Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Heh. Indeed.

Mark has a point:

If Kate has an objection to Dawg's interpretation, then why has she tolerated without clear comment on her blog otherwise all the bloody comments celebrating the murders of journalists? Here's a tip, Kate: If your readers think you are saying it, then a judge is going to agree with Dawg too.

Quite so. Put slightly differently, if the vast majority of your commenters are howling, "Damn right, Kate, I too enjoy the violent deaths of journalists!" and you refuse to correct them, it's going to be tough to argue that that's not what you were getting at.

More on this later.

No comments: