Sunday, November 22, 2009

Dear Iceman: Any chance of an apology sometime soon?

Here's Blogging Tory "Iceman," making an ass of himself in public:

Did Richard Colvin commit a war crime?

... Therefore my question is, if this guy knew that innocent people were being tortured and he did not tell a single superior visiting the theatre of war, is Richard Colvin personally liable for the alleged violation of the Geneva Conventions?

And then there's reality:

Many NATO officials in Kabul were also aware how seriously Canadian diplomat Richard Colvin was following the issue, he said.

"Richard Colvin behaved as a straight-up-and-down person, completely honest and doing his job to the best of his abilities," the former official said.

"He had to be terribly careful. He couldn't speak to us about this. But it was clear that the tone at the Canadian Embassy had changed. It became far more politicized – and it was clear that Richard Colvin was struggling enormously to do his work on the question of detainees."

There's a reason I refer collectively to Canada's Blogging Tories as horrifically stupid buttfuck retards. I'm sure you can tease out why.

1 comment:

burpster said...

British ambassador.

Read this for a sense of the depravity the US will stoop to in their terror war.