Thursday, January 31, 2008

Uh oh ...


... this definitely doesn't look good.

Of course, if history is any judge, Raphael Alexander should be along shortly to explain how this concerns him but he's not going to jump to any conclusions until all the facts are in.

3 comments:

JimBobby said...

Whooee! Thankee fer the linkup, CC.

There were a few occasions last fall when MacKay and Harper, as well, were questioned on detainees and they said we have a good agreement with the Afghans and it's working fine. It was, in fact, not working fine. It wasn't working, at all. The agreement had been suspended on Nov 6 and MacKay and Harper both knew that. Even so, they replied with snarky "support the troops, you Taliban-lover" type quips.

JB

Raphael Alexander said...

I'm not going to defend Peter MacKay over anything. I'll only say that if he was sworn to secrecy over the matter, he certainly didn't have to make political fodder of it in the House by impugning the motives of the opposition. A simple "no comment" would do.

Cherniak_WTF said...

RA, you just did defend MacKay.....