Mark has a point:
If Kate has an objection to Dawg's interpretation, then why has she tolerated without clear comment on her blog otherwise all the bloody comments celebrating the murders of journalists? Here's a tip, Kate: If your readers think you are saying it, then a judge is going to agree with Dawg too.
Quite so. Put slightly differently, if the vast majority of your commenters are howling, "Damn right, Kate, I too enjoy the violent deaths of journalists!" and you refuse to correct them, it's going to be tough to argue that that's not what you were getting at.