Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(2150)
-
▼
January
(201)
- Apparently, it runs in the family.
- Fun with domain names.
- "Going postal": Sometimes, it's not just a stupid...
- Oh, look. More wankery, neo-con lying.
- Richard Dawkins on Intelligent Design.
- This whole "patent" thing has gotten seriously out...
- American progressives still not getting the point.
- Apparently, miracles are in the eye of the beholder.
- Well, you didn't see THAT coming, did you?
- It all depends on whose version of the news you read.
- Intelligent Design: God is a weenie.
- Playtime at Open Bathrobe Media.
- Ho hum ... just another war crime.
- Putting the wankersphere under a microscope.
- The "crazy uncle in the basement" syndrome.
- Cute overload.
- The "welfare state," Palestinian style.
- Jason Kenney -- in his own hermetically-sealed uni...
- Oh, those fighting young College Republicans.
- Oh, this is going to be fun.
- Dear neo-cons: Still supporting those troops, I see.
- Project management for complete idiots.
- Tolerance, intolerance, SSM, reproductive rights a...
- A celibate homosexual and a transgender cross-dres...
- Open thread.
- Oprah and principles: still not comfortable with ...
- Congratulations, Kitchener-Conestoga. You've pick...
- Well, THAT was a short honeymoon.
- God, and the "perfect" example of an idiotic argum...
- "But ... but ... but ... Bill Clinton ..."
- "Intelligent Design" and kid gloves: I don't thin...
- Dave takes on the kids over at PowerTools and live...
- Death by poverty -- it's not just for third-world ...
- Dear Stephen: You want troops? Get them from Que...
- George Bush. Osama bin Laden. Flip. Flop.
- Progressives to Dems: Go fuck yourselves.
- Mine safety official to Senate subcommittee: Bite...
- The night of the long knives.
- The annoying hypocrisy of "progressive" American D...
- Line of the day.
- Irony as a blunt instrument.
- Oh, those onerous workplace decisions.
- The Juno excitement is just palpable.
- "I've got mine," Canadian style.
- "Oh ... THAT detailed early warning."
- The U.S. Supreme Court, Samuel Alito and Intellige...
- The stultifying hypocrisy of blissful ignorance.
- The Chronicles of Ralphia: New minority conservat...
- Dear Americans:
- Go, Dook!
- Dear progressives: What will you do if the Libera...
- Well, I'd say that worked out rather well.
- Physical beatings: It's all a matter of context.
- A multi-talented young man, that Mike.
- "Moral absolutes?" I don't think so.
- WaPo ombudsman Deborah Howell: Redefining "dense."
- Making fun of Wal-Mart.
- If you don't vote, bad things will happen.
- Then there are the counter-examples ...
- Intelligent Design and its groupies.
- Halliburton to troops: Eat shit.
- Dear Paul:
- Deborah Howell, journalistic whore: Document the ...
- "My doctor said Panexa."
- CNN's Lou Dobbs involved in racially-motivated gan...
- Dear Canadian wankers: How will we know if Stephe...
- Some people take themselves WAY too seriously.
- Harper's obsession with missile defense is getting...
- Little Stevie wanders off the reservation. Bad th...
- Can we just throw these CPC candidates in jail and...
- Democracy on the march in the Middle East?
- WaPo to readers: Fuck off, you big meanies.
- And an extra $50 if you bring back the ears and th...
- The joy of slapping around anonymous commenters.
- The schizophrenia of Stephen Harper.
- Dumbfuckitude, Canadian style.
- Yes, you're an atheist. (Part 2)
- That's the way things work here in Bizarro World.
- "Maher Arar? Never heard of him."
- "Look! Another Terri!"
- Oh, yes, that American medical system is a real ro...
- An open letter to PZ Myers.
- "Daddy, what did you do during the war?"
- What the hell?
- And she seemed like such a nice girl ...
- Yes, you're an atheist. (Part 1)
- Why are letters editors such assholes?
- "Pentagon forbids troops to buy better body armor."
- Dear Iraqis: Welcome to "democracy."
- Dear religious person: No, I DON'T respect your r...
- A good Canadian read.
- The recent "no-fly" list incident takes a weird turn.
- Ralph Reed: "Putting money before God."
- Dear Manitoban: Why do you soil your pages with t...
- Apparently, a slow news day at the CBC.
- There's "accurate." There's "precise." Then ther...
- With "allies" like this, who needs terrorists?
- Being a tramp for God.
- And after a long hiatus, a math puzzle.
- "Some women are misogynists, too."
-
▼
January
(201)
10 comments:
Ha ha! Paper ballots! How quaint!
And accurate!
Our elections run fine when Democrats don't try to screw them up.
Our elections run fine when Democrats don't try to screw them up.
I assume you mean by Democrats suggesting that they actually want their votes counted? Yeah, they really can be a pain in the ass that way, can't they?
Good call CC! I agree. Those retarded machines in the US are terrible. It is no wonder Kerry lost LOL!
And how long did it take to actually get the results in? 2, 3 4 hours only?
Yes, Democrats want their votes counted - including the ones dead people cast. They also want spoiled (and thus illegitimate) punchcard ballots counted, even if people have to sit in a hot, cramped room for hours on end trying to figure out who this moron voted for and that moron voted for.
However, they will fight tooth and nail to throw out every absentee ballot from military personnel that they can based on the slightest of problems.
Go figure.
Ah, this would be the "But ... but ... the Deomcrats did it too!" defense. Can blaming Bill Clinton be far behind?
as a card carrying democrat i resent the judgemental and utterly stupid comments made by "anonymous" in this post. and i further resent having to waste my valuable time reading them. cc please consider censorship with some of these dim bulbs.
You see, much of the modern Republican party consists of people who switched from being Democrats because of the passage of the Voting Rights Act.
They simply think that black people have no business voting.
"Ah, this would be the "But ... but ... the Deomcrats did it too!" defense. Can blaming Bill Clinton be far behind?"
You're kind of stuck on that lame retort, aren't you?
In any case, no, it's not anything like that (and Bill Clinton wouldn't know how to cheat an election if he had "Cheating at an Election for Dummies"). This is the "Democrats were, are, and always will be hypocrites" defense. They want votes that they know will favor them counted no matter how illegitimate (or illegal) they are while at the same time throwing out votes they know will favor the Republicans.
If you're going to count illegitimate ballots (e.g. spoiled ones), then count absentee ballots even if they have some minor problem with them. If you're going to throw out absentee ballots because they have some minor problem with them, then throw out illegitimate ballots, too.
Do I have to spell it out further for you, or is it still too complex for your childish brain?
BTW, blame the Democrats for the increased demand for electronic voting machines. If they had been smart enough to use paper ballots in the 2000 Florida election, the issue never would've come up.
Yeah, that Democratic elections officer in Florida sure screwed up, big time.
So you account for the massive irregularities in Ohio how? Democratic meddling? And the lack of Republican support for auditable electronic voting machines is, what, proof positive of their superior intellect?
Just because you call other people hypocrites doesn't make it so.
Post a Comment