Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Sure, let's talk about civility, shall we?
Why, yes, I'd love to talk about civility. By all means, let's get comfortable and you can lecture me all about it. Oh, wait ... what's this?
Sorry, where were we? Oh, right, something about civility. Go right ahead. I'm all ears.
P.S. Would you like to know where vicious misogynists and NAMBLA devotees like Richard Evans come from? Typically, they start out as loud-mouthed bullies with anger management problems who spam other bloggers' comment sections.
I just thought you needed to know that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
36 comments:
"they start out as loud-mouthed bullies with anger management problems who spam other bloggers' comment sections."
you couldn't have just pulled me aside?! oh, you mean....
KEvron
Did you guys know that MC Hammer is on Twitter?
wv = impshin
The BTs always tip their hand based on what trolls they send out.
Looks like they are worried. Nothing new for them though.
"Hammer Time"...
I did not know that, Sheena. Does he still wear poo-catchers? Shaq is on Twitter, too.
wv = "bardnet". Hmmmmm... a 100,000 monkeys on 100,000 laptops will eventually write Hamlet?
Good grief, this man is incalcitrant.
Bad enough he trolls, but does he have to include every previous post he's made?!
Look at it this way, Anarchore.
If you acted this way in a restaurant, you'd be thrown out.
If you acted this way at work, you'd be reprimanded if not outright fired.
If you acted this way in public, you'd probably get insulted, possibly punched, and maybe even arrested.
The blogosphere is no different. Step on people's toes, and you WILL be removed from the premises.
To paraphrase CC, these people are not to be engaged, let alone debated. They are to be laughed at.
wv: yedise
speaking of "loud-mouthed bullies with anger management problems who spam other bloggers' comment sections," who lets that lunatic out? Would someone please tell him about that vile Zionist Richard Evans? I bet Anarchore could sort him out. Talk about a match made in heaven.
What people need to understand is that DICK! is a psychic vampire. He feeds off the negative emotions of the people whom he harasses. The less reactions he gets the more enraged he becomes at being so incredibly irrelevant. Just ignore him and he'll eventually wander off to stalking his next victims. It is amazing that the little woman in that marriage apparently has no problem with DICK!'s NAMBLA obsession.
My advice to the woman in question was to contact the police. I hope she does. I've seldom seen a more obvious breach of Section 264 of the Criminal Code.
Dawg is right. Call the cops and let them handle it.
Polly is mishandling this though, if she still hasn't registered a complaint with the police. She's been well within her rights to this for a long time now...NAMBLA-Richard started this crap long ago. And now she's left a voice recording for the little psychopath to continue his fucking pointless attack and ritual humiliation.
That psychotic needs to have his internet cut off once and for all.
Sounds like these two were made for each other.
What a dismal show.
Ti-Guy; Are you still diddling little boys?
I'm going to agree with Ti-Guy and RT here -- Polly/Joanne definitely handled this badly. It doesn't exucse Dick's behaviour as, well, a total dick, but that's one feces-slinging contest I'd rather not get in the middle of at this point.
If I were Polly, I'd just lay low and wait for Dick to do something clearly criminal. You know it's inevitable.
Dick expectorates:
"Ti-Guy; Are you still diddling little boys?"
Asks the man whose name will forevermore be linked with, well, diddling little boys.
Some delightful irony there, wouldn't you say, Dick?
I don't care what the fucker says anymore. But his criminal behaviour should have been stopped long ago.
I don't have a blog, and I don't use my real name, so I have no personal stake in any of this. But every single blogger who's been harrassed by NAMBLA Richard Evans should be bombarding his ISP with complaints (and CC'ing them to the RCMP's cybercrimes unit), at the very least.
Why can't all the progressive blogs just block anything that comes from his ISP? All he's looking for is attention. ...and he's a Dick...
Now you guys are learning about Zionism, and what personalities this twisted atrocity celebrating cult produces!
You are only on the starting slope of the learning curve however, investigate further the role of Zionists in the Liberal and Conservative Parties and the media.
And by Zionists I include Harper and MacKay, Dion and Ignatiev, it is not just Jews.
The Zionists pretty much have Canada's politics locked up tight.
I mean, what is political power, it is the power of the media, and the power to marginalize and exclude those who don't agree with terrorist Israel having such a say in Canada.
The Liberals kicked out a candidate who told some of the truth about Israel's involvement in 9/11, Lesley Hughes.
