between her profound distaste for the gay community and her neurotic obsession with appearance, coulter simply begs for that particular brand of insinuation.
KEvron
The mystery is how a commentator so profoundly and obviously ignorant, a shallow, risible pundit whose entire shtick is based on inflaming the most vulgar rage among the stupidest of audiences, has EVER been taken seriously by anyone. Coulter has NEVER been insightful. She has NEVER had a single original thought that I've seen or piece of analysis that rose above the thuggish glee of bully with a stick.
The world is moving on, and she's caught in her act. Her time really has passed. As the sales slump and the personal appearance invites decline, I expect even more exquisitly humiliating public embarassments as she scramble to regain her shock value, like a small child urinating for attention on the family carpet in front of guests.
One "No, and I don't understand the question" vote noted and recorded. Thank you for your participation.
"I'll get back to you" - and here I thought our Sarah had actually come up with an original response.
Kelseigh, I agree with you. I understand the frustration with Coulter breezily name calling anyone she disagrees with, along with the smirking innuendos that everyone not thinking like her is stupid and has sexual problems, but that doesn't excuse doing the same back.
I expect you would comment on Coulter's endless ad hominems with equal vigor.
Truth be told, the first time I saw a picture of Coulter I thought she looked attractive. Not my type but an attractive woman. Same with Sarah Palin.
But both are extreme and highly offensive people. Both try in their own way to use their attractiveness to mask the ugliness of their messages.
"One 'No, and I don't understand the question' vote noted and recorded."
lol! sorry, i mistakenly believed there might be some level of genuine inquiry to your question. musta been that devious question mark what threw me.
shall i mark you down as "i didn't understand the response" or "i didn't want to understand the response"?
don't let my question mark throw you.
"Thank you for your participation."
as if you'd actually tolerate any....
KEvron
I see I am playing good cop bad cop with KEvron again!
Hahahahahaha!
it's called "irony", ls. the stick up the ass prevents kelseigh from appreciaitng it.
KEvron
"I see I am playing good cop bad cop with KEvron again!"
as pointless an exercise as puntuating with question marks, i'm afraid.
KEvron
dovetails nicely with john stewart's observation that facts seem to have a liberal bias
Actually, KEvron, that was Stephen Colbert at the White House Correspondents' Dinner in 2006.
ah. ballpark.
KEvron
*gratuitous word verification post*
"brain".
uh-thank yew.
KEvron
Two things.
First, I think this woman needs more then one sammich... Maybe two or three at a time for a couple of months, just to get to a healthy weight.
Next, holy Jeebus H Christophor on an over powered pogo stick. I knew she was dumb, but how the fuck can anyone be this dumb and remember to breathe?!
Frankly, yes, America is bigger then us population wise, and has a bigger better equipped military... They most certainly are not better trained now. MOre importantly though, America needs us, more then we need them in my opinion... One switch thrown in Quebec forinstance, and the entire American Eastern Seaboard goes dark... Fresh water... Oil... The list is longer, but I am calling it quits there.
Oddly enough, she's not quite as wrong on Canada's involvement in Vietnam as she is on every other thing.
Canada sent at least a platoon of military engineers to Vietnam in the earlier days of the war. They were "advisers".
@Balbulican: Your last couple of sentences made me really, truly, lol.
Post a Comment