So NAMBLA-Dick is a Zionist? Who knew?
Just a couple of things...
I have repeatedly blocked his ISP.
I agree - I did not handle this well...In the past, I have ignored him and hoped he went away...I'm finishing up the semester (and have been ill for six weeks) and really don't have the energy to contact the police. I've also had much worse cases of stalking (e.g.) ex-boyfriends so my position is to save the police for when you need them most...
I am not that active in the blog world these days...Is there truth to claims that he supports NAMBLA?!
If anyone does feel they need to pursue a court case, I am willing to submit any evidence that I have in support.
"Is there truth to claims that he supports NAMBLA?!"
i believe folks here are operting by the maxim that it would be irresponsible not to speculate.
dick does have a history of creating bogus links that re-direct the unsuspecting blogger to the nambla site. clever, isn't he?
KEvron
I agree - I did not handle this well.
Don't be too hard on yourself. It's always been well within NAMBLA Dick's ability to stop bothering people, especially after harassment he initiates.
*shudder* I can't understand why his wife puts up with this.
The thing I don't understand is this:
Does he genuinely think he's involved in some kind of legitimate discourse or is he aware that he's a troll?
Because he behaves (and some of his commentators do as well) as if it's just amazing that people seem to dislike him.
Which is odd, because the only constant in any of these equations is him.
I am not that active in the blog world these days...Is there truth to claims that he supports NAMBLA?!
Richard has purchased domains that he redirected to NAMBLA, in order, it seems, to increase their traffic. This is not a matter of speculation; the public record is clear, and he admitted as such himself in multiple places. He's done the same with Stormfront, too (a Neo-Nazi site in case you're not familiar).
I have asked him numerous times about what compensation he has received from those sites, including any donations to his recent political campaign. He has not yet answered me.
The NAMBLA redirects were put in place to tie pedophiles and their enablers (CC and thai-guy) to their support system. If CC and thai-guy have a problem with being associated with such an organisation, they're more than welcome to file a complaint with the proper authorities.
Richard, you put those redirects in place, without any involvement from CC, Ti-Guy, or anyone else to my knowledge.
So I'll ask again. What compensation did you receive from those organizations in return for directing traffic to their sites? Was any of that compensation in the form of donations to your recent political campaign?
m@;
There was no compensation. I don't feel the need to get paid to expose pedophiles and their enablers (CC and thai-guy) as being the lowlifes that they are.
Oh, yeah, of course CC and thai-guy weren't involved with setting up of the domains. Do you really think those two kiddie diddlers would out themselves?
So you're saying that, at your own personal expense, you set up redirects to NAMBLA and Stormfront?
How refreshing to hear some truth from you at last, Richard. And it paints quite the picture, let me tell you.
Are you planning to run for your local government again in the next election, by any chance?
I've said it before m@. I've nothing to hide and I feel no shame in it. www.canadiancynic.com was redirected, by me, to the NAMBLA home page. If tying CC to NAMBLA was somehow slanderous or in any way a false, CC himself would have filed a lawsuit. In the 2 and 1/2 years since that redirect was implimented, CC has been silent. Now, you've really got to ask yourself, what's CC not telling you?
Richard, of course it's not slanderous or false. It's your URL, and whether you use it to improve NAMBLA's traffic is up to you. I can't really see how it would be the basis of a lawsuit.
Then again, maybe it's a joke and I'm just not getting it. After all, I don't find the Holocaust to be a joking matter, but you certainly do, don't you?
Imagine having a father who calls perfect strangers pedophiles?
Richard kids are going to be soaking in shame when they're old enough to understand what their fuckwitted father has been up to all of these years.
Now, you've really got to ask yourself, what's CC not telling you?
What CC is not telling YOU is who he is and how to find him.
Because that is what you are trying to do. You are trying to locate him in the real world so you can attempt to intimidate him.
You have discovered that your attempts to browbeat everyone into accepting your extremist views is hampered by people calling you out on your lies. Your solution is to eliminate such people, either through intimidation or actual violence. We don't really know how far you might go, do we? But there is no question there is a very sinister side to your incessant attempts at tracking people.
You know that is your plan. Is your hit man still on retainer?
hmmmmm,
He's been commenting on my blog recently.
Why me, though? I'm an American... not like my opinions matter to people in Canada.
Post a Comment